Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

signature looks dodgy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have had a copy of a credit agreement back from thames credit but other half's signature doesn't look like his at all. However mine does there again they have had my sig on letters before.

has this happened to anyone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's have been known to scan signatures from your correspondence with them and paste them on to a credit agreement. Usually the scanned signature has a slightly grainy grey outline to it.

 

It may also be worthwhile scanning the agreement in (removing all personal details first) as it may not be enforceable even it hasn't been forged.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my signature does look grainy while the one supposed to be other half's is very black. Wish I could send someone the 2 signatures.

 

I'ld be happy to scan for you. If you want, PM me and i'll give you my address, send me what's to be scanned and a SAE and i'll scan and return either prints or .jpg's on a c.d. (ROM). Original doc's sent back with SAE etc...

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are unhappy about the state of the signatures write and tell them that you are not convinced they have complied with the CCA request and invite them to b******r off or take you to court.

 

If they take the latter step they will have to produce the original documents to show the judge and if they can't - well would you be impressed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What absolutely appalling allegations. If anyone thinks a DCA forge documents go to the police. It is a MAJOR crime.

 

Would a DCA with a multi million £ turnover really do this for a measly debts? Obviously no. People signatures change over many years.

 

[edited]

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 posts unapproved.

 

Please refrain from name calling and other slagging matches, and that applies to everyone.

 

Ramese, for info, there are ongoing investigations into different "financial institutions" (which shall rename nameless for obious reasons at this point ;-)) where CAG has unveiled considerable evidence that this is exactly what has been done. Whether this is the case here or not, I can not say, but don't dismiss the possibility out of hand. You'd be surprised. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

"DCA's have been known to scan signatures from your correspondence with them and paste them on to a credit agreement"

 

Proof? Details of Court hearing? If a DCA has been KNOWN to do this, why isn't there some EVIDENCE?

 

Because it doesn't happen that's why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rameses

 

There are 'bad apples' in every group of society, as I'm sure you'll agree.

 

As an intrinsically honest person, I have to say that I partially agree with your position that debt evasion does not benefit society as whole.

 

Laws, however, must be obeyed - by us all.

 

As a former DCA (I'm guessing), your viewpoint has a place on this site - perhaps expressed more informatively than confrontationally.

 

HTH,

T.

"Weasel (n): any person or group that operates in that vast grey area between good ethical behaviour and the sort of activities that might send you to jail".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the so called CCA agreements that members have posted on here have so obviously been cobbled together that a blind man on a galloping horse couldnt fail to spot the inaccuracies. A five yr old child could do better

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm ...Why you didn't reply to my PM :confused:
I think you may find that due to the sensitivity of the information and the facthat the DCAs monitor this forum you will find that nothing will be disclosed re this matter until its in the public domain. Im sure the wait will be worth it

Link to post
Share on other sites

"DCA's have been known to scan signatures from your correspondence with them and paste them on to a credit agreement"

 

Proof? Details of Court hearing? If a DCA has been KNOWN to do this, why isn't there some EVIDENCE?

 

Because it doesn't happen that's why.

 

When my first loving and heartwarming letter arrived from a certain company a year ago, I obviously tried googling them, having never heard of them, what came up was a LOT of hits where people were talking about their CCA's being returned from this company with signatures that didnt remotely resemble their own, or, their signature had changed over the years, and their 3 or 4 year old agreements were arriving with their current up to date signature!.

 

It is due to this that I have created a new signature for any correspondance with debt collectors, similar but different (and proveably so given that my usual sig appears on bank cards (and my banks IT system) and other things) enough that any attempted forgery will be spotted immediately. The claims, and the amount of those claims I got made THAT much of an impression on me....

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because, as as site mod, I used to log in every day and have a full inbox (and mine is set at 100 messages), about 95 of which would be: "hi (if I was lucky that they should be that polite!), where do I find the letter wot I need to get my money back?" or of the same level.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Bookworm ,

 

I do understand, as I run a support channel on-line and it can get heavy going at times. That's the 'price' we pay for giving our time freely though, and I for one wouldn't have it any other way.

 

Kindest wishes,

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if they (some of them) tried forging signatures and documents. Wake up disbelievers! And when I phoned up one agency about my father they refused to discuss the account without his permission. This was later sorted out, but at the time they were still willing to take a payment from me though! Surely that is against the Data Protection Act? I could have said I want to pay it all. They would have had to have told me the total owed for that to be possible. If I phoned up and said what does Joe Bloggs owe they would quote the Data Protection Act. If you want to make a payment it's all too different!

What sort of world do you want your kids to grow up in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"DCA's have been known to scan signatures from your correspondence with them and paste them on to a credit agreement"

 

Proof? Details of Court hearing? If a DCA has been KNOWN to do this, why isn't there some EVIDENCE?

 

Because it doesn't happen that's why.

I have evidence, it does happen, and all on a loan I paid back 2 years ago.

I sent one signed letter to a DCA with a different signature on it and guess what the alledged agreement had on it?

The debt collecting industry is really quite appalling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...