Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Re: diamondcats v Abbey


diamondcats
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

I wonder if anyone could help me. I have filed a claim against my bank, Abby, and have just recieved a reply from the courts which I am confused about.

 

The letter states the following:

 

"Upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative wothout a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of recieving it."

 

(first of all what does this mean, what happens in each of the three options i.e. to have an application set aside, varied or stayed and how would you go about either of them?????)

 

The letter then continues as follows:

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

"This matter be listed on the 4th of July at 2:00pm to consider striking out the claim as disclosing no reasonable prospect of sucess in the light of the recent decision of Berwick -v- Lloyds TSB 15 May 2007."

 

My understanding is that the above case was dissmissed from court as the Judge, Judge Cooke from Birmingham, "took the view that the bank charges were legitimate fees for a package of services and not excessive penalty charges" (This Is Money, 2007) and was referring to charges of an overdraft.

 

My case is not claiming for fees incurred from an overdraft as I did not have one but from Direct Debits. All the charges I want to claim back are of approximately £2200 including interest all of which I was charged over a one year period. I was charged twelve times in one day at £35 per time as they just kept trying and trying repeatedly.

As a result I see my charges as extremely unfair penalties and would like to ask if I can appeal against the District Judge Besford for considering striking out my claim on the grounds of an unrelated claim?

 

Please answer as soon as you can as I have to reply to the court by tomorrow, my 7 days are over. I would have asked earlier but I have only just found your site :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

Just to say that I have now had things explained regarding the letter I recieved (must have been having a dizzy day). I simply have to go to court on the date set where the Judge will decide whether my case is worth pursuing. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which court is this?

 

I think you would be wise to do a bit more than just turn up at court and see what the judge decides. He has obviously misunderstood/not read the judgement on the Birmingham case.

 

You ought to have your own thread - you might get missed here at the tail end of a successful thread.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump for a mod!!

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bookworm - can you contact diamondcats - not responding to PMs

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bookworm - can you contact diamondcats - not responding to PMs

 

Steven

 

 

He/she will get notification by e-mail of the PMs sent, so can't do much more than that, all we can do is wait and hope he/she will log back on soon.

 

Thanks for finding this, Steven. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i ask what Bank this is at?

 

Abbey Bank (aka Abbey National), the case is at Hull

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you probably did.

 

Are you a Hull person too? If so, you need to respond to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/announcement.php?f=12&a=94 as soon as possible

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Steven

 

Thank you for your response. I will try to get you the details you have asked for (somehow) I dont have a scanner and my computer knowledge is a bit primitive :???: . Yes the court my case is being dealt with is in Hull.

 

:)

 

 

 

Thanks Bookworm - can you contact diamondcats - not responding to PMs

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Steven

 

Thank you for your response. I will try to get you the details you have asked for (somehow) I dont have a scanner and my computer knowledge is a bit primitive :???: . Yes the court my case is being dealt with is in Hull.

 

:)

 

DiamondCats, please do not send your info to Steven (no offence, Steven!), pls send it to:

 

 

Even if you can't scan the stuff straight away, I strongly recommend you e-mail them asap with your contact number as per this announcement:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/announcement.php?a=94 and take it from there.

.

.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No offence taken - I was trying to get DiamondCats' info there anyway. I'm happy to butt out now

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...