Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There will be no issues with a course offer if the dates are as you say. The usual cut off is four months from the date of the offence. This is so as to give the driver the time to accept the offer and take the course before prosecution becomes "timed out" at six months.   However, if the NIPs really were the first to be issued and there are no issues with the address details then both have a cast iron defence to the speeding allegation. The first is dated 20 days after the alleged offence and the second 23 days after the alleged offence. The Road Traffic Offenders' Act makes it quite clear that if a NIP is not served within 14 days of the alleged offence then no prosecution can take place. But as I said, late first NIPs are very rare and both need to check all the details I have mentioned before they decline any out of court offers of a course or Fixed Penalty.    For information, courses are normally offered for speeds up to (Limit +10% + 9mph). Only one course of any type can be taken in three years (with the date of the offences being used to calculate that period) and courses are not offered in Scotland. However, if a driver is not offered a course for any reason when he would normally qualify (including late NIPs) he has no right of appeal to have one offered. If the matter goes to court the court has no power to order a course.
    • My grievance against my manager is on Wednesday at 12.00 noon. A union officer is representing me. The representative for my manager is a product manager. I was told today that she is the Daughter or a Step-Daughter of the manager. Is this a conflict of interest? Am I correct in saying that, because the manager is the subject, the hearing has to be carried out by a person higher than the manager such as a director? if so, the product manager is not entitled to carry out the hearing. I'm pretty certain that I read this in law books. My Brother is a licensed union chairman but has since left his previous employment.  He is certain that I am correct . Any help would be gratefully appreciated.   diecastdave
    • Ok cool many thanks!  Much appreciated...I will check everything out now and answer all those questions!
    • Sorry,  its regular outgoings of payments. It’s income related they’re on, not contribution based.  Mum and applicant were totally unaware of the rules in regards to deprivation of capital.   On income related ESA but claim housing benefit and council tax support.   He hasn’t came into a huge chunk of money. It’s been spent over a duration of four years. appointee’s livid, and worried that he’ll be homeless.  
    • Hi all           I spoke to the courts earlier today and they advised me that the points placed on my licence were removed in October 2019, and that a court date is set for November 26th. Guess what ??? I had not been given that info either. The courts were very helpful and explained to me that everything had been sent to my previous address (which I have not lived in or owned for 5 years) The car in question was registered in March 2016 and I have owned since new and has never been registered to my old address. I have proof of this down to the point of not taxing the car March 2017 as the car was zero tax I did not realise I still had to go online and tax it, the summons for that was sent to my current home address.  it is very strange that the police directed everything to my previous address. i then contacted the police on the number given by the courts and was told to forward proof I was out of country at time of offence for them to look at, the police officer was very understanding and quite helpful giving the information. I have to e mail her tomorrow and will give an update when I know more as this previous address thing is really confusing !!!  
  • Our picks

steven4064

Steven4064 v Goldfish *** WON ***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4047 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Sent SAR two weeks ago. Got a phone call from helpful lady saying they wanted proof of ID - at last a financial institution that seems to know what they are doing. Let's see if they can keep it up.

 

Sent certified copy of passport today.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

COuld you tell me which address you sent the SAR off to. I'm chacing them for charges my ex may have paid. The docs he has are from 2003 so not sure if the address is still the same.

 

Mnay thanks

Ellielou x


Halifax 1

WON - £1,355.49 21/07/06

MINT

WON - £273.81 14/09/06

First Direct

WON - £913.50 01/09/06

Capital One

WON - £130.13 03/11/06

Halifax 2

WON - £188.03 01/12/06

 

Kensington Mortgages ERC

MCOL for £6,204.39 Discontinued

Halifax Mortgage Admin fee

WON - £10.00

Direct Line Mortgage Redemption Fee

WON - £99.00

Halifax 3

MCOL for £109.01 reg 07/03/07

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/redemptionfees/

Please sign this petition x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ellielou

 

The address we used is

 

Goldfish

PO Box 3598

Glasgow

G68 9YG

 

After a week they phoned me (actually I wonder where they got mynumber from? Humm, anyway) and wanted proof of ID. I had to send them a certified copy of my passport - cost me £5 - but they are entitled to that under the Data Protection Act.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

  • Haha 1

Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

31 days in and I have receieved a letter saying they want me to pay £10 for the SAR. Now, I sent them a cheque (got the number) with my original request. If they are going to carry on like this, then we could fall out.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Steven, any joy yet with Goldfish?
Nope! It's now 38 days since I sent them the second cheque for £10 (they lost the first one) - I'll give them until Thursday - that will be 40 days from when they received the second cheue (Track and Trace says they recieved it on 23 June)

 

.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned Goldfish as 40 days is now up since I sent my second cheque.

 

You will never guess what!! They have lost that one too!!

 

They checked on Track and Trace and could see that my letter was receieved on 23 June - the man I spoke to is going down to the post room to find out what they did with it. I hope threir efficiency improves or there is going to be a serious falling out!


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Goldfish are a nightmare - I originally requested my SAR back in May - have made 10 calls sent 3 cheques and still nothing! Even sent an email to the CEO and it was never acknowledged!

 

Reported them to the Info commissioner and they are now going to write to them - so watch this space!

 

I just hope after all this fuss I actually have some charges - lol:p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday, finally, I got my statements after phoning them on Friday and them phining me back on Monday.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Steven - you're having a time with this lot aren't you. I hope you've lots of nice charges on there that you can claim back ;)

 

Best wishes


jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I've got the statements we're on my timetable not theirs. Charges are justr over £200 and interest almost doubles it. So, worth going for. Here is the preliminary letter

Goldfish

PO Box 3598

Glasgow

G68 9YG

 

Request for repayment of charges

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I have recently come to realise that the fees which were applied to my accounts in relation to late payments substantially exceed your costs in handling these events and amount to penalty charges, which are contrary to common law and to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

 

This letter constitutes a formal request for you to repay £x in late payment charges and listed in the attached schedule, plus interest of £y based on my bank’s authorised borrowing rate of 14.9% compounded, which is what it would have cost me to replace this money, making a total of £x+y.

 

This letter is not a complaint and so I do not expect it to be treated as such. Rather, I expect a positive response within 14 days accepting my request in principle. I believe that this is more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and large resources.

 

Yours faithfully,

Steven4064


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let my timescale slip a bit on this as I've been busy with other things. LBA in the post in the morning.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let my timescale slip a bit on this as I've been busy with other things. LBA in the post in the morning.

 

It's all too easy to let your timescales slip a bit Steven, I'm about to send a prelim to Capital Bank that should have been sent in October :rolleyes: Never mind, better late than never.

 

Please can I use your prelim above? I propose to tweak it a bit for my own use. TVM :)


'Fortune favours the brave.'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any advice given is purely on the basis of my own views and opinions and offered in good faith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven who do you propose to name on the court papers? Is it Morgan Stanley / Lloyds TSB or Goldfish? Reason I ask is i am in middle of claim and they are stating (Morgan stanley) saying it is not there fault? Would appreciate some details if possible

 

Thanks


All advice is based on my experiences. I am NOT qualified and as such cannot be held responsible for any mistakes. If in doubt...get professional help.

If you like what i have said then make me a star!!

Some helpful links

I have been successful in many cases..here are links to some

Housing Act and deposits: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?266260-Deposit-being-withheld.-Please-advise&highlight=

Against Natwest: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?278646-N-west-v-Mrsfoot-s-Son.-***WON_ALL-CHARGES-REFUNDED***&highlight=

Against Swift Advances: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?46576-Me-V-Swift&highlight=

Against B&Q: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?172878-Me-vs-B-amp-Q&highlight=

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mrsfoot

 

I am going to name Goldfish Bank Limited (T/A Goldfish) as that is the company name on the letters they have sent me. Registered office is 2 Hertsmere Road, London, E14 4AB, which I will use rather than the Glasgow address which I have been corresponding with so far.

 

I hope to file the claim Monday or Tuesday this week. I will post the PoC I use later, in case that's of interest to others.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just discovered they sent exactly 6 year's worth of statments in response to my SAR. That will not do. Sent a stiff letter asking for the rest. Court claim will have to wait a couple of weeks.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally received my statements after 6 months from Goldfish - they have requested that I write to Lloyds TSB though as apparently Morgan Stanley didn't own Goldfish when I held my account.

 

I am now at LBA stage with Lloyds and have only had a standard letter telling me about bank charge claims being on hold - not sure what that has to do with my credit card claim.

 

Am due to file at court next week - should I continue with my Lloyds details or go for Goldfish... I am V confused.

 

LS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should go with Goldfish as that is the company your contract is with. The fact that Goldfish is owned by LTSB is irrelevant - they are just the shareholders.

 

In you claim, name "Goldfish Bank Limited (T/A Goldfish)" and give their address as the registered office:

 

Hertsmere House

2 Hertsmere Road

London

E14 4AB

 

Keep us informed - do you have your own thread? If not, start one and we'll keep in contact as we go through the process roughly in parallel. (my claim is going to have to be postponed for a couple of weeks - see above).


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I receieved a reply to my second Subject Access Request on 8 January and there are more charges in 2000 and 2001. I am therefore sending a second LBA (to override te first). I have also revised the interest rate I am going to claim in restitution for Goldfish's unjust enrichment - 17.9%APR. I have also pre-empted a discussion on the Limitation Act 1980:

Goldfish

PO Box 3598

Glasgow

G68 9YG

 

Letter Before Action

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

I wrote to you on 11 August requesting repayment of £xxx in unlawful late payment charges. I also sent a letter before action for these amounts on 6 November 2007.

 

Having realised that your reply to my initial Subject Access Request under s7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 was incomplete, I sent a further request which you replied to on 9 January 2008.

 

Using this information, I calculate that between 4 February 2000 and 13 March 2005 you added unlawful charges to the above account totalling £xxxx and levied interest on those unlawful charges of £xxx. I am therefore requesting repayment of £xxxx. The charges and interest thereon are listed in the attached schedule.

 

If I don’t receive a positive response to this request within 14 days I will make a claim in the County Court without any further notice.

 

I am also requesting payment of interest of £xxx as of today’s date based on your credit interest rate of 17.9% APR compounded, as restitution for Goldfish’s unjust enrichment by making unlawful charges to my account, making a total of £xxx. The interest will continue to accrue at a rate of 0.0451%/day.

 

I realise that some of the charges I am reclaiming were levied before 21 January 2002, that is, longer ago than 6 years. Because this action is based on simple contract, s5 of the Limitations Act 1980 would be thought to apply and the action to be time-barred after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued – the cause of action being, in this case, the levying of the respective unlawful late payment charges.

 

However, I did not seek repayment of the charges at the time because I mistakenly believed them to be lawful and therefore paid them mistakenly. I have also recently discovered that Goldfish have systematically and deliberately concealed the true nature of the charges they have levied, facts that are relevant to my right of action.

 

I will therefore be claiming that s32 of the Limitation Act 1980 applies as the action is for the relief from the consequences of my mistake (s32(1)©) and that Goldfish have deliberately concealed facts relevant to my right of action (s32(1)(b)). The limitation period of 6 years thus begins from the point where I could reasonably have discovered my mistake and your concealment, namely the broadcast of the BBC’s Moneybox programme on 18 February 2006.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

steven4064


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, I did not seek repayment of the charges at the time because I believed mistakenly (BASED UPON YOUR OWN INFORMATION)for them to be lawful

would that not be easier based on their mis information steve just a thought to say they were mis leading you

patrickq1


http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by patrickq1 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks patrick

 

I will make a note to include that thought when I file my N1. (too late for the letter now). If I get a reply (none receieved to anything I've sent so far apart from DPA request) I expect it will say their charges are 'fair and transparent' or words to that effect which I will then use as an example of them concealing the true nature or their charges.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved an offer over the weekend to repay the difference between my claim and the £12 charge they have implemented. No need for me to tell you my response to that ;)

 

Also they say they "do not recognise the value of your interest credit request..." This is hardly surprising since I am claiming contractual interest as restitution for the fact they have had my money all this time.

 

I am sending this reply

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

Thank you for your letter of 22 January 2008.

 

In your letter you say there have been four £15 and eight £20 late fees applied since the account was opened. From the statements you have sent me there were one charge of £12, seven of £15 and eight of £20. These are listed in the schedule attached to my revised letter before action dated 21 January.

 

I note that you have offered to repay me the difference between the charges you list in your letter of 22 January as being levied against my account and the £12 charge you have now implemented.

 

I note that your letter effectively seeks to justify this charge on the grounds that it complies with OFT guidance. In that guidance, the OFT says:

 

As a practical measure, to help encourage a swift change in market practice, we are setting a simple monetary threshold for intervention by us on default charges. The threshold is £12. (paragraph 5.3, emphasis mine)

We regard the setting of the threshold as a provisional practical measure to move the market towards compliance. We should make it quite clear that we are not inviting the banks to align their charges at such a threshold figure. We are not proposing that default fees should be equivalent to the threshold, and a court will certainly not consider that a default fee is fair just because it is below the threshold. (paragraph 5.5, emphasis mine)

 

The threshold is not intended to be a permanent feature of our intervention in this market. We will consider further action if trends in the market suggest that this threshold approach is insufficient to bring about appropriate and early change in the market. (paragraph 5.6, emphasis mine)

 

It is also important to note that the threshold for action is a statement of our regulatory intent. We have no power to constrain private civil actions or to determine what a court should decide and other enforcers may apply for injunctions under the UTCCRs. (paragraph 5.7, emphasis mine)

 

It is quite clear from the above that Goldfish cannot claim the charge of £12 to be sanctioned by the OFT in any way.

 

I therefore accept you offer only as a partial settlement of my claim and intend to continue with a court action since the OFT guidelines say that the fairness of the charges should be determined by a court.

 

Should the action go to allocation, I will be seeking an order from the court for Goldfish to disclose the actual costs to them due to breaches of contract. Knowledge of the actual cost base will allow the court to determine if the charges levied are in excess of actual costs. The law on penalties in contracts is well established and this simple arithmetic comparison will settle the issue.

 

In your letter, you say that you do not recognise the value of the interest totalling £xxx I have claimed. I do not recognise it either. In my letter before action dated 21 January I have claimed £yyyy interest actually charged by Goldfish on the unlawful charges and £zzzz in restitution for Goldfish’s use of the money claimed to unjustly enrich itself. For this I claim the authority of Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited) (Respondents) v. Her Majesty's Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Appellants), House of Lords [2007] UKHL 34.

 

In my action in the county court I will also be claiming interest at a daily rate of 0.0451% from the data of my letter (21 January) until judgement or earlier settlement.

 

Since your letter seems to have crossed with my revised letter before action, as a gesture of goodwill, I will give you a further 7 days to reply before commencing court action.

 

 

I hope this clarifies my position and I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

me


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've given them longer than 7 days - not as a gesture of good will but because I haven't had time to fill in a N1. I'm awaynext week, it will have to wait until I get back.


Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive not heard a peep from goldfish since i faxed and posted my put up or shuttup letter two weeks ago ,all quiet on the western front lol

patrickq1


http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by patrickq1 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another fantastically informative thread from steven4064. I'd like to subscribe but, as per usual, have forgotten how - doh! - hence this post.


NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...