Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Would You Believe It!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received full amount of my claim in to my closed account yesterday,(1271.76 - 318 overdraft=£1589.76) one day before the return date of my summary cause. I went into the bank today to tell them I would like to withdraw the full amount and after a few telephone calls I was told that I wouldn't be seeing any of the money!! I was in a bit of shock but it turns out that the loan and credit card I had few years back and which are part of a protected trust deed, is stopping me from receiving my cash. They told me the only way I would get any money from them is if I show a council tax or rent letter saying I am in arrears and need the money:? . I now feel as if the BOS is now bending me over a barrel big time. Surely this is not allowed as ultimately the bank have arrested my money and will not give it to me! I have not contacted the court yet to state that I have received the money. I was thinking would it be possible to have the case ruled in my favour and then get the sherriff officers to collect my money from the bank? any advice would be most grateful I have went from cloud nine today to back down in the dumps!!!:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid if you receive addition money, as in this case, it would appear that it transfers to the Trustee.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emo67

 

Rory is right if the trust deed is still in force then the money will be kept by the bank (although you should inform your trustee as they will want to know).

 

However if the deed has been formally discharged then the bank cannot keep the money as the debt no longer exists, if this is the case then I would contact the bank and your trustee and failing that I would contact the court.

 

Cheers

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]They don't like it up 'em Mr Mannering :-o

 

Abbey Claiming £1241.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requested - 17/02/2007

Prelim sent - 26/03/2007

LBA sent - 13/04/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE!

*** WON *** Cheque recieved 13/9/2007

 

Lloyds TSB Claiming £1335.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 07/03/2007

Prelim sent - 13/04/2007

LBA sent - 03/05/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE

**WON** Cheque received 6/9/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just add that there must be a fair amount of people in this position.

 

We were ourselves in a Trust Deed until release 2/3 years ago.

 

It is a very unfortunate position to be in, one that has been made worse by the banks.

 

I also wish that these adverts with seemingly normal couples and their delightful kids giving wholehearted thumbs up to borrowing gazillions of pounds to consolidate their loans/debts etc whilst lovely soothing music playing in the background would just stop, their not helping!

 

It may be preferrable to wait until release form Trust Deeds before claiming back charges, anyone any idea if there is a time limit after discharge before being able to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst the deed is still in-force and this will be until the discharge has been registered which can take up to 9 months after the actual deed has finished, any assets can be taken by the trustee. They would not normally take money after the three years but they have the power to do so if they believe the money should have been available to trust. Trusts are very compicated and are also very restricting!!!! And should not be entered into without a lot of thought as ALL your assets belong to the trust.

 

Yes it would definitely be better to wait until the discharge has been lodged before beginning any action against the banks. On the other hand it may be better to counter claim the banks before getting into the deed and either avoid the deed alltogether (BEST) or reduce the debt going into the deed. Which may not be as good as it sounds because payments would be the same anyway.

 

Once the deed is discharged the debt is gone so in theory the money is yours however the banks may have other ideas and use scare tactics to try and convince you otherwise. There may be some legal recourse open to the banks as you may be claiming back 100% of charges that you only paid 60% of via the deed, but I have not found anything todate, but someone with a better understanding of scottish law/Deed law may know better.

 

The problem with deeds is that trying to get credit afterwards in almost impossible. you are actually better off after voluntary sequestration (although of course you may have lost your hosue). These companies that tell you the Deed will solve all your problems and take a large admin fee to set it up for you are the same ones that then get you the "best deal" on your re-mortgage at whopping 9% interest.

 

perhaps we should pool our Deed Knowledge and get a sticky post advising people with Deeds what the best course of action is!

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]They don't like it up 'em Mr Mannering :-o

 

Abbey Claiming £1241.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requested - 17/02/2007

Prelim sent - 26/03/2007

LBA sent - 13/04/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE!

*** WON *** Cheque recieved 13/9/2007

 

Lloyds TSB Claiming £1335.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 07/03/2007

Prelim sent - 13/04/2007

LBA sent - 03/05/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE

**WON** Cheque received 6/9/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received full amount of my claim in to my closed account yesterday,(1271.76 - 318 overdraft=£1589.76) one day before the return date of my summary cause. I went into the bank today to tell them I would like to withdraw the full amount and after a few telephone calls I was told that I wouldn't be seeing any of the money!! I was in a bit of shock but it turns out that the loan and credit card I had few years back and which are part of a protected trust deed, is stopping me from receiving my cash. They told me the only way I would get any money from them is if I show a council tax or rent letter saying I am in arrears and need the money:? . I now feel as if the BOS is now bending me over a barrel big time. Surely this is not allowed as ultimately the bank have arrested my money and will not give it to me! I have not contacted the court yet to state that I have received the money. I was thinking would it be possible to have the case ruled in my favour and then get the sherriff officers to collect my money from the bank? any advice would be most grateful I have went from cloud nine today to back down in the dumps!!!:evil: [Was the loan and credit card you had with BOS or another company? I'm claiming against A&L for bank charges, and also have a trust deed, but A&L were not one of my creditors. Would they be able to keep the money for my trust deed if I get an offer from them??]
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops made a bit of an ar$e of that :p

 

Was the loan and credit card you had with BOS or another company? I'm claiming against A&L for bank charges, and also have a trust deed, but A&L were not one of my creditors. Would they be able to keep the money for my trust deed if I get an offer from them??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deneedenee

 

As A&L are not part of your trust they will not be able to keep your bank charges refund unless of course you owe them money say an o/d in which case they will almost certainly deduct this from you refund.

 

HOWEVER when you enter into a trust deed you in effect for the term of the trust (usually three years) sign over all your current and future assets to the trustee including your salary, house, car and possessions and any windfalls i.e lottery wins inheritances etc and I believe a refund of charges would almost certainly be regarded as such and would need to be placed in the trust.

 

The trustee has discretion with regards to which assets are kept in trust things like cars which you need to do your job, unless they are brand new and paid for are usually disregarded because there value at the end of the trust is not usually enough to warrant them being sold. The same goes for furniture and electrical goods because they are just not worth the effort of selling. You are allowed to keep a portion of your salary to pay for bills rent/mortgage etc. The rest is usually placed into the trust with regular monthly payments.

 

So if you recieve a sum of money (in this case the refund) you are duty bound to notify the trustee. This is usually done via 6 monthly updates where you fill in a questionaire detailing income and outgoings. You could of course decide not to tell the trustee and I'm sure many many people do do this i.e over-exagerate outgoings under-estimate salary (pay slips are usually checked). BUT the outcome could be very serious with the trustee ending up sequestering(sic) you and thus seizing all your assets and leaving you up "pooh river without a propulsion device" or more likely extending the term of the trust and forcing you to pay more money in from your salary.

 

I know this leaves you between a rock and a hard place and I'm sure that the money from A&L would mean a big difference and make some things in life easier but please be aware what could happen if you do not tell the trustee and they find out, remember they can ask for bank statements from you.

 

This is becoming a bit of a ramble but two more things:

 

1. You may be able to argue that the money is merely replacing money you should not have paid and is therfore not a windfall but I'm not sure how easy this would be.

 

2. You are entitled to make repairs to property/assets etc and you could say the money is needed for this.

 

Cheers

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]They don't like it up 'em Mr Mannering :-o

 

Abbey Claiming £1241.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requested - 17/02/2007

Prelim sent - 26/03/2007

LBA sent - 13/04/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE!

*** WON *** Cheque recieved 13/9/2007

 

Lloyds TSB Claiming £1335.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 07/03/2007

Prelim sent - 13/04/2007

LBA sent - 03/05/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE

**WON** Cheque received 6/9/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thanks very much for your help - again!!

 

A&L closed my account back in Jan this year and I had to clear my overdraft then, so if I get any money back from them, I'm not due them any of it.

 

That's good to know that I can say I'm using the money for repairs to property, cos that's what I'm going to do with the money - should I ever get it back from A&L?!?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...