Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5795 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hiya MT,

I just labelled it as I thought would explain it best, I divided my sheet into 8 columns first one date, [2] statement no:, [3] reason for charge[ U/O MONTHLY CHARGES ETC;] [4]how many,[5] amount per item,[6] daily, [7] monthly ,[8] total amount, this is just the spreadsheet I used to calculate just the charges taken from myself betweeen the relevant dates.

 

DATE St No Reason for xx Amount Daily Monthly Total

16/3/01 13 U/O +Monthly charge 3 £5.00 =£15 + £25 = £40.00

17/3/01 14 daily charges 5 x £5.00=£25 +---- = £65.00

this is just for a general idea hope it helps you , junkimunki;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for the intrusion Masontak, I offer you my apology for intruding upon your site but I was wondering if Conalot could let me know what years he has T+C's for as I am trying to locate the T+C's for 2001,- 2005, inclusive and would be eternally grateful to anyone if they could supply me with these.

Court date AUG 21ST 2PM;) :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

Well finally, my N1 is in an envelope as we speak. Nothing short of a miracle really. Due to lots of generous advice I have managed to complete everything; without a hiccup too.

 

Now the fun really starts!

 

A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will add you to my buddy list and follow ur progress MT, Pm if you need any more info, might be able to help if not I know someone will have the answer for you, I also have a thread in this forum "Junkimunki Vs Yorkshire Bank plc", COME AND FIND ME IF YOU LIKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!;):p junkimunki xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update.

 

Rang Court this morning to see who to make the cheque payable to and was told that I only have to send 2 copies of my N1 (plus other bits) in, I didn't even have to ask. They will copy it and then send me a copy.

 

Maybe it just depends on the court whether you have to send 3.

 

A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone

 

Not been around for a while, but things are moving on slowly but surely.

I received Notice of Issue and the bank have until 26th to respond. I have also received an offer (albeit small) from J Sutcliffe and Co.

 

As I have already started Court proceedings, I just wanted to check that I send Letter 6 back to the solicitors with the cheque enclosed, either cut in 2 or cancelled written on.

 

Thanks for any help.

 

A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie.

 

I'm currently working on the rejection letter so I can get it posted off tomorrow.

 

In the part below:-

 

My claim is for £XXXX.XX as outlined in my Particulars of Claim, plus court costs of £120.00, and this claim, etc.

 

Alternatively, should you wish to settle my claim in full, then please forward the balance of the claim (£XXXX.XX), etc.

 

Do I just put in the charges amount plus the £20 SAR fee OR do I put both those amounts in and the interest, or do I omit the interest?

 

I do like to make things complicated, don't I?

 

Thanks,

 

A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either

My claim is for £XXXX.XX (charges + sar + interest)as outlined in my Particulars of Claim, plus court costs of £120.00, and this claim, etc.

or

My claim is for £XXXX.XX (charges + sar) as outlined in my Particulars of Claim, plus s69 8% interest of £XXX, plus court costs of £120.00, totallling £XXXX and this claim, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The Bank have until tomorrow to respond to my claim. Do I ring the court to see if they have or do I just wait to see if I get anything through the post from the court/bank?

 

Just wondering!

 

Thank you.

 

A. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I was just wondering that with my claim being stayed last year with everyone elses whether amounts can be changed to claims. Unbelievably, I haven't had any charges for a while!!! but in the last 6 days, YB have charged me a total of £75.00!!! Is this because I have a claim against them???? and

do I have to start a new claim for any charges I have received since my claim??

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there is likely to be appeals the possibility of the waiver being lifted before the appeals are heard is unlikely. Would love to be wrong on this but we must be realistic. The other point is that if the appeals wont be heard for some time then the Human Rights argument comes into play, the question is what is deemed as a reasonable period of time. May 22nd will hopefully shed some light on what to expect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...