Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Preparation Costs


sam78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I agreed a settlement with the Abbey for my claim (sam78 v abbey WON) and I've requested costs. Below is the details of the story so far.

 

"The judge has ordered a small claims hearing for June 13th at 10.30. I have emailed my contact at Abbey to advise them of this - i think they are trying to use scare tactics on me to back out - what do you think? The emails are detailed below.

 

"Just to update you, I sent a request to the courts for preparation costs for this case, a copy was also sent to yourselves, which also advised that the claim had been settled.

 

I have been allocated a hearing for this of 13th June at 10.30am - the details of which should be in the post to you from the courts.

 

I would be grateful if you could confirm that someone will be attending the hearing if you dispute my claim for preparation costs.

 

Many thanks"

 

"Dear Ms Holmes,

 

Thank you for your email notifying Abbey of your plans to pursue your legal claim (7ZP00154) to a court hearing despite the Settlement Agreement reached on 20 April 2007.

 

As stipulated in my settlement email dated 20 April 2007, settlement was agreed in "full and final satisfaction" of your legal claim against Abbey. For you to agree to that settlement and accept payment and then later attempt to pursue your claim in order to receive further costs, puts you in breach of the agreement made.

 

Please be advised that should you wish the pursue this course of action, we will indeed instruct counsel, attend the hearing of 13 June 2007 and will in fact seek a costs order against you in this matter. We will seek to rely on the email correspondence of 20 April 2007 as evidence of our agreement and its terms therein.

 

I hope this clarifies our position"

 

"Thank you for your reply. I have agreed a settlement for the claim with you, though I am now proceeding to claim for the costs of preparation - this does not breech any agreement previously made with you. My letter to you and the courts dated 3rd May details that settlement was agreed between both parties, though I am quite within my rights to request that the judge sees fit to award me costs as per Civil Procedure Rules 27.14 (2)(g)

 

(2) The court may not order a party to pay a sum to another party in respect of that other party's costs, fees and expenses, including those relating to an appeal, except – (g) such further costs as the court may assess by the summary procedure and order to be paid by a party who has behaved unreasonably.

 

I believe that the Abbey has behaved unreasonably in their approach to defending this claim, not least because I believe the Defendant had no intention of ever defending this claim at a hearing. A list of cases that were settled before a hearing was also enclosed - copies of which you should have also received.

 

The judge in this case obviously takes my claim for costs seriously enough to warrant a hearing."

The Abbey have since emailed back to say 'we will instruct counsel accordingly' - Has anyone any experience of this please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam78,

 

I'm not 100% sure on this but at least this will move your thread back to the top of the pile & perhaps Gary H or someone else 'in the know' will be along shortly. I'd be really surprised if they send anyone to the hearing though...people on here have claimed thousands & Abbey have never gone into the court room so what's a few hundred pounds preparation costs?!...like you say scare tactics to get you to back down I think.

 

Did you follow the instructions in the following link?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/85726-wasted-costs-order.html

 

Will watch this one with interest. Good luck.

 

Villafan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. The link is where I got the idea from so followed all the details and amended the letters. Let's hope the Abbey do a 'no show'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure they won't show - the link suggests you apply for it once Abbey have agreed to settle which is what's happened in your case. I'm sure someone will be along soon with a more in depth response.

 

If not just 'bump' your thread again.

 

VF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sam,

 

this isn't an in-depth response, more an opinion that this sounds like typical abbey bully tactics so I would call their bluff as per the link, which was posted by BF, so has to be 100% reliable

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I've not heard anything from the Abbey since the emails from my previous posts so I'll have to presume they will be appearing in court on Wednesday morning. I've got all my documents together and I even intend to take the copies along so the Judge gets an idea of the work I've put in and how much time has been spent using the photocopier! I'm also taking the email from Louise at the Abbey which states they have a separate ac**** with their lawyers 'for this type of claim'. Wish me luck & I'll post an update at some point on Wednesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Abbey knocked money off an agreement they made to me for preperation of bundle/administrtaion bundle and this was backed up in a letter with a breakdown of the amounts and what they were for. They did this because the realised they have not paid all the charges they owe me. so wothout changing their charges they tried to reduce that amount. We are going to court as soon as a date is arranged as the abbey have not paid all my charges and i applied for contractual interest. Therefore I will be making sure the judge knows about their breach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only had an email confirmation abou the money they were giving me but I'm going forward with prep costs as I know that they had no intentions at all of bringing the case to court. They have wasted mine, the courts and many other peoples time - if they paid up in the first place it would never have got this far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought as much. I've nothing to lose really. I'm looking forward to having a conclusion to this and hopefully I'll be able to set a precedent for others to go ahead and claim costs and not feel intimidated by the banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have now been to court. On my arrival I was told that the defendant had a barrister representing them, not that I was too bothered by that.

The barrister came over, introduced himself and gave me some photocopied pages from a text book about 'the effects of compromise' which I read whilst waiting to see the Judge.

We were eventually taken through to a room to see the Judge and he asked me tostate my case so I basically said that I believed the Abbey had behaved unreasonably by not dealing with my claim sooner rather than it having to go to court. The Judge asked the Barrister for the Abbey for their case which was that I had agreed a full settlement which had included costs for preparation time.

The Judge was very fair and stated that the Abbey were not unreasonable for not defending sooner and that it is not unreasonable for a defendant to enter a defence and then offerrng settlement before a hearing. Although the Judge also understands that the banks will settle before a hearing so that they avoid having to disclose details relating to their charges.

The Judge advised that as I had already had my offer increased to include preparation costs that I culd not request them again.

The Barrister for the Abbey requested that their costs were considered, which the Judge said was unreasonable.

The case was dismissed.

At least this has now been sorted fully.

My advice is that once you begin to reach a settlement that you request preparation costs at this point and incorporate them into your settlement figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...