Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hippo v Egg


Micky the Hippo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Old cc account converted to a huge loan some years ago but it was a big old card that got flashed around a lot before that so SAR off and today got an odd form giving me three choices

 

list of transactions in seven days for £5

copies of statements for £2 each

DSIR (Datas Subject Information Request) for £10

 

That DSIR sure do sound like a SAR by another name to me, they returned my cheque for £10 too

 

Ah well £5 for the list of transactions it is

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have problems reclaiming Contractual Interest whose rate fluctuates periodically, and is unlikely to be shown on the transactions summary, but will be shown by DSIR which includes full monthly statements.

 

You can only reclaim Contractual Interest if it was physically debited to your account, so your end-of-month debit balance COULD have a bearing, e.g. if £700 unlawful charges had been taken from you in previous months, but your debit balance is only £200, then only the Contractual Interest accrued on £200 is eligible for reclaim. If your debit balance is £2,000 then Contractual Interest on the full £700 would be reclaimable.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank-you

 

I was put off by the 'we'll send you instructions on how to apply for DSIR

 

which I suppose I was supposed to be

 

right you are, I'll go for the DSIR

 

how do EGG respond to CI claims? I haven't paid any attention to Egg yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

CI no probs. Recent claimants who never reclaimed interest found they were refunded S.I. without asking.

 

Claimants who have lost the will to live after wrestling with other cards, come here to start a vanilla charges reclaim from Egg, and discover they have arrived in heaven. It has become very civilized, long may it last.

 

PPI and Default Notice removal are a thorny kettle of fish, but you would not expect a quick solution there.

 

Real life accounts in V-E Day thread.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ci no probs?

 

coooooooooool, fingers crossed it'll be tidy then, it'll certainly be old charges

 

do they play ball with delivering the lot, pre 6 years and all that?

 

thanks a lot for that local knowledge

 

DSIR thingy is in the recorded thingy right now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click SEARCH

ADVANCED SEARCH

set keyword to limitation

select Other Installations, Egg Forum only

 

Not sure about delivery of statements older than 6 years.

It appears fed_up_1 won, including pre-6year-limitation, with extra work. fed_up_1 will know details.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have just managed to claim back charges plus interest and it only took 4 weeks to a full offer! Egg are quick to respond to each letter (4 day turn round) so I suggest start your claim. i went for the list of all transactions although on reflection I should have done more research about CI. However, it is money that I never thought I would see again so I am really very pleased.

 

Good luck with your claim.

 

Yode

Yode

 

Yode v Egg - smashed after 4 weeks

Yode v NatWest battle to the end (mcols issued) waiting retaliation

 

 

Sign the petition to the Prime Minister here:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/bankcourts/

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks all, I must say you're friendly and relaxed on the Egg forum

 

when we say Egg pay CI no probs, we do mean Ci don;t we? not just reclaiming interest?

 

I'm doing CI on my big Barclays and Natwest claims, just served the summons this week

 

I closed the card a few years ago so I'll be going for old statements, I assume th elaw is no different for them so it's just a matter of dragging them out of them screaming and kicking?

 

I've just started on that for Natwest and Barclays and a right old palaver it is too, suffice to say I already have two fullsets of statements for B and NW

 

Someone at B today promised me that my 2000-1996 statements were going into the post tonight, there's general amused cynicism on the B thread concerned with old statements

 

ah well, the DSIR or whatever they call it went off today

 

got SARS out on citi and mbna too

 

busy busy

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope, just dashed it off and stuck it out there, I think my SAR has the one saying this is my registered address etc etc

 

they're going to ask for ID I take it?

 

whatever, got plenty on the go, this is why I kicked off the second round of claims; SARs good and early

 

thanks though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Micky,

 

By Contractual Interest I mean the debit interest ACTUALLY levied by Egg on your card, accrued on a £20 unlawful charge levied the previous month. This interest at say 1.85% per month, compounded monthly. If you had paid off all or most of your debit balance, then the C.I. levied and reclaimable will be less than £20 x 0.0185 for that month.

 

When charges and CI have been added together, then is added 8% per annum Statutory Interest on top, as compensation for your having been deprived of use of said capital for said period.

 

I am not aware of any recent tussles on CI or SI. Reclaims started April 2006, but after 7 months of trying practically not one claimant got even a charge refunded by Egg, let alone interest of any description. Them bad old days.....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew they'd be difficult, that's one hard eyed faceless operation, I've got them down for later, let some other poor shmoes pile their bodies against mbna's ramparts

 

your CI and my CI doesn't seem to be the same, what you're describing sounds like the credit card version of the complex bank claim which calculates the proportion of the interest resulting from charges

 

I appreciate CCs might be different but my bank claims have been done calculating the interest resulting from charges and then piling compound interest on top, calculated daily :eek:

 

the mindsai sheet

Link to post
Share on other sites

In banks and cards, debit interest is calculated every night,

then levied once at monthend, i.e. interest is compounded monthly.

 

HYPOTHETICALLY,

 

Mr X has an Egg Card with debit balance 25 pence.

He forgets to make monthly payment so on 01 JAN 2001 is hit by Late Payment Charge of £20. His debit balance is now £20.25.

 

On 01 FEB 2001 his statement arrives, and Mr X finds he has a debit balance of £20.65 including:

 

an unlawful charge of £20 and

an unlawful debit interest of 40 pence (accrued at 2% per month).

 

Shocked, Mr X instantly pays £20.65 cash into his Egg card, leaving balance zero. He then has no further activity on the card -- no more spending, no more debit interest.

 

72 months later, on 01 JAN 2007 Mr X reclaims unlawful charges and contractual interest. According to your computation formula,

 

what contractual interest is Mr X entitled to reclaim

(assuming Egg debit interest rate stayed at 2% per month throughout)?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's late for me

 

not my formula, it's the mindsai spreadsheet and I'm not touting myself as anything other than a newbie

 

but, I'd claim the £20, I'd claim the interest charged that was due to the £20 and I'd then apply compound interest on both the charge and the interest from the day it was charged, compounded daily

 

I think my oldest charge so far is a Natwest £20 from Aug 2000 that's attracted about £90ish in CI, plus the interest charged on that £20 by the bank plus CI on that interest

 

is that the right answer?

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if Mr X were using the mindsai sheet for compound contractual interest, he'd enter the monthly rate into one of the fields and the spreadsheet would than use that to calculate interest on a daily compounded basis

 

I can stick the sample figures into the sheet tonight if you want me to

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there some sort of problem here?

 

this isn't something I thought up on my own, it's routine stuff on the bank threads, albeit aggressive/might not stand up in court stuff, plenty have claimed it and been paid

 

granted things might be different on credit cards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read this yesterday on MSE from Martin MSE.

 

"I've heard today from a rely source (not had time to check it out - but this is someone in the know). That a precedent setting case was decided by the high court today on claiming 'compound interest' on bank charges.

 

This doesn't effect claiming statutory interest as the article states - and has limited baring. I will delete the following paragraph from the article:

 

"While the calculator is based on ‘statutory interest’, some people do suggest trying to claim ‘contractual interest’, i.e. the interest rate the bank charges you for lending, which compounds the interest over time (see how interest rates work article).

 

They argue that it applies as this agreement is reciprocal. It may be worth a shot, but you’re more likely to be awarded the statutory amount, hence the calculator and template letters all assume you’re claiming this."

 

How can a court decide a precedent case?

 

If you're wondering how there can be a precedent case and whether it impacts the whole of reclaiming - the answers no. The bank had already paid in full - the decision purely impacts the claiming of compound interest, not on the rights and wrongs as claiming as a whole"

 

Not sure this helps but thought it may be useful for info.

 

Yode

Yode

 

Yode v Egg - smashed after 4 weeks

Yode v NatWest battle to the end (mcols issued) waiting retaliation

 

 

Sign the petition to the Prime Minister here:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/bankcourts/

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

 

a couple of people have got a slap when proceeding to court to try and claim the CI alone effectively after being offered charged plus stat

 

it really relies on being paid off by the bank, my claim have CI at the unauthorised rate and then CI at the authorised rate and stat rate in the variance

 

seems to me that there's nothing to lose other than some time and perhaps something to gain

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know much more than me about CI, and I don't think I can be bothered claiming it now that they have offered me the full amount I asked for. I do see your point ablout something to gain tho....

 

Yode

Yode

 

Yode v Egg - smashed after 4 weeks

Yode v NatWest battle to the end (mcols issued) waiting retaliation

 

 

Sign the petition to the Prime Minister here:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/bankcourts/

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...