Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

my employer is making changes to my contract without asking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

can anyone offer me some advice please.sorry but its a little long winded

 

i have worked for my employer for over 3.5 years and i have been working on a shift system which averages 42 hours per week over a 3 week cycle. my contract doesnt say that im contracted to 42 hours however i understand that as when i took the job i was told this is what i would work and i have worked it ever since this is am implied term of my contract. my first problem is this....

 

my employer out of the blue has decided that they now require me to work a 12 hour shift on a bank holiday(my contract states that where i would normally work on a day that falls on a public/bank holiday i may be required to work my normal shift which in this case would be 7.5 hours) and this would add more hours to my working week and overtime is clearly defined in my contract as NON contractual and agreed by mutual consent. however since i have been working under the terms of a 42 hour week and in addition my company has always until now worked on the principle that if a bank holiday required us to work we would work our normal working shifts and the company would supply additional workers to cover the extra shift, surely my employers need to discuss this with me first before imposing these changes?

 

my second problem is that my holiday is calculated on my average working hours, so in theory i get 168 hours per year based upon 42 hours per week( this is in my terms of employment as well) so for 3,5 years when i have taken a day off work as holiday my employer has paid me 8.4 hours for each day i have taken off which gives me my 4 weeks holiday irrespective of what shift i take off ie if its a 7 hour . 8 hour or 15 hour. anyway my employer has decided to change this and has told me that now if i take 4 shifts over what i call our long weekend as holiday i.e fri 15 hrs,sat 12 hrs,sun 12 hrs mon 8 hrs i would normally been paid 33 hours however my company now say that they are going to pay me the hours i would have worked ie for this weekend i would be paid 47 hrs which means i would only get around 10-13 day holiday per year based on this

 

surely again my employers must talk to me before just going ahead and changing things?

 

i have a grievance hearing about this on monday morning so any help would be great

 

 

thanks

 

 

 

 

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't state how many employers this change affects, changes to contracts have to be put to your union before there can be actioned against, 1st port of call would be to speak to your union rep, you will find also that the company can-not impliment any changes untill 90 days notice has been given in writing of such changes, this falls to 30 days dependent on the change. There is also a opt out clause to working more than 48 hours per week, have you signed this, again your union should be able to give more info on the matter, if you are not a member, this site might be able to give you some of the answers you seek, other than that, there are employment depts that deal with such matters, which again the addresses will be on this site.

 

Acas - Home

 

 

This site has assisted me many times over the years, even though i am a union member.

 

Hope all goes well and that the changes benefit you aswell as the company.

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is stated on your signed contract copy that you must have?

 

if it is not specific on these points, then more fool you for signing it before it was.:rolleyes:

 

however, there appears to be several things that have existed, in mutual agreement, for several months if not years between you and your employer. although not binding [unless written on your contract] they will go toward your favour.

 

this part about holiday could also be used in your favour too.

it must be a written record somewhere and is a clear way to calculate your hours of work retro wise.

 

those should provide you with enough bargaining power to with them to sort these issues out so both of you gain mutual benefit.

 

as the other gent says though...is there a union involved here or more than just you working for them?

 

dx100uk

 

rep county council 25yrs+

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shywazz & dx100uk

 

Thanks for replying, this issue only regarding my employer making us work overtime affects 3 people as i work in the security industry so it only affects the people who work at my place of work however the change regarding the way that holidays are paid affects the whoole company which is a national firm so probably affects 1000s

 

my contract contains an express term in the way that the company calculates the holiday but it doesnt say how it will be paid,only that i will be paid in the following pay run/month, it just says how the holiday will be calculated. the point is that if the company carry out this they will in effect onlybe allowing me between 10 - 13 days holiday per year , surely this isnt legal?

 

with regards to the working additional hours my contract clearly states that " if a public holiday falls on a day where you would normally be scheduled to work you will be required to work your normal shift for that day" it is my understanding that as i have been working the same shifts for over 3 years if say a public holiday falls on a monday for example and i would on that monday normally work a 7.5 hour shift then i should work a 7.5 hour shift as per my contract .As my regular hours are 42 per week (which i understand can be considered an implied term as it is not written in but has been the case for so long and was agreed on commencement of employment) if the public holiday is forced upon me as a 12 hour shift then it would increase my average hours and my contract states "overtime is non contractual and purely on a mutual agreed basis" so if i am forced to work extra hours surely this is overtime if it is abouve my regular agreed hours and therefore non contractual and i can refuse?

 

unfortunatley im not in a union, may be i should be but i have never needed to be in a union(until now maybe)

 

once again thanks for your replies

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant.

in terms of the holiday changes,

as several 1000's of people are involved, i would leave it to them to fight it, just make your intentions known - that when it is ratified on a national basis throughout the workforce, you will abide whatever decision they agree to en-mass.

until that time, you will stay as you are thank you. if they try and enforce it locally before a national agreement is reached, then start waving the victimisation flag, that should put them off.

 

i am really not sure on this bank holiday hours bit.

 

there appears nothing in the contract that you relate to that states they cannot do it, but equally, implied or mutually agreed hours have existed for many years.

 

i'm not going to stick my neck out and quote anything , but, i think you do have a point. what are they other three saying that work with you, are they happy with it?

 

get my drift...

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx100

 

thanks,

 

the others at my works are unhappy and have filed a grievance as well regarding the changes, however the company appears to not care as its took them over a month to get back to us with any sort of comment or written reply.

 

im meeting my employers tomorrow so i will let you know what they say

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

you indicate this is a nationwide company.

if you are saying that the nationwide company are the ones that are not playing ball ob this bh hours, then things could get diff.

if however, it is just the local company, i'e your boss and you have not contacted, say the md, i would indicate that you will do so, as well as you are aware none of the affected employees are happy either. say you are all going to write to the national md and inform him of what the local boss is doing.

 

as the other gent says, contact the hr dept nationwide. the more you get these people thinking you are not alone, the more they will doubt how easy it is going to be to enforce it.

 

keep us informed and dont be intimidated.

you have rights that must be met and the agreement should be a mutual decision.

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My company who has not made a profit for over 4 years, last year took on 3 directors and several staff from another company which has declared insolvency. This in itself is suspicious, as both companies had been talking about merging for up to a year previously!

I also believed that a person who had gone bankrupt could not hold a directorship of another company

 

Last month, the workers were called together and told that the Managers and Directors (From the bankrupted company) had bought out the existing comapny which was now re-named.

 

A couple of weeks ago, all workers were given new contracts to sign and were told that it would be illegal for them not to sign!

 

When I was asked to sign my new contract, I refused, saying that my existing contract was valid, and that I did not agree to the terms of the new contract, which took away most, if not all of my rights under the employment act as well as the human rights act.

 

One of the directors tried to force me to sign by saying that I had been illegally employed by my previous employers - strange, as I have been there for over 10 years without any problems.

I told him that if he continued to try to get me to sign a new contract by giving me false or misleading information (Which he had!) or used undue pressure or harassment, we would discuss this at a tribunal!

 

So far, nothing else has happened.

As it is the general consensus amongst most of the workers that the new idiots in charge will make this firm bankrupt shortly, we're just hanging in there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Get in Touch with acas (they are in the phone book )and on line you do not have to sign a new contract .(0 days notice is required to alter any employment contract.( you could sign it but add the words this contract was signed under duress )they cannot stop you doing this but make sure the director also signs and get a hard copy

the directors who were made bankrupt i believe cannot be directors of any company this can be checked by company house (it easier if you have names ) they are also on line .

as for illegally employed they would be breaking the law as when you take over a company you take on all there responsibility's including all employees work contracts

PLEASE contact acas there services are free

I believe what i have stated is correct but if any one know better please let me know I had 2 company's for 25 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

my old employer used to limit toilet breaks to 2.5 minutes lol

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...