Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LLoyds Banks Irresponsblie Lending


barcaboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6149 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Can anyone give me any advice as to tackling LloydsTSB with Irresponsible Lending,

Over the past few years they have given me Credit cards 3 loans Overdraft then when i got into trouble Offered my father a big loan against his property to help me out,

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

Can anyone give me any advice as to tackling Lloyds TSB with Irresponsible Lending,

Over the past few years they have given me Credit cards 3 loans Overdraft then when i got into trouble Offered my father a big loan against his property to help me out,

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a now retired banker I may be able to advise, however I would need more information.

 

For instance:

 

How was the lending irresponsible?

 

What was your level of borrowing re: income?

 

Was the lending offered or requested?

 

etc etc

2007 Issues ALL RESOLVED

2008 Issues ALL RESOLVED

£4,200 in charges claimed back succesfully from a total of 5 Creditors

2009 Issues ALL RESOLVED

NEXT Directory - No Agreement, No Further Action **WON**

2010 Issues

Court Claim from Black Horse - AOS 22.11.10, CPR 23.11.10

Assisting Daughter with Employment Tribunal for Wrongful Dismissal/Discrimination

 

:) My Head is officially out of the Sand :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for reply,

It started about 6-7 years ago with Lloyds when i aske for a loan of £6000 which they gave me,

Then when i needed more about two years later they suggested a seperate loan of £20,000 then a year after that they contacted me to say we can do something with your existing £20,000 loan as interest rates changed or something so i went in and they changed this one to a £25,000 loan,

On top of this i had a Gold Credit card which started off at £3500 BUT THEY KEPT INCREASING TO £8,000

Then they upgraded my account to a Platinum Account and also with Platinum credit card which started of £5,000 limit but crept up to £9,000,

They gave me an overdraft originaly of £2,000 but then that they let me increase to £6,000,

All this for a self employed builder on about £25k which they knew as they hold our family Business account,

Obviousley this all got me into trouble and I went to them saying i needed help what can i do,

So they suggested My Father take out £70,000 against the property of his house which he did do,which i try to pay back.

Also they sold me insurance to cover this for about £300 per month,

They are SHARKS

 

Barcaboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, they are in BUSINESS, as for anyone to argue 'irresponsible' lending, there will be others denied access to money to to their 'responsible' lending policies. It would be very difficult as an individual to prove they were negligent, as they could argue they assessed each loan by their criteria and you posed an 'acceptable risk'. Conversely, they could say the borrower also has to be responsible enough to know when they're being overstretched!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for reply,

It started about 6-7 years ago with Lloyds when i aske for a loan of £6000 which they gave me,

Then when i needed more about two years later they suggested a seperate loan of £20,000 then a year after that they contacted me to say we can do something with your existing £20,000 loan as interest rates changed or something so i went in and they changed this one to a £25,000 loan,

On top of this i had a Gold Credit card which started off at £3500 BUT THEY KEPT INCREASING TO £8,000

Then they upgraded my account to a Platinum Account and also with Platinum credit card which started of £5,000 limit but crept up to £9,000,

They gave me an overdraft originaly of £2,000 but then that they let me increase to £6,000,

All this for a self employed builder on about £25k which they knew as they hold our family Business account,

Obviousley this all got me into trouble and I went to them saying i needed help what can i do,

So they suggested My Father take out £70,000 against the property of his house which he did do,which i try to pay back.

Also they sold me insurance to cover this for about £300 per month,

They are SHARKS

 

Barcaboy

 

 

Ok, well I've have had a look, but without the FULL details (ie what your income and outgoings were at the time) it will be difficult to PROVE irresponsible lending, and, I have to say, on the face of it, it looks like irresponsible borrowing. I'm going to try and explain, but there will be questions that need answering within this if you are going to persue them for lending to you irresponsibly.

 

I will say that you will be unlikely to like my response to this. However I am concerned that you appear to be landing all the responsibility for this debt at the bank's door and don't seem to be accepting any responsibility for it yourself?

 

Firstly the loans: You borrowed £6k. This is what you asked for and presumably you could show that you could afford it.

 

What would you have done if you had been refused?

 

You state you needed more 2 years later. £14k more. Had you kept your payments up on the original loan. What was the extra £14k for? Could you manage the payments? Did you agree to the Payment Protection?

 

Again, had you been refused, would you have "managed"?

 

This was then "re-jigged" when they contacted you "as interest rates had changed" to £25k. Again what was the extra £5k used for? Did you agree to the larger loan and protection?

 

Secondly the Gold Credit Card:

 

The credit limit was £3500. Presumably you spent this? Did the limit raise as your spending rose?

 

What was this expenditure on? Where would you have got these funds if not the Credit card?

 

Thirdly the Platinum Card:

 

Was this along side the Gold Card? Did you spend up to your limit on this too?

 

Again, What was this expenditure on? Where would you have got these funds if not the Credit card?

 

Fourthly the Overdraft:

 

Was this "pre-arranged" or did they grant it after you went overdrawn? WHY was it increased? Was it your spending that increased first? As they increased it was there some reason why you felt obliged to use it?

 

 

 

You mention that you are/were a self-employed builder on £25k. Were you living beyond your means and therefore "got in to trouble" as the payments became difficult to make?

 

 

When you went to them for help what happened? I'm concerned that you state they simply offered to lend your Father the money. Why was your Father involved? Or was it that you realised that you had overstretched yourself and therefore knew that the only person who could help you was your Father? Presumably he offered his help?

 

£25 K Loan

£6k Overdraft

£9k Credit Card

£8k Credit Card

 

This totals: £48K

 

Why was the figure borrowed by your Father £70k?

 

 

 

At the risk of sounding like I'm lecturing, none of this adds up. If you are to accuse the bank of irresponsible lending then I think you should explain exactly why you think they were irresponsible.

 

Did you tell them HONESTLY what you income and outgoings were and therefore what you could afford each month? Or did you, as many do, massage the figures slightly in order to get the lending you required? Therefore, in effect, borrowing more than you can afford.

 

The level of borrowing is at £48k. Have you had the benefit of these funds over the years?

 

Did the bank coerce you to take this borrowing? Did they coerce you into spending it? I doubt it.

 

 

Believe it or not I do feel for you. It cannot be pleasant knowing that you have a debt of £70K to your Father, secured on his home, and having to make the repayment to him every month. However, I think it's important that you accept that YOU have some responsibility here and that, basically, you spent the money and therefore have to "bite the bullet" and pay it back.

 

It is with the benefit of hindsight that you now realise you should not have taken on such borrowing. However, I don't think it's healthy to try and shift the responsibility solely to the bank.

 

My advice is this:

 

If you have incurred charges on any of these accounts you should go about claiming them back and using the proceeds to reduce your overall debt.

 

Do an SAR on each of agreement to ensure that you are aware of the terms etc and to ensure that the agreements are enforceable.

 

Look at your monthly finances, cover your essentials and the loan with your Father and ensure that you are living within your means in future.

 

 

 

I'm sorry if my answer disappoints you, but without evidence to the contrary this looks like a case of irresponsible borrowing, not lending.

2007 Issues ALL RESOLVED

2008 Issues ALL RESOLVED

£4,200 in charges claimed back succesfully from a total of 5 Creditors

2009 Issues ALL RESOLVED

NEXT Directory - No Agreement, No Further Action **WON**

2010 Issues

Court Claim from Black Horse - AOS 22.11.10, CPR 23.11.10

Assisting Daughter with Employment Tribunal for Wrongful Dismissal/Discrimination

 

:) My Head is officially out of the Sand :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...