Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are you being harassed on the telephone by your bank or by debt collectors?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hahaha... Unreal, you really think they (the collectors on the other end of the phone) 'hate it'. As if. You're living in an imaginary world - I'm sure most collectors go home at the end of the day and have a life and forget about their day (and probably have a bit of a laugh when they get verbal from some lowlife), rather than go home and type religiously on forums day-in day-out such as you GodMother.

 

Don't mind me, I just thought I'd see how all you lovely people were getting along - I'm off again for a while, probably to spend some money. KEEP GOING DCAs... Apparently, if the Banks lose the charges court case, customers who don't get into debt might not be entitled to 'free banking' and will instead be charged for standard current accounts. Seeing as only 3% of customers' accounts fall into collections, it doesn't really seem fair that the majority of those who do pay and manage to gain employment and not spend their week's doll money on wide screen televisions and family outings to McDonalds, should be penalised for that 3%.

 

Ciao you lot

 

Personally I laughed when I read this one... she / he has made a point about DCA employees having a life... and the fact they don't worry about work after leaving, this one has clearly proven in what she has typed that’s not the case... enough said.

As regarding doll checks, well, erm... longest unemployment I have ever had was 4 weeks and that was because I had employer who spat his dummy out because I handed him a months notice and he decided to 'relief' me of my duties there and then, but it did cost him 4 weeks wages though :p.

Unlike the DAC (EB) who posted here, she works for someone, however I own my own business so please, before posting unevaluated assumption, think about how uneducated your post actually looks to those who will be reading it J

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh dear it looks like we have a troll again

If referring to me, then I feel you need to expand a little. If you disagree with any of my points, by all means feel free to point it out and I'll respond. But to be fair, I'm just trying to put a different perspective across, I think some of the advice on this site is excellent... some of it however is very poor, and quite frankly quite petty. Adopting an 'us and them' attitude really doesn't help anyone, creditor or debtor, and by suggesting people adopt this view, cease communication and refuse to pay will only box the debtor into a corner.

Edited by Deshaine
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the members on here are wise enough to know whats right and whats wrong. The overwhelming majority of people who have had the misfortune to attempt to 'reason' with a DCA on the telephone have realised what sort of people they end up dealing with. People who are prepared to use every trick, deceit, bullying and downright lies to coerce someone into paying money off an ALLEGED debt wher 99 time out of 100 the greedy DCA cannot enforce it anyway.

 

The best advice is NEVER SPEAK TO A DCA ON THE PHONE. Keep a paper trail of every dealing with them by insisting that ALL contact is in writing.

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know your industry so well....come on tell us who are regarded as the 'cowboys' and tell us who are the good ones....it happens in every industry, I know how good/bad my competitors are...so give your opinion on who are regarded as the cream and those who are regarded as being Mickey Mouse outfits ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:sigh: There are in the region of over 400 independent DCA's operating in the UK, plus all of the inhouse ones on top (many banks have their own dedicated DCA's as I imagine most of you know).

 

It's inevitable some will operate unethically and even in some cases break the law, I completely agree it happens. But what I AM saying is it isn't all of them, and certainly not all of the agents who work for DCA's lie, and I think it's fairly ignorant and ridiculous of yourself to suggest it. In fact, I think you'd be suprised at the quality of some of the peole who work within the collections industry, a job which pretty much is a thankless one. I thought perhaps an adult dicussion could be had on the subject, but apparently not.

 

On the other hand, I'm more than happy to offer any advice to anyone who feels they are being mistreated by a DCA/Creditor. The system isn't perfect, and it is important there is an effective complaint mechanism and way of getting free advice. And I think that can be done without having to resort to calling anyone names, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know your industry so well....come on tell us who are regarded as the 'cowboys' and tell us who are the good ones....it happens in every industry, I know how good/bad my competitors are...so give your opinion on who are regarded as the cream and those who are regarded as being Mickey Mouse outfits ?

I agree and if you are so proud of the ethical way your company operates then plese dont be ashamed to tell us their name. Im sure its definately not based in Leeds anyway:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the members on here are wise enough to know whats right and whats wrong. The overwhelming majority of people who have had the misfortune to attempt to 'reason' with a DCA on the telephone have realised what sort of people they end up dealing with. People who are prepared to use every trick, deceit, bullying and downright lies to coerce someone into paying money off an ALLEGED debt wher 99 time out of 100 the greedy DCA cannot enforce it anyway.

 

The best advice is NEVER SPEAK TO A DCA ON THE PHONE. Keep a paper trail of every dealing with them by insisting that ALL contact is in writing.

 

 

'Alleged' is a good word ODC, I am referring to genuine debt. And by the way, 99/100 is a completely false figure, as I'm sure you well know. Every day, up and down the country, CCJ's are granted in favour of creditor's with a view to obtaining Charges and Attachment/Arrestment o Earnings.

 

I think the key point is, if an debt is disputed, by all means fight, or if a DCA is opperating outside of the law, then report it, record the calls and take it as far as you can.

 

But it completely devalues all destroys all this hard work when people who can, and should pay their debt seek to use legal (and sometimes not legal) loopholes to try to prevent them having to pay their debt.

 

The fact is, since the tightening up of financial legislation, and more and more cases of disputed debt, credit agreements will be retained by creditors, and if you have signed for it, you owe it. Failure to adequately communicate with creditors (phone or post) may lead to adverse credit and litigation - and by the way, this isn't what the creditors want, all they want is for you to make adequate provisions to pay your outstanding debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree and if you are so proud of the ethical way your company operates then plese dont be ashamed to tell us their name. Im sure its definately not based in Leeds anyway:lol:

 

Lol, we aren't based in Leeds, but I can't say who I work for for very obvious reasons! I'm not going to bleat on about this, I'm on this site for a couple of reasons I'm happy to admit, 1) Research - it is my chosen field, and I am also a complaint handler, so it's important to see what is happening across the debt portfolio and how customers are being treated.

2) To help - I'm more than happy to provide any advice I can, though I cannot be either company or individual specific or give any advice into which I am otherwise involved.

 

As a side note, there is no mention of the DCA I am employed by anywheer on this site, which I must admit is a relief!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All!

 

Back to the point of the Thread...

 

Now I see we're being Harassed on CAG as well as via the Telephone!

 

Hopefully a Mod will pull the plug on this Troll and clean up the nasty stain that's just appeared on my Computer Screen.

 

If I hear the words Debt, Pay what you Owe, Debt, Genuine Debt, Debt, Hard Working DCA, Debt, Sign for It so you Owe it, Debt, Debt Portfolio I will projectile barf...

 

There is a war on, and this Debtor is not taking any prisioners.

 

Rember the golden rule: if you see a good DCA, shoot it, quick, before it goes bad.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All!

 

Back to the point of the Thread...

 

Now I see we're being Harassed on CAG as well as via the Telephone!

 

Hopefully a Mod will pull the plug on this Troll and clean up the nasty stain that's just appeared on my Computer Screen.

 

If I hear the words Debt, Pay what you Owe, Debt, Genuine Debt, Debt, Hard Working DCA, Debt, Sign for It so you Owe it, Debt, Debt Portfolio I will projectile barf...

 

There is a war on, and this Debtor is not taking any prisioners.

 

Rember the golden rule: if you see a good DCA, shoot it, quick, before it goes bad.

 

Cheers,

BRW

 

 

u know the best one i have found is fall asleep on them and snore very loudly down he phone.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, we aren't based in Leeds, but I can't say who I work for for very obvious reasons! I'm not going to bleat on about this, I'm on this site for a couple of reasons I'm happy to admit, 1) Research - it is my chosen field, and I am also a complaint handler, so it's important to see what is happening across the debt portfolio and how customers are being treated.

2) To help - I'm more than happy to provide any advice I can, though I cannot be either company or individual specific or give any advice into which I am otherwise involved.

 

As a side note, there is no mention of the DCA I am employed by anywheer on this site, which I must admit is a relief!

 

 

u say that some DCAs dont act within the law. Well how about this one then.

 

last year about november time on one saturday morning at about 6.30 am i had a thumping on the door and a luton van reversing on to the land outside my property.

 

Looked out of my bedroom window to find out what the hell was going on and found a dca.

 

Demanded to know why they felt it was fine to disturb the whole neighbourhood at 6.30 am and was very rudly insalted.

 

this is how the convo went.

 

Idiot:- Mr ************ i am here to collect your property as you have not paid the debt to ********** that you owe. We have wrote to you but you have ignored us.

Me:- Mr ********** moved out in june of 2005 and my partner and l have lived here since August 2005 so please leave.

Idiot:- Would you please let us in so we can remove your property until you provide proof that you are the legal owners of the property and the legal owners of this property.

Me:- No l wont let u in and no u will not be removing any property from this property as you have no legal powers to do that as you have been informed the debtor does not live here.

Idiot:- Look Mr ******** if you dont open the door we will break it down.

Me:- Oh good my dogs need there breakfast have not been fed u see due to it being b4 8 am.

Idiot:- CAll the dog vans we may need a few as we will need to take dogs to.

Me:- If you dont get off my premises i will call the police.

Idiot:- Thats ok if u want to waste police time then feel free u have to understand the law is on my side.

Me:- ****** pass me my phone. quick call to police explaining i needed police assitance as a dca was trying to break in to my home for a debt that belongs to the previous tenant who have not lived here since june 2005 and threatening to remove my property and my dogs.

Asked tehm to leave whilest on the phone to police and they refused advising me i would get a bill from the police for wasting thee time.

10 minutes later pc plod a riot van and the inspector on duty turns up let in the PC and inspector giving them my details and proof of details and proof of tenancy.

The Pc then went and spoke to the idiot who gave him paperwork to check over with me regarding the previous tenents name etc.

I took down the details of the DCA and the police advised them to remove them selves of the property as they were happy the person who they are looking for was not the LADY that lives here.

DCA got in there vans, buy this time 2 DCA dog vans were on near the premises as well and left.

Police advised any more problem to call 999 and advise them what was going on again.

Wrote to DCA never got an aploogy or any type of comunication from them.

 

They got a bill from the council for digging up the posts on the grass out side the property so they could reverse the truck on to the grass this bill still needs paying.

 

needless to say they have not been back but the debt must have been sold on as i have recieved mail from other dcas for the guy.

 

 

Your comments please.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wanted an adult discussion, so answer the Godmother.

 

The DCA is Not on line ATM and in no rush for the answer.

 

I know they broke the law especially when they said they wanted to remove my property and the Dogs now that would have been funny.

 

Anyway connif how are u?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

both are soundo.

 

not long now it i hvae the next one just 4 long and boring weeks need to keep myself busy but dont have enough to cover 4 weeks of work.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your completely right Godmother- The bailiff has no powers whatsoever to enter your property forcefully unless you have already, previously, allowed them entry in order to catalogue your posessions for removal.

 

This could soon change however, with proposed legislation to increase baliffs powers.

 

Its unnacceptable that you haven't had at the very least an apology.

 

And to the contrary Banker, I'm certainly not harrasing anyone on here. If anyone has any genuine questions, feel free to ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello GodMother!

 

u know the best one i have found is fall asleep on them and snore very loudly down he phone.

 

I'll never get that chance because, when it comes to bankers and jolly old me, the Telephone was never invented.

 

I do, however, have a plastic box that makes a noise about 25 times a Day, and that deals with them for me. It records their snarly adenoidal whingeing voices staright onto Disc and then CD-ROM.

 

I do pity the poor Judge that will have to listen to them all!

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your completely right Godmother- The bailiff has no powers whatsoever to enter your property forcefully unless you have already, previously, allowed them entry in order to catalogue your posessions for removal.

 

.

Apparently according to the post it was a DCA who tried to enter the property to remove goods not baliffs. As we all know DCAs are nobodies. They have NO LEGAL POWER whatsoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Our entire credit system is built on the assumption that what is loaned will be repaid (with relevant margins for write-offs etc..), Hmmm... and if it couldn't be re-paid at the level that a creditor wanted, then that creditor regularly took the option to sell the debt off to a third party (whether legally or not), who having bought it for peanuts, then saw it as an opportunity to make a fast buck. :rolleyes:

 

Also, talk to the DCAs, do it in writing where necessary, but come up with a realistic payment plan for the debt. Don't just offer £1.00 if you know you can pay more than that, or because you heard on this forum that they'll accept it. If it's genuine hardship, and nothing can be paid, then seek some financial advice - Bankruptcy and IVA may be an option. :eek:

 

Oh puh-lease... :rolleyes:

 

 

In defence of what you're saying, not all DCAs I've been in contact with have been outright nasty. However, it remains a dirty industry.... which isn't helped by naff advice from people like you telling folk to consider bankruptcy or IVAs just so that you can get your money quicker.

 

You'll have a tough job arguing your point on these boards, but feel free to respond if you wish.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In defence of what you're saying, not all DCAs I've been in contact with have been outright nasty. However, it remains a dirty industry.... which isn't helped by naff advice from people like you telling folk to consider bankruptcy or IVAs just so that you can get your money quicker.

 

You'll have a tough job arguing your point on these boards, but feel free to respond if you wish.

 

:)

 

Actually, I never suggested IVA/Bankruptcy, I said they were an option. Particulary IVA's, which are an excellent tool for those heavily in debt, which was the reason why they were intoduced in the 1st place. DCA's do not generally benefit from people entering into an IVA/Bankruptcy, its far better for the debt to be paid in full via a payment arrangement - but I'm certainly not going to argue about it.

Edited by Deshaine
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...