Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Strange parking charge notice?!?! help?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just received "parking charge notice" or "pcn" from security international group.

 

here is my sob story i went to meet a friend for lunch at a pub where he is the general manager in woking town centre and i parked behind but he couldnt find any parking permits so he wrote a note on a piece of paper saying i was dropping of cctv equipment (i wasn't it was just a good excuse) and i would be back in 30 mins he left his phone number on the piece of paper along with his business card with the pubs land line number on it.

 

20 mins later i return and one of his employees presented me with a ticket that had been put on the car, now the employee had run out to move the car as the parking guy was sat in his van wrighting the ticket but the guy ran up to the car slapped the ticket on and took a picture before the employee had chance to move it ( the van was also blocking my car from being moved).

 

i doubt this will effect anything just thought it might help.

 

i may not even need your help as my friend at the pub is going to get in touch with the land owner.

 

the ticket says.

 

date: 11-08-07 Time: from 13.38 to...........

Location:Albion House....................................................

Site Code: ....................................................................

Patrol Officer R Finn..........................................................

Vehicle: Renault............... VEHICLE REG.**** ***

 

and that is it all the other info is payment slip, instructions for payment, credit/debit card and a warning!!!

 

Any help would be great.

 

i Can scan this ticket onto here and also the note and business card if you think it will help.

 

thanks

james

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please actually read the link that I posted for you above. You don't need to argue this - they do. It's a civil penalty, nothing to do with any laws or legalities or authorities. Read the link provided. :)

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read it but i still don't know what to do?

 

can someone tell me how to get out of this and how this link relates to my problem?

 

i know it says all the loopholes but is there a template of something i can use to write to them in my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Providing the signs were clear and the person who gave the ticket was either the land owner or his agent then there was an offence.... a contract was entered into and broken, plain and simple.

 

However, they have to prove that you were the driver - not just the registered keeper of the vehicle. So if you get a letter through the post you could request they provide proof of the identity of the driver at the time of the incident and no further correspondence will be entered into until they do.

 

If they have CCTV in the area showing you entering\leaving the vehicle or if an agent took a photo of you.... then I am guessing you would be hard pressed to prove you were not the driver and would have to pay the fine.

 

Its up to you what you do.... if it were me and the signs were clear then I would probably just take it on the chin and pay up (providing the charges are not unreasonable), it could have been worse, they could have put a clamp on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no offence. An offence implies a criminal act. There is nothing illegal about breaking a contract. If you read around the threads on this forum about private parking (there are plenty) then your course shall become apparent. This is a self-help site, not an ABC, 123 of templated 'loopholes' - which, by the way, are not even loopholes, but proper applications of civil contract law.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

By offense I did not mean criminal act - I meant something for which you could be penalised - either under criminal or civil law, i.e. breaking a contractual agreement. Should have been clearer, sorry.

 

Of course if you are charged a disproportionate fine or clamping fee, or if the the agent if not acting on behalf of the landowner, or if there were no clear signs.... or if you were not the driver then fair enough - But what if everything was as it should be and you were the driver and knew what would happen - would you recommend disputing the fine then or paying it?

 

Also, if you disputed the fine, and the agent produced proof that you were in fact the driver at the time of the incident and there were clear signs stating the consquences of parking without a permit.... where would you stand if the matter was taken to a county court?

 

Not trying to take a moral high ground here.... I'm just curious if people are ever actually just in the wrong and should pay up!! I have had plenty of parking tickets in my time, so I am no fan of them either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if you disputed the fine, and the agent produced proof that you were in fact the driver at the time of the incident and there were clear signs stating the consquences of parking without a permit.... where would you stand if the matter was taken to a county court?

 

...then the owner of the land would be entitled to seek damages for any actual loss incurred as a result of the driver's actions, ie in a free car park, there was no actual loss to the land owner therefore the damages which can be awarded amount to nothing. Clear signs don't matter a jot if the charge for the breach represents a penalty charge and it would also have to be proven that the OP had the terms of the contract fully explained to him and that such terms were fully understood.

 

One would, however, assume that as the General Manager of the premises where the ticket was issued and with the authority to act on behalf of the landowner, the OP's friend should be able to instruct the parking company to cancel the ticket, particularly as he was prepared to issue a permit and state that the vehicle was making an essential delivery?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

By offense I did not mean criminal act - I meant something for which you could be penalised - either under criminal or civil law, i.e. breaking a contractual agreement. Should have been clearer, sorry.

 

That's fine, no problem :) - but again, you cannot be penalised for breaching a civil contract (if one even exists here - that's another problem they've got, as implied agreement is so hard to prove...). That's sort of what this whole site is about :D The owner of the car park would only be entitled to recover his actual losses, not an arbitrarily charged £70 here, £80 there, £120 somewhere else. And the process is the Small Claims Court, as the owner would be bringing a civil suit - as the Claimant, the burden of proof would be on the owner every step of the way.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,first timer on this site and am already finding it very useful ! I'm a victim of one of Eye Level Parkings letters threatening me me Bailliffs etc and have followed advice on here so far.Now the letter has come from CCS Collect debt recovery and it is rather worrying,can anyone advise me on my next course of action please ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make your own thread and im sure someone will be along very soon to help you out :) make usre to take a read of some other posts too.

HSBC Credit Card - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Received a blank form

Barclays Partner Finance - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Recieved nothing

GE Capital Bank - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Received signed true copy

Argos Card Services - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Received nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,first timer on this site and am already finding it very useful ! I'm a victim of one of Eye Level Parkings letters threatening me me Bailliffs etc and have followed advice on here so far.Now the letter has come from CCS Collect debt recovery and it is rather worrying,can anyone advise me on my next course of action please ?

 

Yes, your next course of action is very complicated so please pay attention;

 

Do nothing.

 

Would you like that repeting so that you can take notes this time?

 

Do not ring them, write to them, or answer their letters in any way. their threats are simply that and have no authority in law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok will follow advice,thank you.All I can add is that I wonder how many people must pay these kind of things out of sheer fright at the alleged escalating costs involved !! These companies seem to go to serious lengths to extract payment and the letters are quite official are'nt they.

Thanks again for help,I'll keep you posted !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...