Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That's a bog standard dates only reference. You're over thinking it.   If that is the real company name and job title please edit to remove them.
    • Just asking for a bit of quick advice. I would think getting some money knocked off for buying a product that doesn't do what it says on the tin seems quite reasonable to me. I'm not bothered about only 4G but (asides from the reservations I have about the safety of 5G - and that's coming from someone who spent 5 years working in Microwave Engineering) I did see "5G Ready" on the page I bought it and though "Hmmm.. no harm in having a 5G enabled tablet". I thought this is what I was getting, and I only realised after contacting Apple to confirm the device was also 4G enabled that it wasn't actually 5G enabled. I'm sure a lot of folk who buy it there will think the same, and some might not be too happy to find out it isn't.   If you look further into the specs there is another page listing all three iPad devices they sell and the information there is correct, but on the face of it (if someone didn't investigate fully) it would appear that they are selling this item as a 5G enabled tablet.   I also don't really see why this thread was moved because it's entirely relevant to the sub-forum I posted it in, and it's a consumer issue. Whatever..
    • Firstly, thank you to all who took the time to reply, we have followed your advice and come to a settlement with my daughter's employers, however, there is one issue which I would like your thoughts on.    To follow is the proposed reference.    as a Booking Coordinator from 1 October 2018 until 27 September 2021. It is the Company’s policy to provide references which only set out an individual’s dates of employment. This information should not be taken to imply any comment (either positive or negative) about an individual or their suitability for future employment with a new employer. This reference is intended solely for the use of the addressee and should only be used for the purpose for which it was requested and generally treated in accordance with data protection principles.     This reference is given in good faith and to the best of my knowledge is true and accurate. However, neither I, nor the Company, accept any responsibility for any loss or damage caused to the addressee or any third party as a consequence of any reliance upon the matters set out in this letter.   To me the line above is a  polite character assassination by implying my daughter's future employer may suffer losses or damages. Your thoughts please. 
    • Thanks DX that looks perfect, here is what I have so far, I'm not sure about the first point which I have highlighted, while I did receive something from them it certainly did not fulfil all the requirements, do I need to give dates in point 5? if I do should the first date be the date I received the claim or the date I sent off the CPR & CCA requests?   Defence   The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.   1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC. 2.Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had in the past a contractual relationship with Sainsbury's Bank.The claimant has failed to state any agreement/account reference number within its particulars therefore I am unable to admit or deny the alleged debt claimed.   3.Paragraph 2 is noted but not admitted.The claimant has failed to state the actual agreement/account reference number.   4.Paragraph 3 is denied as I am unaware of any legal assignment.   5.On receipt of this claim on the ??/08/2021 I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request and CCA1974 Section 77 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. Mortimer Clarke is yet to respond in relation to the CPR 31.14 request. To date, 21/09/2021, no documentation has been received.The claimant remains in default of my section 77 request.   It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:   (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and   (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974   (c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and   (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;   7.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.   8.On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.   9.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Template Letter


jscouser2002
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im looking for a template letter saying that i will accept "x" amount but i am stilll going to pursue for the rest? Anyone got one that i can have and edit around please? Maybe one they have used for there own case.

 

Thanks alot very grateful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sort Code: XXXXXX

Account Number: XXXXXXXX

 

8th June 2006

 

Dear Mr Beaumont,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 5 June 2006 offering me £525.00 of my total claim of £619.00. Unfortunately I am not willing to accept this sum and I am continuing to claim for the full amount.

 

Furthermore, you have applied a further £50.00 unlawfully to my account on 8th June 2006 which means as stated in my previous letter I will be revising my claim, increasing the total amount to £669.00.

 

As a courtesy, I am willing to extend my deadline by a further 10 days before issuing my claim to the County Court. If you do not comply fully within 10 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

As I have stated in my previous letter, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

Would this be good enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had to edit your post - you DON'T want to post your account details to the forum!!! :eek::eek::eek:

 

My suggestions - delete the bits in red and add the bits in green:

Sort Code: XXXXXX

Account Number: XXXXXXXX

 

8th June 2006

 

Dear Mr Beaumont,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 5 June 2006 offering me £525.00 in part settlement to my of my total claim of £619.00. Unfortunately I am not willing to accept this sum and therefore I am continuing to claim for the full amount.

 

Furthermore, you have applied a further £50.00 unlawfully to my account on 8th June 2006 which means as stated in my previous letter I will be revising my claim, increasing the total amount to £669.00.

 

As a courtesy, I am willing to extend my deadline by a further 10 7 days before issuing my claim to the County Court. If you do not comply fully within 10 7 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

As I have stated in my previous letter, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

 

Yours sincerely

Apart from the minor edits, it's fine. Good luck. :)

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...