Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jasovercharged V Lloyds Tsb


jasovercharged.
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6130 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello to all fellow claimers,

This is my first thread. as i was redirected by hagenuk to the Lloyds forum.

 

So far I have used the templates from moneysavingexpert.com and received the usual response letters from Lloyds Tsb.

I am now at the stage where i have issued my claim with money claim online 13/05/07 for £4499.79 and am awaiting Lloyds response, which they have until 02/06/07 to do so.

 

It is at this point that nerves and self doubt are creeping in.

If anyone has any tips or advice as to what I should expect or need from here on in, I would be releived to receive them

 

regards,

jasoverchargedl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & Welcome!:)

Lloyds have 14 days from the date the claim was served (it is served 5 days after you filed it) to acknowledge the claim, and then 28 days from the date it was served to enter a defence. You will then receive a copy of their defence and you may receive an Allocation Questionnaire to fill in. These links will help you to fill it in if you get one:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/57708-draft-order-allocation-questionnaires.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

If you don't get an AQ, read this:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80091-your-court-dispensing-allocation.html?highlight=dispensed+AQ

 

Good luck, let us know how you get on, and if you have any questions, just ask.

Barty:)

  • Haha 1

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

sorry for the slow update but i have been layed up for a couple of weeks with a back injury so here goes

 

After sending S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) , prelim approach for payment, LBA and getting the usual response letters from lloyds i filed my claim as follows

 

15/05/07 filed claim with MCOL

01/06/07 received £750 full and final offer letter (dated 25-05-07)

checked my account and the£750 had been credited already!

01/06/07 checked MCOL, acknowledgement of service filed by lloyds

03/06/07 sent lloyds thanks but no thanks to offer but will accept as part payment of total claim as per template letter

05/06/07 received letter from northampton courts with aknowledgement of service intending to defend all of this claim.

08/06/07 checked MCOL and it now states defence dated 14/05/07 where it formerly had acknowledgement dated 01/06/07

is this normal procedure ?

does anyone know what my next step should be ?

I have printed off the basic court bundle, OFT statement and the early day motion, is there anything else which is needed ?

any and all information would be gratefully received as like many who are going through this process the nerves are starting to kick in and certainly the self doubt

regards to all

jasovercharged (overstressed a well)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

LATEST UPDATE

Today i received a notice of transfer from northampton county court to warrington county court. the transfer letter states that the AQ has been dispensed with and also included a ten point defence from lloyds.

point ten stating that the defendant paid me the princely sum of £750 as a gesture of good will, but not stating that i had written to them saying i would accept ONLY as part payment of the full amount being claimed.

I have read a few threads which suggest that the first nine points might be Lloyds standard defence.

 

does anyone know what my next step should be ?

Do i need to let the court know that i wrote to Lloyds refusing the full and final offer of £750 ?

Or is it now about waiting for the court date ?

 

All replies gratefully received

 

JAS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

latest update 04-07-07

Today i received a 'GENERAL FORM OF JUDGEMENT OR ORDER' letter from Warrington County Court, this is how it goes

 

Before District Judge Smart sitting at warrington courts etc

 

Upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of it's own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiveing it

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. The claiment shall, by 4:00 on 31/07/07 file and serve a breakdown schedule of the sums claimed. In default the claim shall be struck out.

 

2. The defendant shall, by 4:00 on 31/08/07 (provided that the claiment has complied with (1) above), file and serve an amende defence specifically dealing with sums claimed. in default the defence shall be struck out and judgement may be entered with fixed costs and intrest.

 

dated 26/06/07

 

Has anyone received this kind of letter before ?

 

The original statements from lloyds were set out as below

 

03-09-2001 chg o/draft usage fee £20 DR

12-09-2001 fee account usage fee £20DR

 

should i re-do my bank charge calculations spreadsheet to include the descriptions which lloyds used?

Would this be acceptable to the courts?

Do i just send this to the courts or do i have to send it to SC&M as well?

 

For anyone who is or has taken the banks on, does the panic and sick feeling in your stomach ever abate when dealing with the courts or is it just mine?

 

Regards to al

jasovercharged :eek: l

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Looks like you need to send a copy of your schedule to both the Court and the Solicitors (I think??)

Not so sure on the second bit, help anyone :confused: :confused:

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the spreadsheets here and make sure you include the details as to why the charge was applied. Send a copy to both the court and to SC &M.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

 

The second part relates to giving the defendant the chance to respond to the new schedule.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...