Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you Bankfodder.  I used the term frustrated agreement purely based on my own research and what I found on the Govt's website, especially in relation to Covid.  My situation appeared to fit but if it doesn't, it doesn't. The length of time the actual works themselves will take is not written into the agreement but I was told 2 weeks, they are doing the interior ceiling and electrics too. I was prepared to accept the new date of 7th Dec until I was told I couldn't speak to their Director for two weeks and then found out that they haven't applied for building regulations yet, this is something else they are doing on my behalf.  As they can't order anything until they have the regs through I can't see how the roof is in the process of being made (which is what they keep claiming). I contacted the CAB as I wanted this wrapped up for the weekend and had two conflicting recommendations on this forum.  One to just let the credit card company handle things and others saying I must give more time.  I'm not complaining, am grateful for advice - just getting more and more confused as to what I can/can't do. If I can avoid it at all I would rather not go through another 6 weeks of this, waiting for them to prove that they can't manage the Dec.date.  By that stage it could well be feasible that the roof is in the manufacturing stage, where as at the moment it can't be, which would further complicate things. Based on all this and what the CAB said I sent the email below last night and received Homeview's response this morning. If it came to it that I retracted what I've said and allowed them to go ahead for 7th Dec. and they didn't manage that date, wouldn't it be the credit card company that would recover the deposit - not me?  BTW I raised a dispute with Capital One last night. Email.pdf
    • oh dear  i think you are in for a big shock   i doubt very much the loan is settled there will be £100's in unlawful fees i bet   we have numerous threads here about them in 2016 they were residing at   PO Box 1044 ipswich IP1 9YA   i would be sending them an SAR  don't ever ring them.   have you checked your deeds online recently? check they are on there. and has the loan ever been subject to legal action?   if not that would be a rare thing to us.   https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:3134625398&q=Skye Loans&oq=Skye Loans&gs_l=partner-generic.12...    
    • doesn't say will anything. read it properly and carefully.   only the owner of a debt can get one of the many fake/tame paperwork only solicitors to issue any proceedings and they would have to abide by the courts pre action protocol of 30  days letter first!   as it's owner...i can try and instruct my dog to sit, if it does is a totally different matter. if my neighbour, who doesn't own my dog, tries it, it would ignore them.   the bottom line is there is nothing anyone can do to you. gyms don't do court gym debts don't appear on credit files.   any DCA they might get to write to you ARE NOT BAILIFFS any a DCA has ZERO legal powers on any debt, no matter what it's type.   dx    
    • This letter arrived in the post today, please advise how to proceed. I know the forums say they won't action but am very worried about this
    • go save his bacon clint and put him right...   dx  
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Clarkson321 v NatWest - **WON**

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 5228 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Thank god someone else is going throught the same as me!

I am helping my (grown up) daughter claim about £1800 from Nat West for unfair fees etc. I am happy that we are claiming for the right things.

Have done the Moneyclaim forms on line and with only a day to spare received very very official looking stuff from Natwest's solicitors. Cobbets LLP in Manchester.

They say that "the particulars of claim set out no facts indicating what the claim is about , are incoherent and do nto disclose any legally recognisable claim aganst the Defendant". They ask us to remedy the above, which with the help of this site I will be doing this week. As you will know, there's very little room to lay out your claim in the online court forms, so I suppose we didnt do a very good job.

I am sooooo relieved to see that we probably wont have to pay their costs if we dont win.

Does anybody have experience on how things might go from here?



Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clarkson 321



Welcome to the NW Forum.


You seem to have done q well on your own, did you use the site to find out about moneyclaim or did you just know how to do this?


You are quite far ahead and the next stage is the tricksy bit, but above else do not panic! You will win and it won't go all the way to court.


Spend some time on this forum reading threads of people at a similiar stage or already won. A good one is MountainofDebt and rbrears. They have both recently won and NW took it to the wire but NOT court. They really don't want that cos they will lose.


Apart from that read all the FAQs really carefully, there are lots of hints and tips for filling in the online claim forms and loads of people who will offer support and guidance cos theyve been there themselves.


If you have a specific legal/advice question the moderators will answer it for you asap but there are only a few of them and 28000 of us, rising fast daily!


Keep us informed on this thread how you get on.


loads of luck



  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the MCOL without any help or advice - didnt know there was any help or advice until I heard about this site on Moneybox (Radio 4) last evening.

I've read through loads of posts and feel so positive now, was beginning to think we had bitten off more than we could chew!

Found some very helpful "words" from other people's correspondance, and also see that Nat west are big on intimidation - NICE!

Will keep you informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having received the scary looking letters from Cobbetts I am now trying to use the very good excel spreadsheets from the site to calculate the correct amount owed to my daughter by the bank. I know I should have done this before filing a money claim online, but I relied on my daughter's calculation - which was not a good idea ! But now we've started we better keep going and I want to get it right so that they havent got any "wriggle room".

Please could someone tell me if I can include the monthly account "charges" or are these legitimate fees the bank charge for running the account overdrawn?


Also, if having done the correct calculations, the amount isnt EXACTLY the same as on the claim what effect will this have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank can only charge you a service charge if they provide some sort of extra service. Some accounts, such as premium accounts, have this monthly service charge. They can't just charge you for going overdrawn, processing unpaid direct debits etc It sounds like they are siomply charging your daughter for being overdrawn and thats not fair and can be claimed back.



If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt say its an Advantage Gold anywhere - the fees seem to be either £20 or more recently £28. It occurs at the end of the month just under the interest that has been charged. The only reference is Charges.


If I add all of these "charges" onto the other charges for unpaid stuff then we will be over the amount I put on the online claim - what effect will this have do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading through loads of postings and am now not sure what to do.

My daughters account is often debited with £20 (or more recently £28) most months under the title "Bank Charges". One posting I read says that if these are charges for running the account with an overdraft then the bank CAN charge this fee. Another posting suggested that if the bank wasnt providing any additional services for the fee then it could be included in the claim for return charges?

Anyone want to offer an opinion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only fees which cannot be claimed are monthly fees for providing a specific service e.g. 'Advantage Gold' account - these charges would only be a few pounds a month and would be detailed as such.


Any other fees such as the ones you have mentioned can be claimed.

  • Confused 1

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help friends, panicking here!

We filed the mcol - and received a letter from the banks solicitors telling us that it was "incoherent". So I send one of the letters from the library and a spreadsheet detailing our claim to them recorded delivery.

I also received the Questionnaire from the court and send the cheque and form back to the court. Unfortunately I made the cheque out incorrectly and I've had it back and rewritten it now and posted it again today. (so they havent received it yet)

Just gone to the mcol site to see what it says against our claim - it says "Halted" against Status of Judgement.

Anyone know what this means?

Is it because the cheque had to be returned............ or ..soemthng more sinister?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say for definite, but if you had a letter from the solicitors saying the PoC were incoherent, then they may have notified the court of this.


What exactly did you put as your Particulars of Claim?

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I enclosed a spreadsheet of all of the charges plus this :





clarkson321 CLAIMANT (Edited for your security)









1. The Claimant has an account ********** with the Defendant which was opened on or around 1998. (Edited for your security)


2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.


3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.


4. The Claimant contends that:


a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.


b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.


5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:


a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £1944 and any interest charged thereon;


b) Court costs;


d) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.


I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true.






Date: 18th June 2006.



What do you think???


Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you fit that in if you did your Moneyclaim online?


It only allows 1080 characters on 24 lines.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry should have been clearer (too much red wine!)

I admit that the mcol was not very concise or clear - I hadnt discovered this website so the claim was probably as incoherent as they said.

My last posting was a copy of what I enclosed to the solicitors, with a letter to explain and the spreadsheet showing details of what we would like to claim.

I know that this is unorthodox and probably cocks up the whole system, but I have my fingers crossed.

Is this a hopeless case now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell us what you put originally on Moneyclaim? I am guessing this is the reason why Moneyclaim says halted.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a letter from the bank this morning, usual blurb about believing the charges are fair etc and offering £1000 (about half).

Could this be why its marked "halted"?


I assume the correct response is "NO DEAL"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read another posting - and its started me wondering if I should accept the £1000 as part payment and then tell them that I do not accept the conditions attached to the payment and that I will pursue them for the balance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am about to start composing the letter back to Cobbetts, anyone got any words of advice? They are only offering less than half of the claim - is it better to accept the half and say you'll continue to pursue them for the rest or should I just reject the offer and hold out for the cheque! (or see them in court) .

Nearly there!

It feels really good to have them offering me money - instead of paying out ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clarkson, I was wondering, what date did you file your original MCOL? I know you had already started this when you first posted here on 12th June, but just wondering how long before then it had been that you did your MCOL?


I filed mine on June 6th, and haven't heard a thing from Cobbetts, they've filed an acknowledgement of service but I haven't heard anything else! Just wanting to check your date with mine to see if they may have forgotten about me :( or if I have more time to wait before I get an offer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going to think I'm really vague. I do know that Natwest had until midnight on 12th June to file their defence, so i suppose I did mcol about 4 weeks before that............. just gone back to mcol website and it looks like 8th May.

Does that help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does help! Thanks! Sounds like I'm about 4 weeks behind you, so no need for me to be worried that I haven't heard anything!!! Cheers, J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks, need some reassurance I think.

We've had the letter from Cobbetts offering about half of the claim.

We said no in a letter which I posted on 26th June recorded delivery.

Try as I might, I cannot get Royal Mail to confirm its been delivered.

The Cobbetts letter said we had until the 30th to let them know if we rejected their offer or not. It said if they didnt hear they'd assume we accepted it.


On the advice of a very nice man at the court (on the phone) he advised me to copy thier letter and our reply to the court just in case Cobbetts forgot to mention it to them!


Has anyone come across this before? Do the solicitors have some kind of way of not accepting post so that the time runs out? (Am I completely paranoid now! YES!!).


The cheque for the allocation questionnaire has been cashed by the court.

Do I just wait to hear what the date will be for the court now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

we won we won we won we won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cheque received this morning in full settlement - even including some interest that wasnt on the mcol!

Thank you so much for all your help. everyone.

Donation on its way as soon as cheque cleared!

Link to post
Share on other sites



Fantastic news.


Please don't forget to complete our bank charges survey.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...