Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hope vs barclays


hope0715
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have been viewing this great site for sometime

here is my case to date

 

DPA letter sent 25th April 2006, had phone call within a couple of days to say statements were at my local branch for collection. No charge.

 

Preliminary Approach letter sent for £500.00 18th May 2006

Recieved letter back from Mike Brophy saying that they would look at complaint and would get back to me by 16th June. No call recieved to date so

LBA letter sent 13th June

The account was closed in 2004 so i dont have to worry about them closing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update:

 

I have recieved a letter back from Barclays today, it appears to be a standard letter that other members of the Barclays Bank Action Group have recieved, however they have stated in mine ' In light of the above I am unable to agree to a refund of any of the £480.00 charged to the above account from 2000 until the account was closed in 2005.

Which is all very well but i am claiming back £500.00 (obviously a bank which can't add up either!)

 

They have also stated that if they do not hear from me within 8 weeks they will consider the complaint resolved.

 

Do i still wait the 14 days as i stated in my LBA or do i now go straight ahead as i have now recieved a reply ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update:

 

' In light of the above I am unable to agree to a refund of any of the £480.00 charged to the above account from 2000 until the account was closed in 2005.

 

What was the statement above?

 

Hek:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was the last paragraph in their standard letter. I have noticed from other users that this is where Barclays have normally offered some sort of payment, but in my case they are not offering a penny and have even reduced my claim by 20.00. i have added it up again and my claim is £500.00! not the 480.00 as they have stated. i hope this makes it clearer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very new and inexperienced, maybe a mod could offer more advice.

 

In some other threads I have read they have promised a reply by xxxx date (usually after the 14 days we've set) and it has been recommended to wait to show the court you have given them ample time for response, but in your case this seems to be the final response from them.

 

I would suggest you now file your claim.

 

May be best to wait for confirmation from a mod though!!

 

Hek:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also no authority on this matter, but, i believe that if they have not given indication that they are going to respond further to that letter then i would suggest you follow this up with the next stage I.E LBA. As you only requested that they respond in your previous letter they have fulfilled their current obligations.

 

Hope this helps.

 

 

*** After re-reading your post, i see you have actually sent the LBA, in which case yes you should probably begin to file your claim as they have obviously dismissed your initial claim. ***

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now worked out charges plus the 8 per cent. i am about to submit my claim via moneyclaim but i have noticed in the statement you have to give the date the account was opened. I telephoned barclays yesterday but they have told me as it was longer than 6 years ago when i opened it (i think it was in 1989) they state they are unable to give me the date i opened the account. Can I either miss that bit out or estimate the date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received An Acknowledgemet of service from the court regarding Barclays today

signed by Keith Jeremiah dated 28th June 2006 They intend to defend all of the claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just a quick question, I sent my allocation questionnaire back to my local court on 7th august. was not due till the 16th august but so far have not heard anything about a court date yet

does anyone know how long it takes for the court to write back with a court date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent mine on 2nd August and am still waiting. I did ring the Court and now think I may get an answer in the next few days.

Something tells me that the Courts may just be having a few extra cases to deal with so will take abit longer to reply. It is also possible that they are trying to bunch together Bank claims into one day of hearings.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Final stretch in sight now!

 

Keep going - nearly there.

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...