Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good evening folks, i have my hearing tomorrow at 3pm. I have never been to court for a civil matter, what is likely to happen  and what do i need to do?  I plan on going straight from work, i finish at 2pm, it will take about half an hour to get there, does that sound ok? I called the court late this afternoon, sadly i was too late in the day and the office was closed.  
    • This is kind of related but does anyone know since I have this ban from entering UAE because of my loan, can I visit Qatar? 
    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest Default Removel - No response to agreement request


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anybody was able to help me.

I sent a request for my original agreement from Natwest on the 24 April 2007 with a £1 fee.

I have heard nothing in response to this and it has now been 30 days.

I originally sent the request as I want to remove my default - am I right in thinking that as they have not replied in 14 days the agreement is now un-enforceable if this is the case does this mean that they cant carry on with supplying my information to the credit reference agencies?

If this is the case then what do I send them and how can I try to enforce that they remove the default?

Anyway help would greatly appreciated - kiri260180

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kiri, you ae probably better waiting for a couple of weeks more.

at the moment NW are in default by not providing you with your copy of the

executed agreement. As such they are not allowed to pursue you for the debt.

But on the 11/12th June they will have committed an offence and then they

will require a Court Order before they can restart proceedings against you.

Do not write to them reminding them of the CCA request.

 

After that time if they still have not supplied the correct peperwork you can

cease payment to them.

 

As they cannot provide the documents, you can demand that they remove

your default. point out to them that failure to comply with your request will

result in a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office and I am sure

that NW will appreciate that they will then face a criminal record and a fine

but just leave it at the threat of reporting them to the ICO, do not mention

the fine and the criminal record..

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is great I will hold on a for a bit longer then -I wasn't quite sure.

 

I dont actually owe them any money I did it to get the default removed as even though I had charges on my Credit Card it wasnt the reason why I got the default so I thought that would be a weak argument.

 

I will lie in wait and see what happens - and let everybody know the outcome.

 

Thank you, kiri

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah Kiri, that is a different matter.

As you have now paid off the amount, they are not obliged to observe your

CCA request.

By the sound of it, you still have an account with them? If that is the case

it will make it very difficult to get the default removed.

Why was the default registered if it wasn't for you missimg payments/not

paying the required amounts?

 

PS As you have incurred charges, you could send them an sar to find out how much they have charged. Since most of the charges are

unlawful, you could then reclaim them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default was put on my account after I did not pay for a couple of months but I paid the account off a couple of months ago.

 

The account is now closed.

 

Does this mean then that when the account is closed they can still process my data but they dont have to provide me with an original agreement?

 

I have already asked for my charges back but there were only a couple.

 

Thank you for your help, kiri

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have closed the account you have to approach the removal of the

default from a different angle. It will depend on the terms of your original contract, and those terms are often governed by the start date of your

account. Generally speaking, the more recently you opened your account,

the more comprehensive the terms and conditions relating to defaults etc.

 

However, most contracts do not have a condition that they can continue to

process your data after the account has closed. Nor can they claim that

they have a legitimate interest in doing so once you no longer have an account with them.

 

It still may take a bit of pressure before they finally relent though. Your

first letter should point out that in view of you only missing a couple of payments and nothing more thereafter, plus you paid off the amount pretty

quickly that you feel the default was a bit harsh in the first place. And now

that you have closed your account, they no longer have your permission to process your data.

Point out that you are determined to have the default removed. That you

are prepared to go to Court if necessary.

If they feel they can continue to process your data, ask them to provide the Act that legally allows them to do it.

 

[As you have already claimed back the charges, they may dig their heels

in for that reason too.]

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is absolutley brilliant - thank you so much!

 

I opened the account in 1999 so I think I might have a fair chance with the T&C's - hopefully

 

I will have a go and look around for any similar threads and I will let you know how I get on. I only had £72 worth of charges so it was not a huge amount - so maybe if I wear them down they may relent!

 

Fingers Crossed and thank you again for all your help at least I know in which direction to go down.

 

kiri260180

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...