Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yea but the annoying this is that they're not based in england so they won't even come. Just a 2mo delay for no apparent reason.
    • Hi dx, thanks. Yes actually, that is the case with this one! I've taken tomorrow off work, I need to review the whole binder for each of these and I'll refrain from further questions until I do just that. Just on hold for court ref Claim #2
    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

chubbas dad v reliance & fester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 632
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Link to post
Share on other sites

HHHHmmmm i think you should forget about loving a banker:D All us luvverly ladies might get jelous!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

how do peeps.i been hiding for a long time, working and saving for the kidz holls in the summer.havnt seen much happening on cag or on the news, anybody know where we are at with the test case?or is it still a case of sit tight and wait.:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya chubbs, hope u r okay, not heard the results from the test case yet but i sent a little nudge letter to wraggies, hopefully someone who knows whats going on will post soon xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

yawn at work,

yawn at budget,

yawn !!!!!

 

 

 

how stoopid,fags up!! booze up!! fuel up!! tax up!!! LABOUR OUT!!

 

i dont smoke, or drink, and now i wont be able to drive,so that meens my dream of a new honda fireblade has gone...thanks darling...............:roll:

 

 

MONSTER RAVING LOONEYS IN...................the free bmx will come in handy at xmas coz i wont be able to afford anything for the kids.......:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

And what realy gets my goat is them saying it is to stop binge drinking!

 

 

Thi is the government who gave us 24 hour drinking!

Stop treating the public like they are stupid! We all know its an easy tax. Those that are guzzling cider in great volumes because its cheaper than water are not going to take the slightest bit of notice and neither are the very rich.

 

But for hard working and pensioners all these extras are going to hurt what ever small treats they get.

 

Petrol is a nightmare as well for small businesses and why should we be paying so much when other countries are not.

 

Rant over !

 

Personally I think the government are driving us to drink and then making more tax out of it.!

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This is what today means.

 

The judgment out today basically had three points to decide:

 

 

1. If the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations of 1999 could be applied to the terms relating to bank charges for overdrafts in personal current accounts.

 

2. If such terms were written in plain and intelligible language

 

3. If the law of penalties applies to overdraft charges in personal current accounts.

 

 

 

The High court held:

 

 

1. In favour of the OFT - yes the UTCCR 1999 do apply

 

2. Mainly in favour of the banks although some in favour of OFT

 

3. The law of penalties does not apply to overdraft charges because the charges are not payable on a breach of contract.

 

 

This is a massive victory on the part of the consumer. This means that the High Court have ruled that the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations do apply to overdraft charges which the banks have always denied.

 

 

This was simply the first round which may be subject to an appeal. Once the first round is finalised their may be further litigation to decide if the charges are unfair or there may be a compromise agreement between the OFT and the banks. But it is an important first step in getting a final decision.

 

 

 

 

What this means for you:

 

 

 

If your claim is currently stayed - the stay will remain in place until at least May 22nd when a decision will be made on any applications for appeal. The even if there are no appeals the stays may remain in place after this time until the second issue is resolved.

 

 

 

 

If you have not yet put in a claim but have written your preliminary letter do continue to make a claim so that you can claim your interest. If you wait until the outcome of the final decision it is unlikely that you will be able to file a claim as assuming the court rules in the consumer's favour the banks are likely to pay out on receiving complaint without waiting for you to file a court claim. In which case you will lose out on the valuable interest.

 

 

If you have not done anything yet then you can start the process by doing a Subject Access Request as detailed in the step by step instructions and then totalling up your charges using the spreadsheets and send off your preliminary letter demanding money and following the normal process.

 

Claims which are not affected by this decision:

 

CREDIT CARD

MORTGAGE CLAIMS

CLAIMS ON LOAN ACCOUNTS

 

Claims which are affected:

 

All personal bank accounts

 

The ruling on penalties will have serious implications on business claims. It is not currently advisble to claim on a business account.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

:p hi yah jen

 

 

brill news, just need it speeded up a bit,as when i went to court the judge said it would be unfair under human rights law to make me wait for a longer period than is necessary,hmmmmmm!!!! i mite look into that angle a little further?:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

ok just cheked some posts;) and i mite have a ponder about the "fairness with the lengh of time taken by the oft"............there must be something in human rights law that can push it along.because my judge smith used it to stay my case saying it wouldnt be fait "to make me wait longer than nescassary under h r l":-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

:D erk!!!!!!!!!!!! i know nothing......it wasnt me .................i was at home in bed sleeping and i have 300 witnesses.:rolleyes:

 

hi lancs, sorry i aint been about. unfottunately i know as much as you!!

 

 

why have a & l changed my t & cs?.........what is the minimum payment to a premier account?............have they realised they are gonna loose and are trying the re-coup route now?

 

 

whats going on?.................where is my jen?...................why cant i have a fireblade?...............i need an oracle.:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm here xx still in the dark too tho hun, a&l are appealing with the rst of em but we should here more middle of this month...hopefully, missed u lol x

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) missed u 2 u crazy cagger..........:p glad to hear u r ok gonna get me a new avatar..........maybe some gallows just for "darling and brown". lmao sounds like a funeral directors :rolleyes: maybe they will need one soon ?
Link to post
Share on other sites

haha, definately, they've stopped answering my emails lol, not that i'm stalking them at wragge and co....honest x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...