Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ony vs Natwest (Cobbetts) Need Help!


ony
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I seem to have got myself in a real pickle. On the advice of friends who had completed the process I submitted what appears to be an incorrectly compiled POC. I submitted that with a schedule of charges and refund letter to NatWest. I didnt send the LBA, again on sibling advice as NatWest failed to acknowledge receipt of my refund request.

 

I called West London CC and asked whether I needed to break up my claim as inc interest it amounts to £8582.91 ( Interest £7001.91 & charges £1582.00) but now I see from the AQ that I cannot fast track it, or can I? Was I incorrectly advised?

 

And it gets worse I was also advised to use an interest rate of 29.5%, which I did. (My nerves are shot!)

 

I have attached pertinent documents:

 

1/ Details of Cobbets defence

2/ Refund request

3/ Charges schedule

4/ POC

 

I have downloaded a form from the court allowing me to amend my POC stating my reasons being:

 

"Unaware of the proper procedure I incorrectly submitted insufficient and improperly compiled information on my original Particulars of Claim. This I have now amended. NatWest in their defence received today 16.5.07 have asked the court that I be given the opportunity to properly particularise my claim which I now believe I have done."

 

I know I've botched it up (thats the last time I take sibling advice) and any advice is much needed and doubly appreciated.

 

What do I do next?

 

TIA

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its seems I am going to have to try to pull my fat out of the fire here (good lesson learned, follow the directions given to the letter).

 

Should I restart my claim or will this work?

 

1/ have asked for an amendment to my POC to which I have attached a new I believe properly completed POC. My excuse "Unaware of the proper procedure I was to follow I incorrectly submitted insufficient and improperly compiled information on my original Particulars of Claim Form. I have now completed a new form and would ask the court with the utmost of respect to consider this new claim form and continue proceedings." I have also included the proper POC content (duly amended) from this site in the amendment and new POC. Here's hoping I get an understanding judge! Need I add that NatWest "On allocation the defendent invites teh court to direct that there be a case management conference in order to consider the making of appropriate orders t the claimant the opportunity to properly particularise the claim"?

 

2/ Completed AQ (as directed here) one point can I ask for small claims (Charges £1581.00, interest £7001.91; total £8582.91) am still not too clear on this?

3/ Attach Do + Other info letter to AQ and send to Cobbetts and Court

4/ PRAY......

 

Is that about it?

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel I'm getting somewhere here but now stuck between a rock and a hard place. As I have already included interest at 29.5% as directed (other site) I have included their POC details as shown in my new POC (attached).

 

What to do? Should I continue with the 29.5% or nix it, and go with the POC details shown here?

 

progress is being made.

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello ony

I think dont panic not too sure about the procedure required only i did remember that i read a thread/post about ammending your claim at the stage you are

have a good look

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/47344-claim-too-vague-defence.html

 

And dont worry about the vauge or lloyds bit in the title the ruling point of law as a they are in that instance apply directly to what it is your after also read the nasty west forum guide on applying interest etc and probably the safest tryed and proven way is to use the inertest spreadsheets available that apply the interest and produce the scheduales you will need

fidz

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=red]Now your here & I've your attention pls atleast [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=#ff0000]look at[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [URL="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/"][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/[/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/URL] [B]:eek: Deadline to sign up by: [/B]21 May 2007 – [B]Signatures:[/B] 1,333 (as at 17/05):shock: [URL="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Penaltycharges/"][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=darkgreen][B]http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Penaltycharges/[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/URL] [FONT=Times New Roman]that Berwick v lloyds case judgement [/FONT] [SIZE=1][SIZE=1][FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black]Analysed and surmised in concise plain English[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] by 1 of our admins[/SIZE] [URL]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-825486.html[/URL] [SIZE=1]& by[/SIZE][SIZE=3] R B R EARS[/SIZE] [U][COLOR=darkgreen][URL]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-827833.html[/URL][/COLOR][/U] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=black]All the best.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=4][COLOR=navy][I]FIDZ[/I][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=4][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2][COLOR=#ff0000]Any of my Advice & opinions and guidance are personal, not endorsed by C A G or Bank Action Group, are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fidz,

 

thanks for both of those. the amended claim thread really helped. But got to admit the interest calculator is greek to me; totally confused. I used another spreadsheet from another site that compounded interest and all I had to do was input charges/dates and interest rate & that was it. I just dont get the interest charged/interest date. and then the interest on penalties column doesnt update.

 

And then Nasty west havent included myn interest rate in the statements sent in the later years. Its just 'interet'.

 

I'm at a loss... Am I being exceeding stupid or what..

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

relax ony you read as tired and confusded and uber stressed, thats understandable but your not doing yourself any favors and could potentialy do more damage than good seriously relax & calm yourself Ka Ka Ka 'chill with the still' as is said.

 

my advice i'd be carfull about the compound interest stuff that could turn around and bite you later try get some rest now.

 

I guess (but am not sure) you can apply the same rate as 'nasty west' apply to you , stands to logic if you ask me.

more over there is 'contractual interest' being writen about on this site as having been used sucsessfully i'm not sure as yet how when or where to apply that yet as i havent delved into that enuf as yet so i 'm gonna have to say best thing look and do some research. i think tis mentioned and linked on one of the posts in the thread i linked eariler. if not there then definatly in one of the most recent theads in the banking or welcome sections.

 

So best safe now than sorry later as i said get some rest and have afresh look later try again to use this sites charges and interest calc as i said it will produce the schedule of charges and interest for you. the colums should update unless you leave or enter an unrecognised charecter one of the cells it would then ahve a cascadeing affect. that could be the issue.

 

sorry i cant be of more help now i also need some sleep my self.

 

PLease dont' misundersand you can also count on me but am non sure of how much more help i can give am kinda new here and still finding my feet

only am more than willing to help in any way i can and your quirees help me too so I'll monitor this thread. But I srtongly uge you to get in contact with a site moderator their names are highlighted in all the active members and users list in the root of the forum. for more support and to clarify any thing you need ie the calc and to verify all of the above and that your making the corect steps

 

laterz for a few hours

  • Haha 1

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=red]Now your here & I've your attention pls atleast [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=#ff0000]look at[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [URL="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/"][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/[/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/URL] [B]:eek: Deadline to sign up by: [/B]21 May 2007 – [B]Signatures:[/B] 1,333 (as at 17/05):shock: [URL="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Penaltycharges/"][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=darkgreen][B]http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Penaltycharges/[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/URL] [FONT=Times New Roman]that Berwick v lloyds case judgement [/FONT] [SIZE=1][SIZE=1][FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black]Analysed and surmised in concise plain English[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] by 1 of our admins[/SIZE] [URL]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-825486.html[/URL] [SIZE=1]& by[/SIZE][SIZE=3] R B R EARS[/SIZE] [U][COLOR=darkgreen][URL]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-827833.html[/URL][/COLOR][/U] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=black]All the best.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=4][COLOR=navy][I]FIDZ[/I][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=4][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2][COLOR=#ff0000]Any of my Advice & opinions and guidance are personal, not endorsed by C A G or Bank Action Group, are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just a simple case of putting in an amended claim.

 

It's imperative that you progress as is if your claim will be subject to a full hearing - people have being getting complacent and seem to think that court is a rubber stamping exercise.

 

If no-one as helped you in the next through days then I will help you with an amended claim. Look at my previous thread for examples.

Advice, information, data, opinions, etc of JustWon, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

If I don't respond please don't think I am ignoring you as, due to other commitments, I have little time to spend on the board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you're perfectly entitled to claim C/I at their own unauthorised borrowing rate, just din't forget to put in s69 in the alternative,

it's good you've got Justwon helping, i must admit to nicking a lot of very useful stuff off his threads for my claims:D

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I first say Fidz thanks for the very good advice. I was going out of my box at one stage, chain smoking but calmed down and began to get my head around things. I made some headway and I think I have it right but all the legal jargon scares the daylights out of me; just creates brain freeze. Anyway will soldier on. Progress so far. [Will PM a moderator for advice].

 

OK got the spreedsheet to work and will post should I need further aid (which is likely :oops:) But much THX, very much appreciated.

 

you're perfectly entitled to claim C/I at their own unauthorised borrowing rate, just din't forget to put in s69 in the alternative,

 

'In the alternative'? Is this what you mean?

From http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

Value:

 

Charges £xx.xx (total charges)

Overdraft Interest £xx.xx (Total interest on charges at 29.5%)

Interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 £xxx.xx (8% from Spreadsheet)

Court Fee £xx.xx

 

TOTAL £ xx.xx (combined total from above)

 

Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £xx.xx per day [(enter daily rate here - (CHARGES+OD interest)x 0.00022 = pence per day)] OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

 

Am I therefore asking the court to award me 29.5% & 8% on charges since March 2001 + a further 8% from the issue of claim? Isnt that a bit much or did I miss something again?

It's just a simple case of putting in an amended claim.

 

It's imperative that you progress as is if your claim will be subject to a full hearing - people have being getting complacent and seem to think that court is a rubber stamping exercise.

 

Well you got me figured out. :oops:

 

Ok so I have completed and amended claim form (N244). My amendment reads:

 

because: 'the claimant did not adequately particularise his claim in that he did not specify the common law and statutory provisions upon which the claim relies and incorrectly completed the original Particulars of Claim form.'

 

Part C: 'I respectfully request that the court allows an amendment to my particulars of claim. Unaware of the proper procedure I incorrectly submitted insufficient and improperly compiled information on my original Particulars of Claim.

 

I would also like to note that the Defendent has asked the court in their defence; Section 3- "On allocation the Defendent invites the court to direct that there be a case management conference in order to consider the making of appropriate orders to give the claimant the opportunity to properly particularise the claim." [Do I need this]

 

I would submit that I have now revised my original claim and taken sufficient opportunity to properly particularise the claim as evidenced in the attached new Particulars of Claim. [Do I need this]

 

I would hope therefore that my claim can proceed as normal.' [Do I need this]

 

On to the POC itself; I have been reading this two threads;

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

&

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/15172-reply-stock-defence-18-a.html#post116506

 

Which to go with? I am of the mind to go with the latter post (as it appears to speed up the process) but that legal jargon again (T&C's no longer on website) etc. I have been to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/90742-natwest-terms-conditions.html

for Natwest T&C's but seeing as I have had the account for over 15 years shouldnt I expect to rely on T&C's from then and not the most recent loop hole closing renditions? And if so where to get them?

 

Given I am submitting a request to an amend my POC to the court this latter new POC becomes my 'true' POC and so I need not submit a copy to Natwest.

 

 

Much THX, very much appreciated.

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the template answers for the N150 AQ.

 

My claim is for £8700 (29.5% interest). I have followed the template and have asked the court to move it to the small claims track citing the template response to be used in the Other information section.

 

My question is, while it is up to the judge to decide, should I select Fast Track in the Track section or Small Claims track and add the same information as used in the Other Information field into the field provided under 'select an appropriate track' where it states; 'If you have indicated a track which would not be the normal track for the claim, please give brief reasons for your choice'?

 

THX

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I just received a 'goodwill' letter from NatWest for £1454.00 (no interest) which I am of course refusing for the big enchillada with full intrest applied.

 

Where can I find the response to goodwill gesture from bank?

 

Also in their letter NatWest state: "We explain all of our terms and conditions including our fees and charges at the account opening and they form the basis of your agreement with us. Full deetails are available at any time on our website and in our branches, and updates are sent out regularky to our customers."

 

In my original request I never included a request for the original T&C's at time of signing my agreement. As they refer to and included the most recent version BUT NOT th one I originally signed. Should I then ask for it directly in effect rejecting the most recent one received as it should cement my request for payment and will show to court Natwest's intransigence (should they not provide it which is I assume likely)?

 

Can I add this to my goodwill response letter. Found here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

duly amendd of course!!

 

"You are also reminded of my request that you forward a copy of the Terms and Conditions that were in force at the time my account was opened, and any subsequent amendments to those Terms and Conditions. These are requested under CPR Pre-Action Protocol 4.6©, and your continued failure to provide them will be brought to the attention of the court, should it be necessary to commence a county court action."

 

NatWest Goodwill letters attached

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them one of these ony - Rejecting Offers - just adapt to suit your case.

 

With regards to T&C's............... either ask them for a copy or have a look on Martin3030's thread (nat west terms and conditions).

 

Good luck, hedgey xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Hedgey!

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to check I got this right as I made a pigs ear of my POC. NatWest sent me a good will gesture of charges only less interest. The amount offered was also lower than my computed charges. The included an attached form for me to sign accepting 'full and final settlement', no cheque or payment was made.

 

I have reviewed this and my intended letter is as below: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

***

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx

 

I respectfully decline your offer of Full and Final settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totalling £xxxx including interest of XX

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary. I also reject the further conditions of acceptance that you have attached to this offer, namely I DONT PUT MY ACCEPTANCE OF FULL/FINAL SETTLMENT HERE DO I?

 

If you do not accept my own conditions for acceptance, or you do not respond within 7 days, I shall proceed with legal action. For the avoidance of doubt, I wish to stress that I do not accept your offer under the terms stated in your letter.

 

I also note from your letter dated xx/xx/xx that refer to the terms and condition that 'form the basis of your agreement with us'. I would therefore ask under (IS THERE ANY LEGAL PRECEDENT I CAN INCLUDE HERE) that you furnish me with a copy of the original terms and conditions used at the time I opened an account with you as these were the terms upon which the our agreement was based.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

****

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest keep charging me.... despite the fact I have submitted docs to court (AQ), have a goodwill gesture from them. Is there no way to prevent them doing this (letter) or should I just call asking them to return the cash..?

 

thx

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest in their defence received today 16.5.07 have asked the court that I be given the opportunity to properly particularise my claim which I now believe I have done.

 

I shouldn't worry about that. Cobbetts always say this - it is them trying to intimidate you.

 

As your claim is over £5000 it may get allocated to the Fast Track but that will become clear when you get your AQ (if you get one). It is possible that you might get allocated to the Small Claims Track even so. The AQ has a box to fill in for you to say why you think it should go to a particular track.

 

in the meantime, follow hedgey's advice

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shouldn't worry about that. Cobbetts always say this - it is them trying to intimidate you.

 

As your claim is over £5000 it may get allocated to the Fast Track but that will become clear when you get your AQ (if you get one). It is possible that you might get allocated to the Small Claims Track even so. The AQ has a box to fill in for you to say why you think it should go to a particular track.

 

in the meantime, follow hedgey's advice

 

Indeed and I have to the T (thx hedgey) but I have to admit I made a right balls up of my POC.

 

Called the court 5mins ago and told my amended POC was accepted and AQ infront of District Judge. Here's hoping for the fast track.

 

My immediate concern is to get Natwest to repay some £150 in charges to my account given am a) taking them to court for £8G and b) they have made an offer to repay my charges over 6 years (less interest).

 

I am assuming a call is due; need quote any particular case law or just the facts as they are?

 

thx

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ony

 

I don't have any confidence that you telling them that you are currently taking them to court for £8k etc will make the sligtest difference to what they do about the £150.

 

Is the £150 for one particular month? (my daughter got £170 in charges over 1 weekend with NW - but that's another story). You could just try ringing your branch and asking for it back. I thas been known to work.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ony

 

I don't have any confidence that you telling them that you are currently taking them to court for £8k etc will make the sligtest difference to what they do about the £150.

 

Aint that the truth.....

 

Will give them a call! Who dares....

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I originally screwed up my POC and had a court case yesterday 2/7/07 on accepting amendment which was successful. I

 

completed an AQ over a month ago and sent a schedule of payments etc both court and NatWest some time ago and just heard yesterday that court date is set for 30th october. In my AQ I included the template for the Draft Order of Directives and was wondering what to do next. In the Draft order is says "claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order send t the Defendent and Court..... If Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order."

 

Now I am assuming that I must wait for the court to send me confirmation of the service of the order at which time I need to resend schedule, copies of statements, statement of evidence (whats this??) and copies of decided cases and other legal materials (where are these??) to both court and defendant?

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again ony, don't worry for the moment - you need to see if the judge grants the draft order for directions first. If he/she does - post back and we'll advise you which documents you need.

 

Don't worry - wait for directions from the court first! x ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again ony, don't worry for the moment....Don't worry - wait for directions from the court first! x ;)

 

Hey hedgey was I that obvious? ;)

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so received letter from the court confirming acceptance of draft order and request to use small claims track (£8600 claim):

 

Claimant shall by 25 July...;

 

a) schedule of each charge

b) copies of any statement...

c) statement of evidence of all matters relied upon.... (???)

d) copies of decided cases and other legal materials....(???)

 

What now, thx!

  • Barclaycard (2 Accounts) CCA sent to both on 20.5.07 (defaulted)
  • MBNA CCA defaulted 14.6.07 (Claim £2600)
  • Capital one: Reject offer LBA 18.6.07
  • HSBC/Metropolitan/DG Solicitors: Credit agreement not found by DG Solicitors. Sent new CCA to Metropolitan 18.6.07 with original timeline 18th May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's brilliant news ony........... wise judge! You're on the home straight now!

 

You need:

a) Up to date schedule of charges - make sure there's a description of each charge on it.

b) Copies of bank statements (the ones that have charges on them)

c) and d) Have a look in the nat west sticky on T&C's - there's a statement of evidence by stevepm in there (think it's number 39 but I'm not sure).

 

Also (I'm at work at the mo so haven't got a 'links' document open!), go to the main forum page and scroll up to the 'Guide to the Later Stages'. There's a sticky in there called 'Got a Court Date' - read through the sticky as it shows you everything that you need to put together for c) and d).

 

Hopefully, somebody can post some links up for you - if not, I'll post later with the links.

 

Best of luck mate :D :D

  • Haha 1

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ony

 

hedgey has told you everything you need for a) to c). For d) you need http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...