Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

fincal v Lloyds TSB


fincal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't worry, its highly unlikely that you'll need them. There is in fact a link from post #1 of this thread to a new T&C library, although it's still a bit sparse at the monent.

 

Out of interest, what do you mean they refused? How did you ask, by going in the branch? What exactly did they say?

 

Also, what stage of the claim are you at, and do you have a thread?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i havent a thread im so rubbish at this im trying to work out how to do it sorry. I rang the bank for the T&C and they said i can have them only if i put in a complaint.(well they said they would try). Im preparing my bundle at the moment. Court date for allocation is 9th August and im dreading it. Thanks for the link, i have the T&C now for '98 i need them for 2003 now for my other account. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go, your very own thread!:D Use this one from now on to ask any questions and post updates on your progress. If you want the title to be different just let me know and I'll change it for you.

 

Is it an allocation hearing? If so then you don't need T&C's and its nothing to worry about at all.

 

Can you post up the full wording of the order please?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks so much for that. Well ive got a notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing) so dont know what that means... is that an allocation hearing? ive also prepared my bundle please can you let me know if ive done it right:

- statment of OFT

-Analysis of unfair terms

- scottish law commission report

-Peter mcnamara transcript

- various letter from lloyds about why they charge

-case law - dgft v national bank,bridge v campbell,dunlop v new garage

- witness statement

- terms and conditions for just one of my accounts at the moment

im a bit concerend that i havent personalised my bundle very much (well hardly to be honest), as i couldnt find much evidence. I have the standard charges letter that we all receive. Do i need to add anything else. I am so dreading this, i just want to get the bundle off and pray for a settelmrnt letter. Im eagerly awaiting any help. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the answer unfortunately but just wanted to say good luck.

The wise ones will reply to you soon I'm sure.

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

The schedule of charges is the spreadsheet you shoud have sent off with your prelim and LBA, listing the charges and when they were levied.

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, can any one please help me, i have to submit my bundle within 7 days and im frantic with worry. I have an allocation hearing. I have used a previous thread from the wise ones on how to prepare your bundle. So far i have, witness statement, T&C (for one of my accounts), transcript from peter mcnamara, statement of the OFT's position, analysis of unfair terms, scottish law report, some old letters from other users indicating the charges are to cover lloyds costs, ,director general of fair trading V first national bank, bridge V cambell, Dunlop V New Garage, do i need anything else, what else have people used. I cant seem to find anything that is personal to me! please i need help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow broke daves advice.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the court directions on here please so that we can offer proper advice.

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, I'M TRYING TO LOCATE TWO PIECES I NEED TO COMPLETE MY BUNDLE BUT I CANT FIND THEM ANYWHERE: robinson v harman and the australian report from nicole rich, please can any one help one very stressed person!!:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi can any one plaese help, im looking for two pieces of info i need to complete my bundle

- robinson v harman

- the australian report from nicole rich

 

i would soooo appreciate it thanks loads:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi micheal, i cant thankyou enough what help! the link for the robinson case law, was that all i need do you know as i thought i need to have the whole case transcript? thanks again:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, not sure if im doing this all right but hey! sorry to be a pain, but the paragraph ive received for this case is that all i need to put in the bundle? as i thought i needed the whole transcript of the case? thnaks for the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Four threads merged to help track your progress.:)

 

If you need to find your thread in the future click on your user name and then click 'find all threads strarted by' and it will come up.

 

Best of luck with your claim :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...