Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Do the banks destroy the original T & C's?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The lovely lady from my bank advised me that my original terms and conditions form that I signed in March 1993 when opening my account,was destroyed years ago!

 

Is this normal procedure for banks?

Do you destroy original paperwork for insurance policies, for mortgage agreements also etc etc?

 

Please advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's 7, but don't know for sure.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we chuck out old leaflets so as to avoid breaching regulations by somebody accidently putting them out...

 

BUT surely there must be some record of the T & C's even if it is only electronic? How can they rely on them if they don't have them?

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks All,

 

Having asked the customer care officer FROM MY BRANCH to confirm in writing what she said verbally; She has responded by saying that the matter is now passed over to Leeds!

 

It is an interesting scenario hence why I ask is it normal practice for banks to destroy original paperwork / agreements?

 

I am wondering if I should during my claim through the courts have the lady in question (from the bank) summonsed to court :D . Not to mention the clerk who advised me over the counter my funds were sufficiant and happily paid me cash over the counter then several days later stung me!

 

My case has been interesting to date from a cancelled / non working cash point card to being overdrawn though advised by bank im in credit to t&c being destroyed and including refusal to state in writing what is said verbally on the phone...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer is no because they would have to remember every single solitary conversation they have with each customer. To be honest, i have had a few customers apologise to me and i could not remember what they were talking about. I think you have had inefficient service from the bank and incompetance.

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there's a misunderstanding here. In branch we do chuck stuff out once it is out of date but yes there simply MUST be a record somewhere. For Christs we refer to the T & C's in letters so, if we were to rely on them in court, we MUST have a copy somewhere if only on computer.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could we have found a way out of having to supply the T&C's in our court bundles?

 

If we write to the bank asking for the terms & conditions for the relevant date, and they don't supply them and later produce them in court, is there something we could do about it?

 

sorry if that's not clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact I requested the T & C'S and was advised over the phone they were destroyed and therefore can not have a copy and advised that the matter is now with head office via writing, suggests to me either a stalling practise or negligence on the part of the bank!

 

I am not detered and will simply tell the judge that I attempted to seek a copy from the bank and they admitted to its destruction and then on oath I recall the words "penalty fees" being quoted on the original document that I have misplaced. At least on oath I will be telling the truth!In fact the NAB does quote penalty charges in their 2004 trading statement!:p

 

Is anyone in posession of a terms and conditions agreement forms from the 1993 period?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I see where bwdski's going which is why the Draft Directions going out with the

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionnaires.html?highlight=new+strategy:

 

"a) Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon;"

 

which I presume for most of us will be the T&Cs.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

"a) Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon;"

 

 

which I presume for most of us will be the T&Cs.

 

 

Thank you.

Have put another request in to the bank for the Terms & Conditions in the LBA we sent on Friday (recived today)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - and if the bank doesnt produce a copy of the relevant T&Cs we should perhaps be saying in our POCs that we do not accept that the bank was entilted to charge these fees at all as we have not seen or been provided with any T&Cs which permit the levying of such charges. That will mean that the banks will have to produce the T&Cs to show that they were in fact provided for in the contract in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...