Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hootie19 -v- Barclaycard


Hootie19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6072 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is me taking on the might of Barclaycard on behalf of my husband.

 

We've got all the statements from June 2001 to date.

 

We've drawn up a list of the charges (£531.00)

 

And I know that the next step is to do the letter asking them to refund the charges, but I also have a feeling that there is a specific template letter for credit card companies as opposed to bank accounts.

 

I am, I'm afraid to admit, hopeless at finding stuff anywhere - in the house, in the car, online, in forums etc - and so I was wondering if someone could be kind enough to point me in the right direction, and if possible, mention the right address to write to. I've had a look at the addresses thread and my eyes glazed!

 

Many thanks (hoping this fight will be much easier than my own against Capital One - my god I've made that one hard for myself lol)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much rae may. It's amazing to me just how helpful people will be on this forum - even to a klutz like me!

 

Letter done. I've just addressed it to the place I sent off for the statements. Does that sound right, or should I be using the Barclays Bank address in London that I saw mentioned in the addresses thread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, things are trotting along.

 

Prelim letter sent 6th July

 

Reply (dated 13th July) received 23rd July, offering the difference between what we claimed and the current £12 fee (183.00). (Due to no ink for the printer, we haven't written back yet).

 

Barclaycard statement received today with a credit of £183 on it.

 

Now, we haven't accepted this as a conclusion to the claim, so I suppose we now just write (having got ink cartridges today - yay!) and say thank you, we accept the £183 in part payment, but we still quite like the idea of claiming the remaining £384, thank you very much.

 

Cheeky beggars - suppose they thought we'd be grateful for any little thing.

 

(It was nice to see the Barclaycard balance below £1,000 though :) )

 

Watch this space :lol:

 

 

 

 

ETA: This is the letter we received

 

thank you for your recent letter, your details have been passed to me in order that I may respond in my capacity as Customer Relations Manager.

 

I am sorry you feel that charges you have incurred are unfair. We believe that our charges are both fair and transparent, and we make them clear in our Terms and Conditions, and on the reverse of every monthly statement.

 

In your correspondence you have outlined a legal argument which you say supports your view. As I am sure you will appreciate Barclaycard is aware of all the information you have drawn to our attention. I must inform you, however, that we disagree with your legal analysis.

 

Putting the above to one side, as a good will gesture, and without any admission of liability, I am prepared to credit your account with the difference between the charges that you have incurred and the current £12 fee. This would amount to £183.00.

 

The adjustment will be confirmed on your next statement.

 

May I take this opportunity to remind you that the best way to avoid similar charges in the future is to remain within you credit limit and ensure that your monthly payment reaches us with the required timeframe.

 

Should you have any further questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me. If my reply does not meet with your expectations you may ultimately be eligible to refer to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Further details of this service are available on request. If I have not heard from you within 8 weeks from the date of this letter, I will close my complaint file in accordance with our usual practice.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Leigh Hollas

Barclaycard Customer Services

 

 

 

Now - the offer isn't made in FULL AND FINAL settlement, nor are there conditions attached. So which of the rejection letters templated here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

should I used to write back.

 

I thought Letter 4, but will wait and hope to hear for sure, before sending it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I would got for #4 as you want the whole lot, plus you give them permission to take it back and replace with a FULL settlement.

 

Don't be grateful for a 'little thing' go get it ALL back ;)

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I would got for #4 as you want the whole lot, plus you give them permission to take it back and replace with a FULL settlement.

 

Don't be grateful for a 'little thing' go get it ALL back ;)

 

Good luck!

 

Thanks moneyhelp. I sent the letter off recorded delivery this morning, but having now read the news about all current claims being put on hold, my heart's in my boots :(

 

Guess we can only keep our fingers crossed and wait until we hear the outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Right, having accepted that all these claims were on hold until after the test case, I have now been told that it doesn't apply to credit cards.

 

In that case, we are in a position to be able to file the court stuff against Barclaycard.

 

Further to my last post, we got a letter back basically saying that the £183 is all you're getting, like it or lump it.

 

We've decided to lump it!!

 

However, I read on here somewhere that *some* institutions were having success in challenging the claims as there isn't enough information given on the printed out version of the court papers on MCOL, and that the papers now ought to be delivered to the court in person, as more information can be put on the printed out form.

 

Is this right, or am I misremembering stuff.

 

I really want to try and get this done today - too much procrastination already.

 

We are both off work this week, so can get to the nearest court (next town along) have just been paid (so can afford the £80 fee) and don't want to lose momentum.

 

Can anyone offer any advice please?

 

 

Edited to add: - what do I do on the court form about the £183 they've credited back to the account already?

 

Plus - in the help to fill out forms post

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

I'm a bit confused about the "value" section. I have so far put:

 

Charges - £531.00

Interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 - £135.99 (this is what is shown on the spreadsheet I downloaded from here and entered all the charges onto)

Court Fee - £80

 

so that's ok, I think. But it's the next bit I can't "get". Plus interest etc.

 

But interest is already added above! So is this to continue charging interest until the claim is settled? If so, can someone please spell out in really really little words how to work it out, as that post says something about overdraft interest, which obviously you don't have on a credit card.

 

Sorry to

(a) be so dim

and

(b) ramble on so much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...