Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

spring6 v egg


spring6
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, have now turned my attention to egg...have downloaded statements on-line and sent the first letter claiming charges back for the last year - I have also sent SAR request for last 6 years in total...the wait begins...but at least it's underway - following other threads with interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now received letter advising me my complaint may take 8 weeks to investigate... will stick to my TT though. Also received their form with the 3 options for charges summary. Have started claim with the 12 months I got on-line and will add rest when I receive it. Does egg send information within the timescales they set out in the letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spring6.

 

Egg gave me an initial date which was 2 weeks later than what it should have been. However, they suddenly kicked into action and responded not long after 40 day expiry. Possibly because i keep refusing to deal with the DCA telling them the account is in dispute until i've clarified the balance!!!

 

i didn't mind how long it took because i'm not making payments while it's being disputed. See how it goes, let us know when they get in touch :)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, I've now received the rest of my statements from egg. I've had no further response from them about the claim I started for the years worth of statements I was able to get on-line so I'm going to add the two together and file with MCOL.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

A straightforward letter to Egg in plain English, accompanied by a spreadsheet itemising the charges and interest reclaimed, was sufficient for all other claimants over the past 6 months, usually getting paid within a week.

 

By all means use MCOL, but it will cost extra, and will take longer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To whom did you address your letter? Try Emma wotshername the manager. Not only has she been efficient, the letter I got from her was even courteous. Have to bear in mind the peak holiday season of August is upon us.

 

A few claimants were paid within a day or two, at least the notification of forthcoming Egg payment, which was as good as gold.

 

GL.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have addressed it to a Jeanette Hadfield in the Customer Relations Office because she wrote to me. I can change it though - do you have a full name and address? Thanks for your help Mistermind it's v much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this peak holiday season try address it to

 

Emma Clayton OR Guy Harrison.

 

Both have been known for prompt efficient action. Guy refunded Irishrose in one day, and Emma is known for her courteous intelligent letters. It has become quite civilized, civil, even pleasant with Egg now, but it seems you could get varying responses depending on who handles the case.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have sent it off - amazingly got offer to settle today for first half of my claim which is just over £100. Egg has offered me £4. Do you think it's an error is egg serious?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the standard Egg template letter saying they have already done their duty reducing £20 charge to the OFT-specified threshold figure of £16 (special dispensation for Egg, £12 for others).

 

If you send back the equally standard CAG template letter in moc1982's winning thread, you should get an offer to repay in full by return of post.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Egg reduced their £20 charge to £16 round about July 2006. I would deduce from your £4 offer from Egg, that you incurred just one £20 charge before August 2006, plus 5 or 6 £16 charges after that time. Egg is not taking the mickey, this is a ritual dance with fixed steps, like the cha cha cha.

 

Your move next -- the moc1982 template letter step from you, to be followed by Egg's template repayment of all charges, by return of post probably.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well done spring6, trust you will have a pleasing fizzy drink? ;)

 

Once again a claimant has happily pocketed the return of his money. Once again the word easy has been used.

 

All who have not done so, roll up, roll up. It's easy now, but it won't stay easy much longer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Well done Spring6. I'm glad that was a pain free event!! Enjoy the refreshing beverages! :p

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...