Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cahoot unfair charges - just started


Leonie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This week I received £100 in charges for two returned direct debits worth £55!

 

I also had a returned cheque fee earlier in the month for £25 becasue they delayed paying in a cheque for me.

 

Attached below is the email I sent to Cahoot customer services:

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Account number: XXXXXXXX

 

My request

 

I am writing to you to ask you to refund me the charges you have taken from my account.

 

I have had two returned DD items of around £55 for which you've placed £100 in fees onto my account this week. In addition, there is an earlier fee of £25 for a returned cheque on 11/06.

 

I now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law and contrary to consumer regulations. If you say that they are not, then will you please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put by as a result of my breaches, in order to reassure me that your charges really do reflect your costs.

 

In addition, £100 for 2 small returned direct debits and the impact on my overdraft is well out of proportion. It has now been confirmed that your particularly high level of penalties are considered to be unfair per se by the OFT who reported on the 5th April 2006 and are therefore presumed to be unlawful in the absence of specific proof to the contrary, considered to be unfair per se by the OFT who reported on the 5th April 2006 and are therefore presumed to be unlawful.

 

Your responsibilities

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

What I require

Please remove all of the fees mentioned above. I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment. If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.

 

Regards,

 

I received the following:

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear XXX

 

I refer to your email dated 3rd July 2007 regarding your cahoot Current account. I have taken ownership of your particular case in order to provide a response to the issues you have raised. We do not accept that cahoot charges are unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. The object of these Regulations was not price control nor were they intended to interfere with people's freedom to agree the terms of their contracts. It is well known that banks make charges and cahoot charges are in line with those of other banks. The terms and conditions of the account and the charges that apply are clear and fair and were provided to you at the time you opened it. You freely agreed to the terms and conditions and the charges when you opened the account. You were not under any obligation to do so and could have gone to another bank if you did not agree to the charges. Equally, you are free to move your account to another bank at any time if you do not agree with the charges. In any event, we do not agree that the charges are disproportionate. The charges are reasonable and proportionate to the administrative costs incurred by cahoot. I am therefore unable to refund the charges you've incurred fully appreciating the disappointment this may cause. If you need anything further please do not hesitate to contact me. Please be assured I have carried out a full investigation for you and I hope you feel I have offered a fair response to all of the issues you've raised. I will keep your file open for the next 8 weeks and if I don't hear from you within that time, I will assume that everything is resolved and will close your file. If you remain dissatisfied though you can find details of how to take your complaint further within Abbey at legal T&Ts under the heading 'Complaints policy'. The complaints policy also explains your ultimate right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours sincerely

Moomie Choudhury

cahoot

 

Which seems pretty standard!

 

So, on to the next contact stage I think - should I continue to email or does this need to be a written letter? Any help appreciated.

 

Thanks

L Smith

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Bexterwho, that's a good idea.

 

Since the original request they've added another £55 in charges, and I can't even work out why - it all seems to be related to the same event.

 

So, just drafted the letter and going to write it up tomorrow with ALL these charges included.

 

I'll let you know what happens...

L Smith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, just about to post the following letter:

 

***********************************************

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXX

 

I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond to my email letter of the 03/07/07 with a full refund of the penalties applied to my account.

 

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law and contrary to consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise.

 

I calculate that you have taken £180 in penalties. I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a breakdown of the charges in my original email of 03/07/07, and since then two additional charges have been applied (£25 + £30), and these are now included in the attached breakdown. All are summarised here:

 

6/6/2007 Returned Item Charge 25.00

2/7/2007 Returned Item Charge 50.00

2/7/2007 Unpaid STO fee 25.00

2/7/2007 Unpaid STO fee 25.00

3/7/2007 Returned Item Charge 25.00

3/8/2007 Unauthorised OD fee 30.00

TOTAL £180

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

You are also requested to forward a copy of the Terms and Conditions that were in force at the time my account was opened, and any subsequent amendments to those Terms and Conditions. These are requested under CPR Pre-Action Protocol 4.6©, and failure to provide them will be brought to the attention of the court, should it be necessary to commence a county court action.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

***********************************************

 

Wish me luck!

L Smith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck!!!

What are the Unpaid STO charges. I was thinking they looked like Standing Orders but surely they shouldn't be charging for those as if the money isn't in your account to pay the standing order, then nothing happens. I could be wrong about that though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...