Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Beware Of Yorkshire Stalling Us!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6137 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having received my six years worth of statements, having then sent a letter requesting being refunded, having received a NO REPLY (letter with some form of signature; but no printed name!) I discovered that my cash point card suddenly become un-operable and that I should contact the bank for advice.

 

Rather than phone them as they usually request, I sent them instead and as per usual for me, a letter via registered post, asking why I was not able to have access to my funds and could they respond in writing... Well no letter(no surprise there as the manager never contacts me personally unless of course its a computer generated advice note, probably unknown to him or is it her? that was sent! But I did discover my card to suddenly be working again........

 

The joys of dealing with bullies, only thing is I am not claiming a refund for the money but for the principal.

 

One other thought that occurs to me, is why some individuals get a refund with no quible and others have to fight. Is this not some form of prejudice? Its worth considering don't you think?

 

Well I have not rushed my claim and my last letter to them is that if I am not re-imbursed by a set date disclosed to them then I will raise a claim with the small claims court for a figure just over £4900.00:D

 

Can I just also add that my letter pointed out that I am happy to go to court and allow the judge to make a formal but in-partial decision and what will be will be.

 

Good luck to all my fellow claiments and those feeling daunted by the whole process. If I can do it, then so can you.

 

Gogivit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having been studying these sites, I cam accross one thread where a person asked the following question...

 

If the bank refuses to refund the charges as requested (quite typically several weeks pass by) you then can file a claim in the small claims court; However is it true that when you do this, you have to adjust your figure? My reason to ask this is because I am initially requesting a refund for charges from the period January 2001 to January 2007.

 

But obviously many weeks have passed by and we are in March. I intend to raise my claim with Yorkshire Bank on about 4th April 2007 so should I therefore addjust the period and total request for refund?(in other words claim from the period April 4th 2001 to present)

 

I feel this is an important question and needs claryfying as it may be deemed a technicality.

 

Please advise if you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GOGIVIT, NO you DONT change your dates, this is because you notified them of your intentions to claim back any charges that were found to be punitive in nature and not a true reflection of their costs in relation to a breach of contract, if this wasnt allowed then the banks could drag claims on to their advantage. The schedule of charges you have sent them can be added to up to the day you file at court for the most latest charges.

Hope this clarifies the situation for you, your start date never changes from when you informed them of your intentions.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in October last year, I arranged a direct debit with NTL now Virgin. However they messed up my direct debit date which through spiral effect cost me £250.00 penalty charges from my bank (YORKSHIRE). After about 15 phone calls and 3 letters sent to Virgin media today they have credited my media account with £250.00!

 

The moral of this story, is don't give in to these BIG BOYS. IF YOU PERSIST YOU'LL GET WHAT YOUR OWED...

 

Now I am waiting to take on the bank........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheeky, but I see where you're coming from.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if any members like myself never get a reponse from the bank manager. I have written many letters and always request a written response but to no avail.

 

I was wondering if this may be worth mentioning to the courts (I will shortly be processed) also do all branches have managers because when I do recieve a letter from my bank manager (topic regarding overdrawn), it always appears to be from Leeds! Surely this is not cost effective to post from Leeds when it would be cheaper to send letters locally?

 

Could my bank manager be commuting from Leeds to Luton everyday? Could he or is it she (I do not know) be a computer generated thing from another dimension?

 

It is interesting to note that after the BBC1 investigation Wistleblower, Barclays Bank responded to concerns via their website, however the Yorkshire Bank have said nothing!

 

Maybe like bank charges, the computer doesnt switch on until a set day of each month thus keeping its costs (say £0.40) to a maximum and therefore we may get a response sometime soon!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yorkshire Bank have today advised me that after my second complaint they are reviewing my complaint.

 

They assure me that every effort is being made to bring my complaint to a satisfactory conclusion!

 

It prompted me to respond by a further letter...

 

The new letter states why Ive received further charges for a direct debit I never authorised :) and why my branch manager never responds to any of my letters.

 

Will keep you posted on all my progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that, YB set up a direct debit on my account without me filling in a mandate or authorizing them to do so, i instructed them to stop paying it which they did two months latter and then started charging me £35.00 each month for not paying it, any way upshot is i finally got the payments refunded when they couldn't come up with proof i had set it up, but they still haven't refunded the charges, but that will be sorted soon. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please stick to one thread as it is easier for the rest of us to follow your progress.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Having innitially requested a refund from my bank and told NO! I wrote back and sunsequently received a letter saying that it would be further investigated. However during the wait and at looking at this site, I have since sent another letter to the bank requesting further bank statements dating from the opening of my account (1994ish) to 2001 period.

 

A letter recieved yesterday from the bank yesterday says they will send me these in due course so I now wait in anticipation.

 

Off topic, I have been taking things a bit slow and so far the whole process has taken about 10 weeks with yet no conclusion but my partner who banks with the Woolwich has in the space of 2 weeks recieved an offer!

 

Can I also say that ive since bought the book "Small claims Procedure A practical Guide" of this site and it has taught me things I never considered or understood therefore I recommend others to do so too.

 

I am estimating my claim to be £5000 before any interest will be awarded therefore I have to prepare myself for the small claims court and hope you lovely people will support me.

 

I am firm that I will not settle for anything less than 100% payout and any interest owed.

 

I am still unsure of the claiming of charges prior to the 6 year rule but will continue to monitor others progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gog

 

I am in a very similar position to yourself regarding Yks. After a megarow over charges in 2001/2 they closed the account and the OD was paid off. For the 6-year reason, I hadn't looked at this as a claim yet because I have other bigger ones.

 

However, having read BankFodder's comments about going beyond 6 years I fished out all the old statements (sad I know, but I was self employed so kept them). With some interest going back more than 10 years, this still tots up to about 2k, so well worth going for.:p

 

My calcs are done and the prelim Letter will be for everything. I'm not entirely clear whether we should be going for 6+ for everything yet (conflicting messages), but for Yorks I think its OK because they figured on the Whistleblower programme, and so we have the clear evidence of the true charges being 1-50ish rather than 30 quid or whatever.

 

While the letters are pending I'll be looking in detail at the wording of the court papers. I think the only real difference is that you cite the Act of Concealment as sufficient justification for overriding the Limitation Act. Anyway, I will be starting a thread soon, so it looks like we'll be riding the same train! Contact me if I can help in any way.

 

Varangian Guard

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Under the data protection act you are entitled to your terms and conditions. Write to them and inform them of this.If they cannot or willnot supply them it makes your case alot stronger if you have to go to court.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Parkvale,

 

Today I will be sending a letter registered post advising them of this. It has not deterred me in any way.

 

I have just received a cheque for £200 as gesture of goodwill and happily returning it to them today :D .

 

Next week I should be receiving my statements from 1993 to 2001 period and cant wait (though I accept 1994 may be earliest date they have).

 

Once I have these statements then with those currently in my possesion from 2001 to 2007 period then I begin the kill!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Onwards and upwards. :)

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I have returned the cheque to YB solicitors. I pointed out that the £200 doesn't even go to cover my paper usage, my computer ink, my time and effort, postage costs etc and will continue with my claim regardless.

 

I pointed out that their customer services officer has advised me that my t & c's were destroyed years ago and that I feel this warrents investigation (shame they cant destroy terms and condition agreements for mortgages!:) )

 

Also wrote to my bank demanding date and details regarding why my T & C was destroyed and pointed out that I have not signed any other agreement and am not aware of any other updated terms / conditions from my original form!

 

Of course I have considered my branch customer services officer may have lied but on that note I am wondering if maybe I should have her summonsed to court as a witness :D to explain why she has lied! Time will tell.

 

Hopefully she will confirm in writing what she clearly stated verbally!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having requested my statements for the period (start of account to 2001) I have instead been issued with duplicate copies for the period (2001 to 2006 which I already have)! It is interesting to note that the headed paper that accompanied the copies has no date reference.

 

OBVIOUSLY A STALLING PRACTICE BY YORKSHIRE BANK!

 

Once again I will be stalled for another 6 - 8 weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I wrote (so maybe others do not make same mistake)?

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Re. Account number xxxxxxxxxxx sort code xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am writing to request a fully comprehensive list of all default charges for direct debit, unauthorised overdrafts and standing orders I have paid from the period when I first opened my account to the period of 31st December 2000.

 

 

Was this no good then? (so others do not make same mistake)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...