Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay so potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CF1958 v Lloyds Tsb


cf1958
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Caro has advised me to start a new thread on Lloyds Tsb as I am dealing with 2 seperate banks.

 

Claiming back bank charges for my sons partner, thay have really treated her badly over the years, some months they have taken £250 out in charges, which is more than 2 weeks salary for her, I would like to put her figures in front of Judge Cooke and let him say these are for a service.

 

Apart from the charges, for the past 6 years she has also been paying for a Select account which was £7.00 per month,which she has never requested.

I am trying to claim them back at the moment, a recent reply from Lloyds said she was transferred to this account in April 2001 when a personal loan was granted (this would be the loan conditional of PPI costing over £700) which i am also hoping to follow up.

 

I downloaded her statements from July 2002 from the website, however still waiting for other statements, S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) up on 26th May.

 

I am now thinking of trying to go back past the 6 years on her charges, as it is probably why she took the loan out in the first place, through the banktaking 50% of her salary in charges on a regular basis.

 

I would appreciate any information from anyone else who has also been upgraded to the select account, and has tried to claim the fees back.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cf1958

 

You could try going to your local branch and ask for the CUSTOMER NOTES on the account, this might indicate when and why she was upgraded.

 

Just go up to the infomation desk and ask them to print out the notes made on the account from when it was opened.

 

I did, they ran from Oct 1995 to the present day, the young lady didn't even ask why I wanted them just asked for I.D. and account number.

 

What's the worse they can do??

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nic

 

I ment for the sons partner to go to the bank an ask

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going through some internet statements and noticed the charge for UNAUTHORISED OVERDRAFT FEE was increased from £20 to £25 in May 2005 and then to £30 in November 2005.

 

Just wondered if anyone has used this as part of thier Court claim, that they increased the FEE or so called SERVICE charge by 50% in a space of 6 months, surely they cannot justify such a huge increase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update so far, sent a letter on 12th April requesting all the Select Account Fees taken from the account to be refunded unless they could supply a signed copy of the agreement.

Had a reply 25th April saying:

 

"The account was upgraded on 30th April 2001 when a bank loan was taken out with them, As it is nearly 6 years ago you can forget what has been agreed and I can assure you the account would not have been upgraded without your permission, it would be difficult to retrieve a copy of the agreement as they are kept in central storage."

 

Also on 12th April S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) was sent in a seperate envelope and by recorded delivery list of charges just received but only to Sep 2001, Hand delivered the prelim today dated 26th April 2007 requesting charges back, received a letter this morning from TSB dated 21st May 2007, refusing to refund the charges (not even asked for them yet).

Sounds like the standard letter but it is stating these charges are a charge for a service they are not default charges because you have not broken your agreement.(yes she has).

 

So what kind of service was given in Jul 03 to justify a service charge of £240.

 

I think they have presumed the first request for a refund of £395 for the fees on the Select account, was a bank charge refund, obviously they are not even reading what iis being sent to them.

 

If anyone could advise please if it is better to complain to FOS for the £395 Select account fee, I have read somewhere that if the FOS get involved it costs the bank £350, thought they would rather pay the fees back than do this.

 

I will of course use all the procedures on this site for the charges, as that is over £3000 excluding interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

No joy on the Select account fee, sent all paperwork to FOS regarding this account fee last week as 8 weeks as passed and no refund or satisfactory reply.

 

LBA sent 12th June for bank charges of £3200 it will be interesting to see how FOS respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...