Jump to content


District Judge Cooke. On a mission?


podgydad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I run a regulated Claims Management company and this morning received a General Form of Judgement from Judge Cooke basically suggesting we were committing a criminal offence under section 20, 21, and 22 of the Solicitors Act 1974.

 

We are of course seeking legal advice on this issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OMG

whatever next ??????

:mad:

If I have been helpful, PLEASE click the scales

 

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

 

I WON !!!!

 

 

HERE WE GO AGAIN .... BRING IT ON

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I run a regulated Claims Management company and this morning received a General Form of Judgement from Judge Cooke basically suggesting we were committing a criminal offence under section 20, 21, and 22 of the Solicitors Act 1974.

 

We are of course seeking legal advice on this issue.

I predict that his recent actions will completely clear his court of bank charges claims within the next few months - would anyone risk using Birmingham from now on ?

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I predict that his recent actions will completely clear his court of bank charges claims within the next few months - would anyone risk using Birmingham from now on ?

 

Of course, if one was being cynical one could suggest that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd.

 

Is someone out to make a name for themselves?

13th Nov 2006 - Preliminary Letter delivered to branch

30th Nov 2006 - LBA - deliverered to branch

30th Nov 2006 - Standard 'we are looking into this letter'

15th Dec 2006 - SAR delivered to branch to demand six years statements (currently pursuing 5 years)

19th Dec 2006 -750 Pounds offered as settlement. Accepted as PART settlement 20th Dec 2006.

Filed with MCOL online - Notice of issue from 17th Jan 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I run a regulated Claims Management company and this morning received a General Form of Judgement from Judge Cooke basically suggesting we were committing a criminal offence under section 20, 21, and 22 of the Solicitors Act 1974.

 

We are of course seeking legal advice on this issue.

 

Somebody shake that Judge's hand.

  • Haha 1

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sections 20 - 22 of the Solicitors Act 1974:

 

20.Unqualified person not to act as solicitor

(1) No unqualified person shall –

(a) act as a solicitor, or as such issue any writ or process, or commence, prosecute or defend any action, suit or other proceeding, in his own name or in the name of any other person, in any court of civil or criminal jurisdiction; or

(b) act as a solicitor in any cause or matter, civil or criminal, to be heard or determined before any justice or justices or any commissioners of Her Majesty’s revenue.

(2) Any person who contravenes the provisions of subsection (1) –

(a) shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for not more than two years or to a fine or to both; and

(b) shall be guilty of contempt of the court in which the action, suit, cause, matter or proceeding in relation to which he so acts is brought or taken and may be punished accordingly;

© [repealed]

[NOTES
1. Section 27(10) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 provides that section 20 shall not apply in relation to any act done in the exercise of a right of audience, and section 28(6) of that Act provides that section 20 shall not apply in relation to any act done in the exercise of a right to conduct litigation.

2. Section 9(3) of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 provides that, notwithstanding section 24(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974, section 20 shall not apply to a recognised body (i.e. an incorporated practice recognised under section 9 of the 1985 Act).

3. Further amendment of section 20 by Schedule 18 paragraph 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (containing further exemptions from section 20) not yet in force as at 31st March 1999.]

21. Unqualified person not to pretend to be a solicitor

Any unqualified person who wilfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he is, qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the fourth level on the standard scale.

22. Unqualified person not to prepare certain instruments

(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (2A), any unqualified person who directly or indirectly –

(a) draws or prepares any instrument of transfer or charge for the purposes of the Land Registration Act 1925, or makes any application or lodges any document for registration under that Act at the registry, or

(b) draws or prepares any other instrument relating to real or personal estate, or any legal proceeding,

shall, unless he proves that the act was not done for or in expectation of any fee, gain or reward, be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to –

(a) a barrister or duly certificated notary public;

(aa) a registered trade mark agent drawing or preparing any instrument relating to any design or trade mark;

(ab) a registered patent agent drawing or preparing any instrument relating to any invention, design, technical information or trade mark;

(ac) any accredited person drawing or preparing any instrument –

(i) which creates, or which he believes on reasonable grounds will create, a farm business tenancy (within the meaning of the Agricultural Tenancies Act 1995), or

(ii) which relates to an existing tenancy which is, or which he believes on reasonable grounds to be, such a tenancy;

(b) any public officer drawing or preparing instruments or applications in the course of his duty;

© any person employed merely to engross any instrument, application or proceeding;

and paragraph (b) of that subsection does not apply to a duly certificated solicitor in Scotland.

(2A) Subsection (1) also does not apply to any act done by a person at the direction and under the supervision of another person if –

(a) that other person was at the time his employer, a partner of his employer or a fellow employee; and

(b) the act could have been done by that other person for or in expectation of any fee, gain or reward without committing an offence under this section.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b), "instrument" includes a contract for the sale or other disposition of land (except a contract to grant such a lease as is referred to in section 54(2) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (short leases)), but does not include –

(a) a will or other testamentary instrument;

(b) an agreement not intended to be executed as a deed other than a contract that is included by virtue of the preceding provisions of this subsection;

© a letter or power of attorney; or

(d) a transfer of stock containing no trust or limitation thereof.

(3A) In subsection (2) –

"accredited person" means any person who is –

(a) a Full Member of the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers,

(b) an Associate or Fellow of the Incorporated Society of Valuers and Auctioneers, or

© an Associate or Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors;

"registered trade mark agent" has the same meaning as in the Trade Marks Act 1994; and

"registered patent agent" has the same meaning as in section 275(1) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

(4) A local weights and measures authority may institute proceedings for an offence under this section.

Found on The Law Society

 

I think section 20 is probably most relevant and is the reason podgydad has had a letter from the Judge.

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't agree with Mindzai more.

 

20.Unqualified person not to act as solicitor

(1) No unqualified person shall –

(a) act as a solicitor, or as such issue any writ or process, or commence, prosecute or defend any action, suit or other proceeding, in his own name or in the name of any other person, in any court of civil or criminal jurisdiction; or

(b) act as a solicitor in any cause or matter, civil or criminal, to be heard or determined before any justice or justices or any commissioners of Her Majesty’s revenue.

(2) Any person who contravenes the provisions of subsection (1) –

(a) shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for not more than two years or to a fine or to both; and

(b) shall be guilty of contempt of the court in which the action, suit, cause, matter or proceeding in relation to which he so acts is brought or taken and may be punished accordingly;

© [repealed]

21. Unqualified person not to pretend to be a solicitor

Any unqualified person who wilfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he is, qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the fourth level on the standard scale.

22. Unqualified person not to prepare certain instruments

(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (2A), any unqualified person who directly or indirectly –

(a) draws or prepares any instrument of transfer or charge for the purposes of the Land Registration Act 1925, or makes any application or lodges any document for registration under that Act at the registry, or

(b) draws or prepares any other instrument relating to real or personal estate, or any legal proceeding,

shall, unless he proves that the act was not done for or in expectation of any fee, gain or reward, be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to –

(a) a barrister or duly certificated notary public;

(aa) a registered trade mark agent drawing or preparing any instrument relating to any design or trade mark;

(ab) a registered patent agent drawing or preparing any instrument relating to any invention, design, technical information or trade mark;

(ac) any accredited person drawing or preparing any instrument –

(i) which creates, or which he believes on reasonable grounds will create, a farm business tenancy (within the meaning of the Agricultural Tenancies Act 1995), or

(ii) which relates to an existing tenancy which is, or which he believes on reasonable grounds to be, such a tenancy;

(b) any public officer drawing or preparing instruments or applications in the course of his duty;

© any person employed merely to engross any instrument, application or proceeding;

and paragraph (b) of that subsection does not apply to a duly certificated solicitor in Scotland.

(2A) Subsection (1) also does not apply to any act done by a person at the direction and under the supervision of another person if –

(a) that other person was at the time his employer, a partner of his employer or a fellow employee; and

(b) the act could have been done by that other person for or in expectation of any fee, gain or reward without committing an offence under this section.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b), "instrument" includes a contract for the sale or other disposition of land (except a contract to grant such a lease as is referred to in section 54(2) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (short leases)), but does not include –

(a) a will or other testamentary instrument;

(b) an agreement not intended to be executed as a deed other than a contract that is included by virtue of the preceding provisions of this subsection;

© a letter or power of attorney; or

(d) a transfer of stock containing no trust or limitation thereof.

(3A) In subsection (2) –

"accredited person" means any person who is –

(a) a Full Member of the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers,

(b) an Associate or Fellow of the Incorporated Society of Valuers and Auctioneers, or

© an Associate or Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors;

"registered trade mark agent" has the same meaning as in the Trade Marks Act 1994; and

"registered patent agent" has the same meaning as in section 275(1) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

(4) A local weights and measures authority may institute proceedings for an offence under this section.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucid you beat me to it!!

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(a) act as a solicitor, or as such issue any writ or process, or commence, prosecute or defend any action, suit or other proceeding, in his own name or in the name of any other person, in any court of civil or criminal jurisdiction

That doesn't sound right. Am I a bit stoopid?

If, in commencing a county court action in your own name, does this mean you are acting as a solicitor, and therefore , cannot do it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

(a) act as a solicitor, or as such issue any writ or process, or commence, prosecute or defend any action, suit or other proceeding, in his own name or in the name of any other person, in any court of civil or criminal jurisdiction

That doesn't sound right. Am I a bit stoopid?

If, in commencing a county court action in your own name, does this mean you are acting as a solicitor, and therefore , cannot do it?

 

You can prepare it on behalf of another person, as long as it is not for profit or gain. Of course the solution is just to pass all the paperwork to a solicitor and get them to sign it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is referring to making money out of other people's claims.

 

LOL Rory - I just noticed. :D

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can revel in it all you like Mindzai, however the end result will be less people claiming. Not much to celebrate really is it?

 

No the end result will be less people's money finding it's way to unqualified cowboys instead of actual legal professionals. Anyone who doesn't want to claim themselves can easily employ a solicitor rather than some chancer who doesn't know what he's doing (as so aptly demonstrated by yourself in the first post of this thread ;)).

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too quote my earlier post

 

"Couldn't agree with Mindzai more."

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the end result will be less people's money finding it's way to unqualified cowboys instead of actual legal professionals. Anyone who doesn't want to claim themselves can easily employ a solicitor rather than some chancer who doesn't know what he's doing (as so aptly demonstrated by yourself in the first post of this thread ;)).

 

No, solicitors aren't really interested, people will simply not claim. I also take offense at being called a chancer and a cowboy. Please refrain from personal insults, I believe the forum rules state quite clearly that this is not allowed. I rely on my legal counsel to advise me, this issue was never flagged to me. Now that it has, I'm awaiting advice on a solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's just keep this thread nice and friendly folks. :) Don't start slagging people off, or else! :mad:

 

Podgydad didn't need to post this here, and we're grateful that he did. :)

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Regulated Claims Management Company's where highley qualified people who would have the knowledge and expertise to work for clients, it would seem that I was wrong.

pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. The judge may have been talking about this particular company, not claims companies in general.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I misreading all this?

 

Surley the key words in this regulation are "To Act as a solicitor", if you are not claiming to be a qualified solicitor, or signing paperwork as a solicitor then surley no offence is being commited.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...