Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Financial - HELP!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all :p

 

I beleive I have unique case here against Lowell but can I get them to do the right thing about it? can I heck. No sooner have they put things right they are back again making the same demands.

 

My husband and I got a credit some years ago. We was paying it off bit by bit anyway it got to the stage where we were sick of the sight of it. So I called Lowells who were dealing the debt and I said look you want the debt to go away we do too. Lets make a deal. and we came to an agreement of £500 for each of them paid that day and the debt was gone.

 

This was all November last year. Lo and behold come January of this year. Lowell filed a bad debt against us both saying we owed them money for a credit card debt. I argued the case and said check the records I think you will find the debt was paid in full as agreed by yourselves. They did and agreed it was. I said so how come your company have filed bad debt against me and my husband for something that was agreed and paid full and demanded they remove it from our credit histories. Several arguments and a managment dealing later. They agreed to rectify the record but only to show the debt was paid even tho they filed this after the debt was paid they argued saying it will stay on our credit history for the next 6 years. I told them they could not file something after it was paid and agreed in full. They argued they could. Anyway they finally filed onto our credit history settled.

 

But guess what, they have recently re added them to our history all over again and stating the same balances outstanding. :x

 

And not only have they done this, Barclays have done this too for a closed account that was paid off in full in june last year and account closed. But because I have sent them a letter requesting repayment of unlawful bank charges they have filed a bank account against me that was closed!!!:o

 

My top and bottom of this is.

 

A) What can I do about this?

B) Is there anything I can sue them for?

 

Can anyone help???

 

All help appreciated. Thank you and sorry for it being so long. :D

Ladidi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ladidi,

 

I believe that some DCA's and CC companies will mark your record as partially satisfied when you agree f &f. They should have explained this to you when you were negotiating with them. This would not affect the date that the default was registered though and should be the same as before. It will stay on your record for 6 years unless you challenge it. Have you gone through the motions of checking the account for charges, true agreement etc?

 

I would ask for a copy of your agreement (£1 fee) to check whether they have a right to record anything at all under the terms & conditions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gerryb2

 

I`m sorry but I`m not quite sure I understand what you mean!

My understanding of law is that if the debt is paid off in full and was never on your credit history to begin with and debt recovery firm buy it and you pay off a balance that is agreed then that is the end of the matter there and then, from point of agreement and full and final settlement figure.

They cannot come back and state debt is outstanding or even register something that is paid off after the fact.

Yes I agree some of the money that was paid was charges which is what I intend to reclaim. But as Lowells and Barclays have filed things onto my account after the fact they have damaged my credit history and made it harder for me to obtain a lower mortgage deal.

If you cant go back and sue a company or insurer once a deal is set then debt companies should not be allowed to come back and file bad debts once they have been paid in full and agreed. Especially more so if the debt was never on the credit history in the first place

 

Ladidi

Ladidi

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry if I misread original post. I thought that a default had already been registered before Lowell bought the debt. However, Lowells seem to think they are a law unto themselves with regards your information. They will maintain that they were entitled to provide info to CRA's as payment by you was an admission that debt existed.

 

I would still ask for copy of agreement as without this you don't know what you have agreed to. Others more knowledgable than me may have additional advice - they'll be along soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gerryb2.

 

I am at the end of my tether with them. everytime I get it straigtened out they seem to come right back at me a couple months later.

 

I am also most positive if it was not registered in the first palce and debt is paid in full and no longer exists they cannot and should not be allowed to register something after the fact.

 

They certainly should not be allowed to come after you for something that was paid in full!

 

I feel I should be able to turn the tables and demand punitive damages from them and an appology for their incompetence.

 

Ladidi

Ladidi

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion you need to do as Gerry says and get a copy of the Credit Agreement first. You must send it Special Delivery - 1st class and signed for is great but Special Delivery is easier to trace. Send a £1 postal order - never give them your signature or any other bank details. You need to give them 12 working days, plus 2 days for post, then they are in default if they cannot supply the agreement. If in a further 30 days/calender month they fail to produce this, they have committed a criminal act - nice bargaining tool!

 

Then you should send an SAR request and a £10 postal order to Barclays Bank. This should show what has been going on.

 

Did you get confirmation that the F & F settlement was paid, in writing? If not you may of wasted your money.

 

Once you have all of the documents in your possession, you are in a greater position to know what has occured and when. Then you can plan your course of action.

 

Hope that helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if they do send you an agreement, post it here to get it checked for compliance. They have a habit of sending out copies of application forms and pretending that this complies with CCA request.

 

The best move you have made so far is contacting CAG. Don't rush things and do what Vampyra suggests.

 

Keep your thread updated and many will help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to both of you.

 

When I paid the ammount due I paid using my bank card dets and this will show on my bank statement so if they argued in a court of law I will argue and say that as all calls are recorded I have their voice on that same call stating they accept that payment not only with their first member of staff but also with the member of staff who also agreed that they are taking a full and final settlement.

 

I will not pay them any more money and if they threaten me I will insist they carry this out and the same to their lawyers. My telephone bill statement will also show the day dates and time I have called the company on various times on the day of agreed ammount and after this arguing and my credit history also shows the record of when they updated and readded and closed and satified and readded the same account.

 

I think in the court of law they will not have a leg to stand on. I also think that it is diabolical that they think and feel they can do these things and get away with it.

 

NOT WITH THIS LADY THEY WONT!!

Ladidi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladidi,

This may be of interest, although the letters are to a bank the same principles apply.

 

Remove Default Notices on a Credit File - We show you how

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello rory32,

 

Many thanks for that information I have just read it with great interest and intend to use it against Barclays as I had a loan with them and I did not receive any of the information they mention with repsect to it showing on my credit files so I am going to try and get it removed.

I have paid the debt in full and they kept assuring me that even though the debt was paid it would not make much difference and it turns out it does very greatly. So I am going to hold off remortgaging for another 3 to 6 months and see if I can get them removed to obtain a better interest rate deal.

 

My first letter will be in the post come tomorrow morning.

 

Many Thanks

 

Ladidi

Ladidi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to be of help Ladidi........good luck.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...