Jump to content


chubbas dad v reliance & fester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 632
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hello people.

 

bad news im afraid. :(

 

after a long period of reflextion and thought.i have decided the risks are to great.i therefore will not be continuing my claim at this time.i feel i do not have a good chance of staying in the small claim track,and if i am allocated to multi or fast track, i can not afford to loose and pay the costs.i would rather live to fight another day.and im sure ( hopes and prays ) it will come.

 

it is with a heavy heart that i have made this decision.but i feel it is right. :(

 

i would like to thank all the people who have helped me get this far.without your help and support it would not of been possible. :grin:

 

the alliance and leicester freedom fighter is down...but not out! :(

 

i will keep tabs, and if by any chance i can take up the fight again.i most definately will.

 

 

thank you all............................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chubba,

 

Is there a way to reduce your claim and keep it in the small claims court ?

 

If you are amending the POCs then an amendement to reduce the amount of charges must be perfectly reasonable.

 

That is a long fight you have had so far.

 

All the best anyway.

 

Regards - William.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a little something to get you all thinking.........

 

A little boy goes to his Dad and asks, 'What is Politics?'

 

Dad says, 'Well son, let Me try to explain it this way:

I am the head of the Family, so call me The Prime Minister.

Your mother is the Administrator of the money, so we call her the Government.

We are here to take care Of your needs, so we will call you the People.

The nanny, we will Consider her the Working Class.

And your baby brother, We will call him the Future.

 

Now think about that and See if it makes sense.' So the little boy goes Off to bed thinking about what Dad has said.

 

Later that night, he Hears his baby brother crying, so he gets up to check on him.

He finds that the baby Has severely soiled his nappy.

So the little boy goes To his parent's room and finds his mother asleep.

Not wanting to wake her, He goes to the nanny's room. Finding the door locked, he peeks in the keyhole and sees his father in bed with the nanny..

He gives up and goes back to bed.

The next morning, the Little boy say's to his father, 'Dad, I think I understand the concept of politics now. ' The father says, 'Good, son, tell me in your own words what you think politics is all About.'

 

The little boy replies, 'The Prime Minister is screwing the Working Class while the Government is sound asleep. The People are being ignored and The Future is in deep ****.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

chubbs been reading...........not sure if this is of any use to me (or you)?

 

passage from the defence submitted by a & l.

 

8) it is denied that the charges, or any one of them, are punitive in nature and / or a penalty. the charges were incurred as part of the banking services provided by the defendant and calculated in accordance with the defendants terms and conditions agreed to by the claimant.

 

12) in accordance with the defendants standard bank account terms and conditions agreed to by the claimant, the claimant agreed to pay charges levied by the defendant for banking services provided by the defendant in the course of the banking relationship.blah blah blah.

 

16) as to any allegation (if any) that these charges are penalty clauses, they are not.the charges are administrative fees levied by agreement in the cicumstances set out above blah blah blah.

 

19.2) the terms relate to the price or remuneration as against banking services supplied in exchange, as explained above and therefore constitute a "core" provision.blah blah blah.

 

i just dont know if this is what is needed.i still have a day or two before i discontinue officially. any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ashurst llp have just telephoned me. i was asked if i had entered my ammended poc to the court.

 

i replied "not as yet .......but i do have untill friday at 4pm to do it."

 

ahhhhhh was the reply.

 

i wonder what they are up to now ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...