Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wednesday vs Citi Cards


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 249
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well back from court..................

 

I must of been in there for about 6 mins :D

 

Eversheds didnt turn up, it went a long the lines of

 

Judge: Take a seat

Me: Thanks

Judge: Im happy to lift the stay :D

 

Got what i wanted with her second sentence.

 

She did comment that she was surprised that they didnt turn up to argue the toss, i replied that i was'nt.

 

Anyway the Judge has implented the draft directions.Just changed the last one, to say if they fail to disclose costs, no order needs to me made, shell judge in my favour.

 

So now i have 3 weeks to supply a breakdown of my charge and copies of statements?

 

The Judge because of Christmas, gave Citi til the end of January to disclose their costs, if they dont, i win :)

 

So hopefully that should be that?

 

Printed out about 200 pages of stuff for today, didnt even get chance to open my file :D

 

Forgot to ask about the £40 charge for todays hearing, also had to take a day off work, can i recoup these?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news.......

 

Firstly i'll get over my guide to compiling a bundle for your claim against Citi.

 

Second, IMPORTANT: send your bundle to Citi by special delivery - does that go directly to Eversheds as they nolonger use the Salford offices by the sound of it.

 

Third, you should be able to apply for a wasted costs order, if they dont comply with the courts order to supply a breakdown of costs you could compile the figures and supply it when they default on the court order..... to include your days missed wages from hearing, postage & packing etc, paper, ink etc. Though obviously dont be too greedy.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah the Judge said i should send a copy to court and one to Eversheds.

 

Should i add the cost of todays hearing onto the bottom of the spreadsheet along with the filing costs? To give a total balance and calculate interest upto the date Eversheds have to supply everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When Eversheds go into default recalculate your spreadsheet, updating interest and add the court fees to the bottom as you are legally entitled to those.

 

Next create a seperate spreadsheet totalling up your costs, putting your days wages and any other costs identifying them and the dates incurred - retain receipts for anything sizeable, obviously put your days lost wages at the top.

 

Then when you contact the court to state that Eversheds have not complied, send in your update spreadsheet of charges etc, and request to apply for a wasted costs order.

 

Dont forgtet to RETAIN the SPECIAL DELIVERY SLIP when sending your bundle to Eversheds - had the crafty so & so's at Citi Salford say that I hadn't complied with the draft order in my claim, the Royal Mail confirmation and slip said otherwise.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question :D

 

Will the court send me a copy of the Judges directions?

 

Also is consensus now that, its just a matter of waiting til the end of January for Eversheds to enter default, or is it likely they may try and throw a few more spanners in the works?

 

I did suggest to the Judge that they might reapply for another stay, as per other threads, but she said they wont get one as they failed to show for this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another :D

 

This is for charges and default removal, so if they dont comply, i win charges and default removal.

 

There is still an outstanding balance on the account, it is roughly 60% of what im claiming. However when i cca'd them, they have failed to provide anything. So if i win, do they send a cheque or the remaining difference between the two sums? Also if they send a cheque, remove the default, could they reapply one to the outstanding amount, if i then offered them say 25% of the outstanding balance to settle the account, would they likely accept.

 

Its just obviously if i get the default removed, i dont want them to issue another one virtually straight away. Or should i just pay the full balance off, even though they dont have an agreement?

 

I dont mind paying the full balance, because the remaining monies would be offered to other creditors as a full and final settlement on the promises they remove their defaults, as again they dont have any agreements. Obviously only paying 25% give me more to pay others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep court will send directions to you.

 

With regard to default removal, did you include under which legislation you require this to happen etc in your claim (i.e. Data Protection Act 1998). The default will be unlawful because it is inaccurate in that it includes unlawful penalty charges.

 

You will likely receive a disposal hearing date, so would raise this at hearing.

 

If an account has already been defaulted once, it was my opinion that it cant be subsequently defaulted - albeit if you are maintaining payments I could be wrong. You will have to defer to someone with better knowledge in this area.

 

They havent supplied me with a copy of my executed agreement either, so are legally unentitled to enforce the agreement, however have proceeded to charge interest/penalty charges and stated their intention to default me.... so take it that Citi operate as a law unto themselves and will pretty much do whatever they want - legal or not.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the CCA, i havent heard a word off Citi for months, maybe even over a year, no statements, nothing at all. Not chasing me for anything. Dont know if that has to do with the court case, or lack of CCA.

 

My POC reads such for the default.

 

As the Default amount is solely made up of unlawful charges, the recorded amount is inaccurate. So the default needs to be removed in accordance with Section 14 of the Data Protection Act 1999.

 

Is/Was that enough?

Edited by wednesday1867
Link to post
Share on other sites

You will get a copy of the order yes.

Unless it says defendants at liberty to apply (for stay to be lifted)..then theyve no chance.

 

Your default removal has been done as per the protocols s10 etc.

Its a case of not signing discontiunence or accepting as full settlement UNTIL they sort out default issues.

 

A wasted costs order is usually filed AFTER judgement,and can be done by letter,but better done on notice,of course including the fee for lodging it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the CCA, i havent heard a word off Citi for months, maybe even over a year, no statements, nothing at all. Not chasing me for anything. Dont know if that has to do with the court case, or lack of CCA.

 

My POC reads such for the default.

 

As the Default amount is solely made up of unlawful charges, the recorded amount is inaccurate. So the default needs to be removed in accordance with Section 14 of the Data Protection Act 1999.

 

Is/Was that enough?

 

Since its in litigation and therefore dispute status,they could not resume enforcement.

The absence of the CCA request is likely to be they havnt got it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres a problem here specifically that the unlawfulness of charges has not been determined conclusively.(OFT Case)

However the continuence to process your data is one that you can use.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still haven't had the directions off the court, i'm gonna give them a bell tomorrow and see if they are or have sent them out.

 

When the Judge went over the draft directions, she renumbered them and rewrote them, i didnt see them, so obviously i can only go on the draft directions.

 

That being the case, where can i find assistance with these 2 points:

 

• c) A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise

 

• d) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could take some time to go through the court, but certainly doesnt harm phoning to ask.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well sods law states the day i ring them, its the same day the directions turns up :)

 

Well here they are

 

1 The stay is removed :)

 

2. Schedule of Charges (Done)

Copies of Statements (Done)

 

A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise (Not Done, Where to start)

 

Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon. (Not Done, Where to Start)

 

Im only here for a minute, as im off to watch Wednesday (win) :)

 

I'd like to get the last two done over the next few nights, so i can get it all in the post and done and dusted.

 

 

Also lastdirection for them reads

 

If the defendant fails to comply with this order, the defence will be struck out and judgement will be entered for the claimant without further order of the court.

 

So i take it i should receive their bundle before their deadline, if i or the court dont receive it, what happens?

 

Thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good result so far.

I am at the same stage.

Enron has given me a list but some of the photobucket links are unreadable.I have until December 24th to do mine hearing is set for February.

In view of the other sides monitoring here-its not advisable to be putting anything up which will give them benefit.

Therefore I will be emailing you.

 

Martin

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me know which documents are unreadable, and i'll try my best to improve. From memory there is one quoting that penalty charges are a sanction which is a bit poor.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know-the Citi claimant we were trying to find ha now surfaced -so its possible that he may have some better quality stuff failing that Gary K will surely have it.

I was meaning to ask-Wednesday....does your claim concern the old associates card or the later Citicard ?

Its just for the terms and conditions.

Let us know

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have Associates Terms & Conditions (listed as part of the Citigroup), which effectively states they have the right to pass their costs onto you.

 

Thing is the individual cost of an automated process as part of a large IT system is negligible. A Yorkshire Bank whistleblower putting its least cost for an automated process at 2.5p, and highest cost at £2.50 for a process involving human involvement.

 

We also have it from Brian Smith solicitor who was working on behalf of Citi at the time that the penalty charge is a sanction, i.e. there to stop you doing it again.

 

Citi have submitted cost exhibits to court stating that they're costs are £12.88, £13.47 and £25.74.... but have never been willing to substantial this, an action which if their charges were correct would allow them to pass the full cost onto customers.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still having bother trying to put this together.

 

I don't feel i need to do a full bundle at this stage, as my directions are quite specific, or am i wrong, why do i need to do a full bundle?

 

I cant see what covers this on here or within the full bundle, am i being thick?

 

A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise

 

 

Now the last part

 

Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

 

I still can only find one spreadsheet showing 4 cases against Citi and they arent settled? I take it CitiBank International is different to Citi Cards? Theres some settled cases with Citibank International. Also what kind of legal materials will be required?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking a look.

I am at home all day,and so will be emailing you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...