Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DF vs Lloyds TSB Bank


bex1408
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

I'm also helping my df to claim back his lloyds tsb charges (sometimes i wish i'd never offered lol i'm knee deep now).

 

Anyway, i sent the allocation questionnaire off on Monday. But today i've received a letter from Sechiari solicitors which reads:

 

we act for lloyds tsb bank

 

we have been passed a copy of the proceedings that you have issued against our client in Birmingham County Court. The bank will be defending the proceedings on the following grounds

 

1. The fees that you seek are properly incorporated into your contact with the bank, and

2. by making payments (whether by cheque, debit card or any other means) from your account where you have insufficient funds to cover them, you are making a request to the bank for an increased overdraft, which the bank may meet or decline. If it meets your request you must pay the necessary charges,. The issue of penalties only arises as a matter of law, where there has been a breach of contract

 

looking ahead, a situation which gives rise to a dispute is not one the bank wishes to continue, in view of this, you are requested, please, to make contact within the next 14 days with the branch manager at the billericay branch on 0845.... to review your account, A review may be useful to consider whether your current banking arrangements are the most appropriate for your needs

 

We await confirmation from the bank that this action has been taken

 

Should he call them, i'd rather he didn't and everything is dealt with in writing. Also, should i be worried? I'm not bothered about them closing the account as he only uses it for his work expenses and i already have another account lined up just incase. I've just never seen anything like this and am starting to panic a little bit.

 

Any advice would be massively appreciated.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bex - I've had exactly the same letter today and I live in Swansea! Phoned them and they told me a load of these letters have gone out in error (Billericay in Essex is a bit far to expect me to go to from Wales!) and he confirmed that a settlement letter has been sent to me on the same day this one was. Give them a ring and ask them to see if this is the case with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update....

 

DF called solicitors this morning like you suggested and they've sent out a settlement letter on the same day for what sounded like the full amount :D

 

Just waiting for the postman now :mad: lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nestie

 

Just wondered if you could tell me how long it took for you to receive your offer letter? DF is still to receive his, we've called them and they said they'd send another copy but couldn't fax one as it would have took them ages to locate his paper file. I'm getting impatient :p

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again

 

The letter has finally come from the solicitors.

 

The offer is £100 (the AQ fee) short. I'm not really fussed about this tbh, i'd rather just take the money. However, the offer letter lists the following conditions which i'm really not sure we should be accepting. Does he just cross them out before returning them or will that make them withdraw their offer??

 

Conditions are.

 

1. The amount will be credited to df lloyds tsb account - fine with this

2. The payment is in full and final settlement - fine with this

3. The terms of this agreement are confidential to the parties and their legal representatives :evil:

4. You agree to maintain your accounts with the bank within your agreed limits and in accordance with the terms that govern the account :evil:

5. You can avoid these fees in future if you agree an increase in your overdraft with the bank before you try and make payments that would take you over any previously agreed limits. If you do not do so, you will again incur these fees :evil:

6. You make contact with your local lloyds tsb branch manager on .... to arrange a review of your account. The bank wishes to avoid further situations which give rise to disputes. A review may be useful to consider whether your current banking arrangements are the most appropriate with your needs :evil:

7. You must notify the court immediately once payment has been made and provide a copy of your letter to the court for our records - am fine with this

 

Any suggestions?? Thanks everyone in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!!:-D :-D

There is a letter in the link below to send to the Solicitors rejecting the conditions:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bcard-woolwich-successes/48032-jakena-barclays-4.html?highlight=acceptance#post718754

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...