Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

chubbas dad v reliance & fester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5130 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 632
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:( ok i have downloaded the "notice pursuant to s10 of data protection act 1998, and notice of intended data protection act complaint" letter do any of us think i should send it? and see what reaction it will provoke (if any) or is it a bad idea for me to bang on at a & l at this uncertain time with the current economic down turn...........................stop .............im sounding like my bosss grrr!!!! any ideas people?;)
Link to post
Share on other sites

robbed this from bank fodders thread.i rekon i mite have a go at this whilst im at it.any ideas which agency to send it to or shall i bung um all a copy?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

Notice that you hold data about me which is inaccurate and in dispute

 

My credit file shows that you are holding personal data about me which is inaccurate and which is in dispute.

The entries have been lodged by XXXBankXXX and refer to purported debts which are in fact comprised of unfair bank charges.

As you are aware, the entire issue of bank charges has been in dispute generally between the banks and their customers for well over 2 years. In July 2007 the OFT announced that in response to a request by 8 UK banks they would be bringing a test case on the issue of whether bank delinquency charges were subject to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999 (UTCCR).

 

It is clear that at least by that date, if not before that the

UK banks admitted that there was a serious question mark over the status of their charges.

 

In May 2008 the High Court ruled that the bank’s charges were indeed subject to the UTCCR. In February of this year the Court of Appeal unanimously concurred with the High Court.

I am sure that you are well aware that the OFT has publicly expressed its view that the charges are subject to the UTCCR and also that they are unfairly high.

Although the banks may bring a further appeal to the House of Lords, there is frankly little chance that they will succeed and there is every chance that the OFT will set a cap for charges which is very much less than the present level of £30 and more in many cases.

Once it is fully confirmed that UTCCR is the governing law and that its terms have been breached by the banks high level of charges, all charges which have been levied to date plus any associated interest will be unlawfully unfair. Any related entries on the Credit Register will automatically be in breach of the Data Protection Act and defamatory.

There is no provision in the UTCCR to allow the difference between unfair charge and capped rate to be invalidated. The whole charge becomes invalid per se.

 

 

Additionally, I am putting you on notice that I informed the bank that I disputed their charges on XXXDATEXX. Despite this they have proceeded to make entries onto my credit file in breach of the Banking Code of Practice, in breach of their contractual obligations and in breach of the Information Commissioner's own guidance on defaults issued in 2007.

 

I am putting you on notice that I intend to complain to the Information Commissioner’s office that you are holding inaccurate data about me. The negative entries on my credit file are damaging to me and the Data Protection Act allows me to seek compensation from both you and the organisation which communicated the data to you, through the County Courts and this is also an option which I am considering. The inaccurate entries about me are defamatory and that it is a new act of defamation each time you publish those entries to any enquirer. Even if an inaccurate data entry carries a dispute marker, it does not prevent the inaccurate data from having a damaging effect and it does not protect you from liability.

 

The Defaults Guidance notes issued to Credit Reference Agencies by the Information Commissioner in August 2007 make all of this very clear to you so that there is no doubt that you are aware of your responsibilities.

I expect also that you are aware that being an “innocent disseminator” is no defence either to claims under the Data Protection Act or in defamation.

I understand your procedures well enough to know that you will not immediately remove negative entries from my data file. Nevertheless I require you to do so and your failure to respond to this reasoned and polite warning will be brought to the notice of the Information Commissioner and the courts in due course.

I understand that you may make some inquiries from my bank before taking action but in the meantime I fully expect that you will place an entry on my file that the entry is disputed.

 

I would be very grateful if you will let me have your full response by return

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
:p right i have decided i qualify for a hardship case on the grounds that i have had more than £500 worth of bank charges in one year. i am now going to write to a & l and see how we go..................:grin:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck .

 

Refer to the waiver terms and make your letter individual ( as I know you can:))

 

they wil probably ask for an income and expenditure form on which they will base their decision.

 

Also if you have any priority bills or threatened court action then let them know .

 

Dont say you just want a new Bike:D

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jan, long time....... you know the rest..........i am thinking of bunging the bank this little pearl of chubbness any suggestions would be a treat..

 

xxxxxxxxx

xxxxx

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx

ba21 xxx

xxxxxxxx

 

21 april 2009

 

 

 

 

 

alliance & leicester plc

bridle road

bootle

merseyside

l30 4gb

 

 

 

 

 

dear sir/madam

Account number: 123456789000

 

 

I am writing to request that you repay all the default charges that have been applied to my account since 01 november 2002 , and stop adding any further charges to my account. I do not believe these charges reflect the true cost to alliance & leicester of going into unauthorised overdraft.

 

I request that you deal with my case now rather than once the test case has ended, as I am currently experiencing financial difficulties due to having over £500 (five hundred pounds) worth of charges applied to my account during the past year,forcing me to continually exceed my overdraught, and incurring further charges. the FSA waiver states that you should continue to deal with hardship cases.

 

My current circumstances mean that I am paid on a friday (weekly) the charges are applied for the previouse breech of overdraught,i then shop for my family of five, and this then causes me to exceed the overdraught yet again incurring a £25 charge and a daily charge of £5 untill the limit is reached, or money is paid in to my account.i have no meens of catching up, and so the cycle goes on. i am now in a position where i am struggling to pay my day to day household bills.ie rent, concil tax, water,electric, and gas.

 

i also would like to inform you that i intend to issue a notice pursuant to s.10 of the data protection act, and notice of data protection act complaint, with refrence to a recent default notice you applied to my account. attatched.i am also informing you, that, i am putting the credit refrence agency that you use on notice that information you supplied them and which they currently use is incorrect

 

The charges total £loadsa plus as I believe I have been unlawfully deprived of the money I have calculated £wonga interest at the statutory rate, the amount a court would award.

as at the date 07 august 2007 in relation to claim number xxxxxxxx which was stayed at my local court by the honourable district judge nice bloke.

 

I therefore ask that you repay me the full amount of £ mega, including the court costs £120 totalling £buks and all charges applied to my account since the stay was applied,you have recieved a full schedule of the charges and interest for the above claim.and i respectfully request a fully comprehensive list of all the default charges, for direct debit, unauthorised overdrafts and standing orders I have paid since 01 nov 2002 to date. 21 april 2009 .If you are unable to provide this data, I will accept a copy of my statements; I understand that statements on their own are not covered by the Data Protection Act 1998, yet I’m not requesting the statements per se, but a comprehensive list of the charges to which i am entitled by law.

 

 

I look forward to your full response to this letter within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx

 

wowser!!!! wat a corker? or is it not so good as the chubbs thinks? :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jan, long time....... you know the rest..........i am thinking of bunging the bank this little pearl of chubbness any suggestions would be a treat..

 

xxxxxxxxx

xxxxx

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx

ba21 xxx

xxxxxxxx

 

21 april 2009

 

 

 

 

 

alliance & leicester plc

bridle road

bootle

merseyside

l30 4gb

 

 

 

 

 

dear sir/madam

Account number: 123456789000

 

 

I Refer you to the most recent terms of the waiver in the respect of bank charge claims and would like to identify myself as a financial hardship case under these revised terms.

I am currently experiencing financial difficulties due to having over £500 (five hundred pounds) worth of charges applied to my account during the past year,forcing me to continually exceed my overdraft, and incurring further charges.I am sure you are aware the FSA waiver states that you should continue to deal with hardship cases.

 

My current circumstances mean that I am paid on a Friday (weekly) the charges are applied for the previous breach of overdraft which leaves me with inadequate funds to feed my my family of five, and this then causes me to exceed the overdraft yet again incurring a £25 charge and a daily charge of £5 until the limit is reached, or money is paid in to my account.I am now in a position where I am struggling to pay my day to day household bills.ie rent, council tax, water,electric, and gas.

 

I also would like to inform you that i intend to issue a notice pursuant to s.10 of the data protection act, and notice of data protection act complaint, with reference to a recent default notice you applied to my account. I am also informing you, that, i am putting the credit reference agency that you use on notice that information you supplied them and which they currently use is incorrect

 

 

My total claim at todays date totals £ ( spreadsheet attached)

 

 

I would appreciate your early reply to my letter.

 

Yours faithfully,

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a suggestion - have you considered getting control of your own money back and open an on line basic account without OD facility - then prioritise your funds and ask A&L to freeze your account and just pay them back the OD as and when you can afford it? Or ask them to freeze it as in dispute as there is a charges claim pending?

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard mention -Nat West solo/Co-op I will check for others

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

morning all.

 

 

i have recieved a response from a & l .

 

dear mr chubbs

 

thank you for your recent enquiry and we acknowledge receipt of your request for repayment of fees for your claim of financial hardship.

 

so that we may fully investigate and consider your claim,please complete the enclosed income and expenditure form and return it to us in the pre paid envelope within the next ten days.we will then refer your details to a specialast team to consider your financial situation.

 

please make sure the form is completed fully and provide copies (please do not send originals) of three months proof of earnings or other income.when we have considered your claim, for security and confidentiality reasons, the documents you send to us will be destroyed.

 

if we do not receive this information we will assume you no longer wish to claim financial hardship and will be unable to consider your request for a refund of fees on that basis.we will also be unable to progress your request untill the outcome of the test court case is known.

 

in line with other current account providers, the financial services industry has asked the finacial services authority (fsa) to suspend the normal timetable for dealing with complaints in relation to fees for unauthorised overdrafts.the fsa has agreed to this request.

 

although we do not know how long the case will take,we can assure you that once legal proceedings have been completed we will resolve your complaint as soon as possible.if , at that stage you do not agree with our conclusions you will be able to refer your case to the financial ombudsman service or to the courts

 

you can find more information on the test case by contacting

 

the financial sevices authority- Financial Services Authority

the office of fair trading- The Office of Fair Trading: making markets work well for consumers

the financial ombudsman service Financial Ombudsman Service

 

we appologise for the inconvenience that this has caused and we can assure you,once the test case has reached its conclusion we will advise you of the outcome.

 

it then goes on with a section about how to avoid paying fees.

 

they make no mention about my notice of data protection act complaint.or any mention of my request to have a fully comprehensive list of all the default charges, for direct debit, unauthorised overdrafts and standing orders I have paid since 01 nov 2002 to date. 21 April 2009 .maybe a nudge will be appropriate when i return the expenditure forms.

 

is this a standard letter they send to hardship case claims that are stayed?.i have filled out the expenditure form and it makes great reading, my bills alone total £16491 and my income is only £11856.i never realised things were that bad lmao.(robbing peter to pay paul has become the norm for me).although i have no debts, apart from rent, council tax, water, elec, gas, food shopping,petrol,car tax,tv licence,car ins,home ins,all the normal day to day living expenses with five kids (three living at home) and a girlfriend lol :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes sounds like a standard letter to me - they are good at that.

 

Now dont get your hopes up too much as the terms of the waiver does not say that the banks must refund charges - but only that they should consider hardship cases and help where they can.

 

However on the other site I post on we are still getting successes and it varies from Bank to bank as to what % people are receiving.

 

its horrible when you actually write it all down and have to face up to reality - especially as a lot of bills just keep going up and up.

 

Best of luck

  • Haha 1

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Jansus says, this is a standard letter from A&L. They use all the usual delaying tactics we've come to expect from the Banks. All I can say, is keep plugging away and get that parachute account opened asap

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) thanks awfully chaps. choks away.

 

i have filled out the forms and am checking them over at my leisure tonight.may get them in the post tomorrow.i will keep you informed of the chubbs progress. shall i stipulate a time period for a response from them.i think i ought to as it seems to get them going.

 

 

 

 

:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...