Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BB-V-Halifax PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have! Always worth pushing them along. I think 4 months is quite good going for them as they do say between 6 - 9 month.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment, I've asked the FOS to consider the issue of the invalid CCA which has been provided to me by them (although I note from what a few people on here have said about the FOS and these issues is that they have refused to rule on the legality of CCAs - although I've sent them a letter from the OFT in which it says that the FOS should consider this), there's the PPI issue (which is worth about £800), and also their failure to adhere to the OFT Debt Collection Guidance Note as they've continued to pester me for interest and the like despite this account being in dispute and up for consideration by a third party.

 

My only costs thus far as stamps and recorded deliveries and the like. If I don't get a satisfactory response from the FOS in terms of resolving this (i.e. in me getting my money back!) then I will be taking it to court and seeking any costs that arise out of that.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not aware of the FOS awarding costs - especially not paying for my time in preparing all the letters and the like. If you know otherwise, please let me know.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest, i dont know otherwise,i was just thinking that if the FOS ruled in your favour that the PPI was miss-sold would you have grounds to reclaim your costs via the courts? as you should never have been put to the trouble of reclaiming in the first place

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

reply from the FOS today. . .

they have returned all the documents i sent them and have sent the business details of my complaint to HBOS and asked them to deal with the matter, they should issue a final response on the matter within 8 weeks.

on reciept of the final response, if i feel they have not put things right or have not heard anything from them i am to return my documents to the FOS.

 

HBOS have had 2 years to sort things out, so lets see if the FOS can scare them into action.

 

the saga drags on. . .

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Keep at them BB,

 

They tried to fob me off ,I lost patience,contacted the FOS ,and it was resolved in months.

 

Once the FOS send you the acceptance form for the refund of the ppi,(which I have no doubt you will receive )if you haven,t already asked for the 8% on top,request it on the acceptance form,as they ask you if there is anything else you wish them to consider or add to your complaint,they in turn ,will then inform the Halifax that the 8% ,must be added.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the thread in the ppi section -Having trouble using the calculator.

There is a link on there which takes you to a calculator that works out the interest for you.I don,t know if it includes the 8% though.

Maggie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...