Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bankrupt and Nat West closed joint account with no notification


princess56
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6147 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a joint account with Nat West and I was made bankrupt at the beginning of June. I know that any overdraft etc falls to my husband, jointly and severally etc. The point I am getting to is that a day before my husband got paid he found out that Nat West closed our account without informing him. His wages are now "floating" and he has the hassle of trying to get another account opened. Will my bankruptcy have an adverse reaction to my husband opening an account in his name only?

 

As soon as I was made bankrupt I had informed the bank that I was now bankrupt and i was told by numerous people at Nat West I was told that the joint account would be closed and that another account would probably be opened in my husband's name only.

 

My husband spoke to someone Thursday evening at NatWest and was told that his details were now with Debt Management and that there had been no default charges put on the account yet!!

 

After being with Nat West for 20 plus years we feel that we have been treated really badly. What recourse of action can my husband now take to avoid further interest and charge being added to the account as he has not been made bankrupt.

 

Can he also chase for bank charges on his own?

 

Sorry for it to be so long winded but any help would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("941758") report.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My husband was made Bankrupt in 2000 we had a joint account, he had to sign to relinquish his side of the account to me, he could not have a account during the three years the banruptcy ran, at the time he had Nat West credit cards that was included in the bankruptcy, that are still on his credit history as defaulted, even though all creditors were paid in full, at the same time we had a loan in joint names that fell to me to continue to pay, because i was only working part time Nat West made me take out a new loan over five years which i have just finished paying, which i will be looking to reclaim any charges as soon as my current claim is sorted, In short i uppose i'm saying dont expect any help from Nat west, the best thing your hubby can do is open a savings account, i know the Alliance & Leicester will take bankrupts on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiThanks for coming back to me. It is me that is bankrupt not my husband. He tried to open a account with Nationwide and was refused. I spoke to Nat West and they informed me that my husband cannot have an account with him because of adverse credit info. Is there any other Bank that will take him on do you know. He needs a bank with direct debits etc.Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Princess,

 

It may be a good idea for your husband to check his credit file (e.g., experian) to see what information has been put against his name. If he's struggling to open a bank account with direct debits on it, it may be that he does have something like a default against his name.

 

With regards to the question in your 1st post asking if your husband can reclaim bank charges on his own - the answer is yes if it's his own account only. If it's a joint account, the answer is no as the potential reclaim on bank charges would be classed as an "asset" (even though it was unrealised at the time) that could have been used to repay creditors. If all of your creditors have now been repaid in full though, then yes, he'd be able to reclaim the charges. It's quite confusing to get your head round this at first - but it's better to be safe than sorry!

 

Hope this helps a little, hedgey xx

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiThanks for coming back to me. It is me that is bankrupt not my husband. He tried to open a account with Nationwide and was refused. I spoke to Nat West and they informed me that my husband cannot have an account with him because of adverse credit info. Is there any other Bank that will take him on do you know. He needs a bank with direct debits etc.Thanks

 

Try this bank they are very good, you actually speak to people that make decisions not computers, also they reconcile at the end of the day, not at Midnight.Whiteaway Laidlaw Bank Limited

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...