Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what the latest data on school suspensions tells us about the UK education system and early intervention.View the full article
    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gigglemal vs Nationwide


gigglemal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi y'all

 

Well, isn't this exciting? Consumer power in action, power to the people !

 

right, heres my story so far, will try and add any new info (contact nos etc.) as I go..

 

Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter on Tue 24 Apr, decided to allow about 25 days before I called them to chase up. After approx 5 calls, being passed on etc I struck lucky with a nice lady called SADIE (see separate thread by myself giving detailed contact nos for DP team). Turns out they had 16,000 SAR on their in tray, but she agreed to run off an abstract of my charges overnight and post to me, with statements to follow

 

 

DATA PROTECTION TEAM (for SAR) - (01793) 583061 or 583062

 

I received said abstract of charges on Wed 23 May, so sent the prelim letter on 24th, with an offer to settle just for the amounts as charged, providing settlement was made within 14 calendar days.

 

At this stage, one account was over 10,000 and the other just under a grand, which isn't bad really I guess :-o

 

They received the letter on 25th, so I rung them (BRANCH SERVICE CENTRE TEAM 1 (my surname starts with C I guess?) - 01793 712480, 712468 or 712478 today to chase up.

 

The last number is apparently the managers (Sarah Jane Dollymore), so guess which I rung?

 

I don't believe in waiting, especially given what happened with my SAR. They claim not to have received my letter (AGAIN), but when I said it was a CAG template he admitted to knowing the format, and asked the amounts I was requesting. He offered to Email 'upstairs' to Customer Experience, as they are the ones who reply to the letters. He said they are allowed 28 days to reply, but when I pointed out as they had lost my letter, how could they count forward 28, he then said would be actioned today. However, they have a 5-10 day turnaround to reply to complaints. I then pointed out it's in their intersest to reply within my 14 calendar day timescale, not with an acknowledgement but an answer, as I would be adding interest to my schedule of charges - I thought I would pass on charges 'as is' in the hope of a quick settlement.

 

In the meantime, I'm waiting for all my statements and going to review all charges and the interest calcs, as it's a safe bet they're going to fire me off isn't it?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gigglemal!

...I don't believe in waiting,
'Fraid U have NO choice if U want to successfully Re-claim YOUR money!

 

 

...especially given what happened with my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). They claim not to have received my letter (AGAIN)...In the meantime, I'm waiting for all my statements and going to review all charges and the interest calcs, as it's a safe bet they're going to fire me off isn't it?
The timescale from the date that they receive your S.A.R. is 40 days.

If U have sent it by Recorded Delivery, U can easily prove when that was, if it becomes necessary.

It will be deemed to have been delivered TWO days after posting.

If U think that Nationwide may FAIL to comply, or actually do FAIL to comply, within 40 days, here are a selection of Template Letters for U to use...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

If/when U do receive your S.A.R. the following Thread will give U your next options...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/nationwide/70325-im-new-confused-please.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

Thanks for the reply, your help is gratefully appreciated (as is everyone's on this fab forum!) :D

 

As it seems Nationwide are dragging their heels responding to my prelim letter (I guess that's part of the game, as well as with them being over-run), I'm now chasing my statements in full to work out the possible interest I can add.

 

Rung the DP team again today - they told me my statements would take 'about a week' on 22 May - and they say will resend them, but they also admitted to 9apparently) not keeping recordings regarding progress, therefore being unable to confirm if my statements were in fact sent at all?

 

I'm also looking to prepare my LBA to send next Fri - which will be when their 14 days is up, but I'm unsure whether I will be able to add interest (contractual) to my schedule of charges after I've sent the LBA (in case I haven't received my statements)? I guess I will just add the same proviso, but also explain I cannot add the contractual interest because of their tardiness in replying.

 

The Non-compliance links you noted are very useful, thanks again! :cool:

 

I think my biggest concern here is timescale, I realise it's well worth waiting for but I've pressing situation financially away from this, and although would like to consider any refund as a bonus (not wanting to count chickens etc.), I may need to take alternative action in the short term. I know the timescale is set in stone, which will be send LBA next Fri (8th June), which would put us at raising a claim/MCOL 14 days hence, which would put us end of July for (hopeful) resolution. Well, will address my other issue directly & independently of this case, and with all the help I've got from CAG hopefully be cracking the bubbly end of July!

 

Cheers !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally received all my statements, beavering through spreadsheets as we speak.

 

However, been made aware of the possible alternative route of the Financial Ombudsman Service, seemingly a quicker option than using the court (no doubt until they get snowed under like the banks LOL)

 

Going to investigate this further, then will decide whether to issue a LBA on Monday or go through the FOS - may be cheeky and do both, at least can see what happens in the 14 days it will no doubt take Nationwide to respond to my LBA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gigglemal

 

I would personally strongly reccomend that you don't use MCOL.

 

File using an N1 instead.

 

You do not save any time using MCOL, the case will still progress at much the same pace.

 

The disadvantage of MCOL, is that it does not give you the space to put in all your pleadings and arguments, and you normally end up having to just send additional info after anyway. This has the inherent problems of things going missing, and mislaid.

Also, I do believe that the only cases that have had the most problems, or been struck out have normally been done through MCOL.

 

N1 all the way, and DO read up and research your particulars of claim from this site, from both the templates and those with experience.

 

As for time. You do need to be patient I'm afraid, if you rush, you WILL make mistakes, they are extremely vigilant about anyone doing so especially at the moment, and will trip you up. You will only make a mistake, and lose, and then you will have plenty of time after to kick yourself.

 

THIS IS GOING TO TAKE SEVERAL MONTHS. NO SHORTCUTS.

 

As for the FOS. I don't know much about it. I believe some people have had sucess, but it depends on the size and complexity of claim, and I don't think they would even entertain a claim with anything other than statutory interest.

 

Good luck

 

PS: The Patricia Pearl book is excellent, reccomend it, consider getting it before you progress (I make no money or benefit in any way by saying this by the way)

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I decided to explore the FOS option, but only after writing a letter to Nationwide (will copy & paste it on here) making some demands for replayment, one for costs 'as is' within 7 days & then costs for contractual interest if repayed within 14 days.

 

Working on rationale that now FOS are involved (even including the initial discussion & return of post for me signing their form, they've processed my complaint & contacted NW within 4 working days), NW may play ball rather than ass about going through courts.

 

Will keep you posted of progress

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...