Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Was at my sisters house yesterday, (my sister had popped out), when the doorbell rang, I answered it and was told the guy standing at the door was a bailiff. Told him I wasnt my sister (who he had asked for), yet he still proceeded to tell me he was there on behalf of Richmond Borough Council, who had taken my sister to court because her daughter had too many absences at school (a problem which my sister eventually managed to sort out). Anyway the court issued a £100 fine, which she couldnt pay at the time and eventually (stupidly) forgot about. Then in march she received a letter from Bailiffs saying to pay £250 (again couldnt pay) or they would come around. that was the last she heard of it until they turned up 3 months later, yesterday. To cut a long story short, he wasnt going to leave, told him to come back when she was there, the fine by the way is now £350, so she could arrange payment. However, this was not good enough and saw her car sitting in the drive and he said he was gonna take that right there and then and would get the police down to witness it. I at this stage panicked, as she needs the car for work and Ironically to get the kids to school (which is what she was fined for anyway, there is irony there somewhere) and paid her bill with my own credit card, which they then had a nerve to charge me a 3% fee on, at that he left. I couldnt get hold of my sister at the time to ask questions. Now, I know she was stupid to ignore the letter from the bailiffs but she did, think she hoped they would go away. Anyway, could they have taken the car? and can they add £250 to a £100 debt, and finally is there anything she can do to get a refund on those terrible charges.

 

Many thanks for any help, these people are ruthless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, although I explained I was not the person he was looking for, was he allowed to give me all that information, surely that is private?

 

The bailiffs by the way was Drakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe they would be in breach of confidentiality codes by telling you (after you had told them that you were NOT the debtor) the details of the story.

 

If they, for example, leave a letter, they should put it in a sealed envelope addressed to the debtor.

 

Best get some professional advice - CAB perhaps?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also put a written complaint into the bailiffs themselves - keep a copy & send recorded delivery. If they are a member of one of the trade associations ( they have to tell you which one if they are ) then you can complain via them as well. Don't know how much joy you would get though to be honest - local CAB a good call as they may be dealing with many complaints in relation to the same firm of bailiffs...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid by credit card I'd suggest you might have an arguement to say that you paid it under duress and you may be able to do a chargeback to the credit card company. I'm not sure what the impact will be on your sister but as they never took the payment from her then I suspect they couldn't blame her for it.

 

No idea what the legality around doing that is though...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i would be inclined to do a bit of reading here.

or maybe use the search at the top on drakes.

 

i believe that there are std fixed charges for a bailiffs visit [they are listed in other msgs i've read] and i dont think £250 is correct.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs/97164-bailiff-fees-just-checking.html?highlight=bailiffs+fees

 

i would ceratainly look at charge back too.

 

as for you not being your sister i would thought that was obvious:D

 

drakes certainly ring a few bells as to being rather suspect it their practice.

 

dx100uk

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i think that you definately have a case for complaint against the balliffs due to the fact as previously stated that they disclosed personal information to someone with nothing to do with the account where the debt was incurred.

 

As for taking the car, i think that they can do this put as he said he would need the police to be present otherwise you can report a theft. Although may need to double check that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

breach of the DPA isnt it?

 

if ANYONE discussed MY financial details with a 3rd party without my express permission I would be sending off letters of complaint etc left right and centre!

 

and before anyone nit picks, it IS DPA cos the baliff will have got the info from an electronic source ;)

claim v natwest WON!

 

all posts made by myself are without prejudice

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it's a breach of DPA

 

Electronic or paper copy, its really classed as any account/person specific information given with consent to company etc

 

which has then been disclosed to someone not entitled to have the information ie; no consent from person it relates to

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...