Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

*1 won 1 awaiting judges order to throw out defence*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

yahhooooo

barclays have paid up the full amount on the account i am waiting to hear about (they had till the end of the month to reply to the courts if they were going to defend it) but have had a letter today offering the full about and them saying that they disagree with the charges but recognise that it is not cost effective for either parties to take this matter all the way to trial. therefore in order to avoid the inevitable time and cost associated with pursuing the claim to trial we are prepared to settle your claim upon payment of charges applied to your account together with statutory interest and any court costs which comes to £2147.68 subject to the terms set out in this letter.

then they go on to say the rest like we admit to no liability etc etc.

just wait for the judge to say pay the other one now.

Thank you everyone for your help and interest in (sos people comp wanted to shut down) this especially saintly 1 who has always been there with the answer and encouragement to keep going cheers mate your a STAR and also slick who also kept in touch and helped thank you

cheers

nic

ps will keep you upto date on other case also on here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

3577386743

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one, Nicethan.

 

Big Congrats to you.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update for everyone

B's have sent the cheque and have put it in my bank.

still waiting on my other claim but phoned up the court on tues and they said the judge will be getting my claim forms on weds and then inform me of what he is going to do next.

dealt with greg thomas regarding paying me from barclays and must say what a very nice bloke he was in dealing with this and said that when i hear from the court to phone him as i will get the details before him due to the amount of work they have got.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi everyone

quick one here received a letter dated 2 august from the courts that barclays had 7 days to respond or the case gets struck out then they had 14 days to pay.

got a letter today saying that they have instructed a different solicitor to defend simmons and simmonds dated 16 august.

what is going on anyone else had this?:

what sould i do now?

any advice would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicethan,

 

2nd August + 7 = Stike out time

 

Ask for case to go back to judge with your request that Barclays defence be Struck Out for non-compliance with his last Orders.

 

This is nothing to do with Barclays or their new solicitors.

 

JMHO, Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thhis is very good news and as slick says, it is entirely irrelevenat that Barclays are swapping sols midstream. I can only presume they have advised you of this hoping that it will be 'taken into consideration' if they apply for more time to submit. Yeah right :D

 

Fill in an N225 - if you need link http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n225_0406.pdf

and get it down to court asap. Personally I would hand deliver it first thing Monday morning.

 

You don't need to inform Barclays, they'll find out once they get the Order to pay up.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers guys

phoned greg thomas friday but been camping since

he said that they will proberly try and get it varied and the judge will get back to me but will do as you say they have had more than enougfh time now sick of there stalling tactics all the time i mean come on they just keep stalling this thing out.

wilol write a nice letter to the judge and enclose an n225 form as well as you advice welshcakes.

cheers

nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wrote this to ask for my case to be struck out was sending the other day but been so so busy.

 

To the court manager

I the claimant Mr****** wish to take this opportunity to request that my case against Barclays Bank has not been defended by themselves and that it should be struck out for non compliance to the courts judgement in this case.

My reasons for this is that I feel that the defendant is just stalling for more time by passing this case to another solicitor IE: (Simmons & Simmons) in this case rather than there own legal team who have had more than enough time and good will shown by the judge and the court in this matter and who have not responded before the deadline set out by yourselves and district judge tombs and I feel that this is wasting the courts valuable time and resources.

I refer to the last correspondence I received from yourselves dated 02 August 2007

Which stated that upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to this order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The defence be struck out

2. There will be judgement for the claimant in the sum of £**** plus the court fee of £*** payable by the defendant to the claimant within 14 days.

I received a letter from the defendants solicitors dated 16 August 2007 a full 14 days later.

Also on the 5 July 2007 the court also asked the defendant to produce a schedule setting out all claims of this type in England and Wales which have proceeded to a final contested hearing and the outcome of such hearings.

Which the defendant did not respond to and at the bottom of this letter that I received from yourselves it states that in the absence of any such objections being filed on time, the defence herein will be struck out and judgement entered for the amount claimed by the claimant, together with appropriate costs claimable on the small claims track.

What I am asking is, is that the defendant has had more than enough time to get there house in order on this matter and if it were myself against this multi national organisation and them asking me for monies which they thought were unlawful that I had made against them, is if I would be allowed such time and understanding by themselves and there solicitors?

So I am asking if this case can be struck out, so no more of the courts time be wasted up on this matter?

 

if amendment needed please forward your thoughts, all advice much appreciated cheers

nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

got a letter today from the county court and it basically says that my case has been stayed by the judge on his own inititive

goes on to say trhat my case has been stayed until the outconme of the commercial court case any listed hearings in this case are vacated and will not take place

either party may apply to the court to lift the stay any application to the court must be served on the other party and be supported by evidence why the case should proceed before the determination of the commercial court case.

this order having been made on the courts own inititave either party may apply to either vary or revoke it provided the application is made no later than 7 days after the order of the order (only got it today dated 21 august bit late there then arent i)

there are other things in the letter but mainly about the commercial case etc etc

HELP

Has anyone managed to get there case reopened unstayed yet?

whats my next move?

any help would be much appreciated

cheers

nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers smutly have put a thread on the new forum to add myself to the long list of who this is affecting wonder what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot with barclays and what there responce to my delaying tactics would be?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...