Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
    • moved to the debt self help forum. plenty of like threads here to read along with the ones you've done so far..good work. last thing you ever want to do is look at any kind of IVO/BK or anything alike concerning consumer debt, never do that, turns unsecured debts into secured ones in many instances. your best bet for now is p'haps looks at  Options for dealing with your debts: Breathing Space (Debt Respite Scheme) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) sadly you have to go thru one of the free debt charities to invoke that but DON'T be tempted to also open up a DMP with them, just get the Breathing Space done. get that in place that gives you at leasy 60 days buffer you've also goto to realise you'll probably get a default once breathing space is in place, bit if not it might pay you to withhold payments even after BS then p'haps re start payments once a DN for each debt is issued and registered. at least that way, whatever happens in 6yrs the debt will drop off dx  
    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Action fraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

General Form of Judgement or Order


akje
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please Help; getting very nervous!!!

 

I have today received a “General Form of Judgement or Order” from Cardiff County Court and have no idea what it means or what I do next.

 

It states:-

 

Before District Judge Hendicott, sitting at Cardiff County Court, Cardiff Justice Centre

 

Upon neither party attending

 

IT IS ORDERED

 

1. Directions will be given in this case by the Designated Civil Judge, His Honour Judge Hickinbottom on the 14th Auguest 2007 at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

 

2. The parties my appear in person or make written representations as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representation is sent to the Court and the other side 7 days prior to hearing.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello akje,

 

Im also at exactly the same stage with exactly the same letter received.

 

Im claiming £1125 against Alliance & Leicester on behalf of my girlfriend, having following the guided steps of MSE up to this point.

 

I would now appreciate some help on court bundles etc. and what the "General Form of Judgement" is about as deltailed in the above thead.

 

I will be ringing the court tomz to make sure no AQ is needed and then writing a nudge letter to Wragge & Co the solicitors.

 

I will keep u posted on my progress but need some reassurance that Im doing things right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response, i am claiming aginst the abbey for circa £3k; I have submitted the following witness statement as a nudge; the court has confirmed its ok to enter as a request for directions.

 

CLAIM NO: XXXXXXX

In the Cardiff County Court

 

AKJE

Claimant

-AND-

Abbey National PLC

Defendant

CASE SUMMARY

________________________________________________________

1. I am the Claimant in this case.

2. On the 24th March 2007 I wrote to the Defendant requesting a refund of charges.

3. On the 12th April 2007 I wrote again to the Defendant requesting a refund of charges and advised I would file a claim should I not receive a satisfactory response.

4. On the 26th April 2007 I wrote again to the Defendant advising I would be filing a claim as I had not received a satisfactory response to my two previous requests.

5. On 1st May 2007 I filed with Northampton County Court a claim against the Defendant for the return of excessive penalty charges as outlined in my Particulars of Claim (attached).

6. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied.

7. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the Contract between itself and the Claimant.

8. A list of charges applied is attached to this Case Summary.

9. The Claimant contends that:-

a. The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

b. The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Paragraph 8, Schedule 2(1)(e); The Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 Section 4; and the Common Law.

10. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

i. The return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £2510.

ii. Court costs (MCOL court fee of £120.00).

iii. Interest of £444.62 (as calculated at 24.03.07) under Section 69 of the County Courts Act as set out on the attached list of charges.

11. The Claimant respectfully requests that the Court, in this case, notwithstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure.

a. The Defendant to file at the Court office and serve me with a list setting out how charges have been calculated.

b. The Defendant to file at the Court office and serve me details of their internal charging system and associated internal costing structure

c. I understand that it is in the Courts discretion to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its seems you're on top of everything then, you're the 4th person Ive found with that letter from Cardiff CC with the same time and date. Must be some kind of mass meeting of people vs banks.

 

Are you going to turn up or just post your nudge letter and wait for directions?

 

Are you claiming bank charges or mortgage payment as the thread suggests?

 

Anyway see my response I recently posted on the MSE website.

 

I have 2 friends in the legal business and have explained what the letter entails. Ive quoted the response.

 

Don't worry its not a trial, it is just a short hearing where the parties (ie Kath and the bank) get a chance to say how they want the case to proceed. The judge will just give you instructions of what to do and by when - such as what evidence he wants from both parties (bank statements or overdraft agreement etc) and a date will be set for when the case will be heard fully and where. No indication will be given of what the judge thinks at this point or whose favour, its really a matter of setting a date in the diary for a full hearing and for the judge to tell you what he wants you to bring with you etc.

The bank will probably send you something shortly before the hearing detailing what orders they want the judge to make. These are basically like requests put to the judge, he doesnt have to agree to them. For now I would just wait and see what orders the bank intend to ask the judge to make. You may find that closer to the date they will make you a revised offer.

 

 

Please see http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html which gives excellent info on what should be sent to court to influence the judge to raise directions in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

Hi

 

Hope you can help I got a general form of judgement or order from dartford county court. This was a surprise as knew nothing about going to court for anything .

It's states :

Upon application of 12tg June having not been lodged at court until 17th June the claimant ( south east water) having failed to comply with CPR 71.3 or 71.5

 

It is ordered that

1- application dismissed

 

2- the court has made this order of it own initiative . You are entitled to apply to have this order set aside, varied, or stayed but must do so within 7 days from the day on which us order is served upon you or such a other period as may be directed above

 

Dated 13th June

 

This is all this letter says and I can get hold of dartford court to find out what this is what I do!!!

 

I've now had a bailiff at my door twice demanding money and I'm not sure wether I should be paying something or not as I read the letter that it got thrown out of court and the bailiff letters have that it went to court in February!!! I'm very confused and if anyone can help I'd be really thankful

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...