Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yea but the annoying this is that they're not based in england so they won't even come. Just a 2mo delay for no apparent reason.
    • Hi dx, thanks. Yes actually, that is the case with this one! I've taken tomorrow off work, I need to review the whole binder for each of these and I'll refrain from further questions until I do just that. Just on hold for court ref Claim #2
    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Worth a shot!


Titch28
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6118 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

 

I've finally managed to get around to registering on here. What a brilliant site by the way, good to see there's so many people willing to help out there. I have received my bank statements for the last six years and I'm in the process of cross checking this with my internet banking, just to make doubley sure. I plan to send off my claim letter this week, I think it's about £1500 worth of charges. Fingers crossed no other judges rule against us mere mortals, that are just trying to get back what's rightfully ours!

 

Good luck all, speak to you soon

 

Titch

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi titch, are you blind like that cat? Good luck with your claim. Not sure if you're aware but Lloyds won a case yesterday in Birmingham, there's a long thread on the ins and outs in the Lloyds forum, i'd give it a read. It is by no means the end of this as it was just one case in a court where laws can't be set so no Judge in the land is bound to follow suit. Indeed up until this point there has been no other bank victories and it would appear that this one was just a fluke.

 

Good luck and if you need any help you know where I am.

 

 

r-t-v

25/01/07 Statements collected online

27/01/07 Prelim sent

09/02/07 Thank you letter received (and duly ignored)

12/02/07 LBA on its way

27/02/07 MCOL filed

26/03/07 Defence entered

02/04/07 Notice of transfer paperwork received

10/04/07 Lattie's hastner sent

19/04/07 AQ arrived (never mind lattie!)

20/04/07 Last Chance letter sent to DG, AQ filled out.

08/05/07 AQ returned to courts, cc'd to DG

11/06/07 Request for the defence to be struck out sent after not hearing from the court for 5 long weeks.

14/06/07 Directions hearing set for the end of August. 10 long weeks away.

14/06/07 rob-the-viking waits yet longer......

23/08/07 DG apply for a stay, instantly granted by judge.

29/08/07 The waiting begins again, 7 months since prelim was sent.

 

"If you kick a Tiger in the ass, you'd better have a plan to deal with it's teeth!!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK I've finally sorted myself out and have prepared my request for repayment of charges letter today with a breakdown of all charges I've paid in the last 6 years attached. My question is where do I send it? My local branch or a particular department? All help gratefully received.

 

Many Thanks

 

T

:)

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant thanks for that, I will post it on my way home tonight.

Will update as and when/if things happen.

 

Thanks again Barty

 

T

:)

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I received a letter back from the Recovery Centre at Andover, it's almost 2 pages long (yawn!). General idea is we're sorry you're unhappy, they're not default charges, so you're entitled to nothing . . . so leave us alone. Obviously that's my interpretation of it. So what next? MCOL?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Titch

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have re-read the FAQ's etc so would it be right for me to send an LBA to the recovery Centre at Andover?

Please help me I don't want to get this wrong.

 

Thanks

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Titch noticed your not sure on where to send your letters to Lloyds so here's a list of contacts you might find useful. :)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/236-lloyds-tsb-contact-details.html

  • Haha 1

Come on the mighty reds!!!!!!

 

Lloyds TSB - Success - 14/7/07

Lloyds TSB - Pending -

Halifax - Pending -

 

 

Tip my scales if I have been of assistance :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Red.

I sent my LBA to Andover recovery centre, their letter said to reply to them if I had any further queries. Should I send a copy to the other address too?

 

Ta

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally used the addresses in that list of contacts, but to be honest I never ever received a reply to my LBA so I wouldnt worry. Stick to your timescale, they only seem to settle once court action is started.

Come on the mighty reds!!!!!!

 

Lloyds TSB - Success - 14/7/07

Lloyds TSB - Pending -

Halifax - Pending -

 

 

Tip my scales if I have been of assistance :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just wait for now then. I don't suppose it matters which part of LTSB you're being ignored by does it!

Thanks Red, going to have a look for your thread now.

 

:)

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Titch

Have you had any feed back from your LBA yet.

I sent mine the day after yours and didnt get notification from RM online so I sent a second one on Monday. Im wondering as it was the weekend that they had the RM strike if a few items went missing. Im counting 14 days from today before court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No reply yet Roy but then I don't expect to receive one to be honest just going through the motions. I'm filing MCOL on 10 August as I will have given them 28 days notice then, I know I shouldn't be nice to them but am intrigued to see if anything will come back due to the speed they replied to my prelim letter, I had a reply within a week of sending it!

SAR sent 07/03/07

Statements rec'd 14/04/07 (ish)

Prelim Sent 03/07/07

Prelim rejection rec'd 10/07/07

LBA sent 12/07/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...