Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
    • surprised you gave that frost article the light of day HB Long been the case that no further evidence of his wing-nutishness needed. Heck he even railed against the rubbish grate deal he largely created
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

"There is no sustainable claim for causing loss or for breach of duty - the only sustainable claim is for breach of contract - thus no exemplary or aggravated damages are applicable," said the NatWest's barrister.

"The interests of the consumer will not be damaged if the case is struck out.

"The Office of Fair Trading has that role and its enquiry is underway to examine the issue Mr Brennan is vexed about," he concluded."

Is this Natwest's own legal represenative admitting that the charges are unlawful???

 

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

"There is no sustainable claim for causing loss or for breach of duty - the only sustainable claim is for breach of contract - thus no exemplary or aggravated damages are applicable,"

 

I think he meant the claim for "Causing loss or for breach of duty" was in his opinion not justified.

 

The claim for "Breach of contract" could be pursued, but even if proven, by law no exemplary or aggravated damages would be applicable.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly I've just been reading over a Bank of Scotland charge letter and it clearly states that the charges are "to cover our costs". It seems to me, therefor, that they would have a hard time employing the Berwick defence in the face of their own statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly I've just been reading over a Bank of Scotland charge letter and it clearly states that the charges are "to cover our costs". It seems to me, therefor, that they would have a hard time employing the Berwick defence in the face of their own statement.

 

Yes but does it qualify what costs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Falkirk1298,

 

That to me looks like valuable evidence -- "to cover our costs" excludes making a profit. I think GaryH on his thread calling for T&C and documents would be very interested in getting his hands on this letter.

 

If they exclude making a profit, it implies they do not regard it as a service rendered to the customer. Nobody performs a commercial service at cost price.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mister I don't think it's the 'smoking gun' we would all like to see but it together with all the other snippets of info being collected by the site might help prove their charges ARE penalty charges & not as they claim a service charge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but does it qualify what costs?

 

This is what the relevant paragraph says:

 

"To cover our costs, we make a charge of £39 (maximum three charges per day) for any item we can't pay. We will take this money from your account seven days from the date of this letter. If this causes you to have an unauthorised overdraft, we will also charge you interest, at the unauthorised rate, and a monthly unauthorised overdraft fee of £28*. However, if your unauthorised overdraft is £30 or less the unauthorised overdraft charge will not be applied."

 

Note there's also a breach of section 5.5 of the banking Code in there, which states that:

 

"Before we take interest or charges for standard

account services from your current or savings

account, we will give you at least 14 days’ notice of

how much we will take."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note there's also a breach of section 5.5 of the banking Code in there, which states that:

 

"Before we take interest or charges for standard

account services from your current or savings

account, we will give you at least 14 days’ notice of

how much we will take."

 

Prenotification of standard account services interest and charges was brought in industry-wide by government some years ago, the key word being "standard" (monthly charges and interest). Bouncing cheques would be deemed minority adhoc events.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the relevant paragraph says:

 

"To cover our costs, we make a charge of £39 (maximum three charges per day) for any item we can't pay. We will take this money from your account seven days from the date of this letter. If this causes you to have an unauthorised overdraft, we will also charge you interest, at the unauthorised rate, and a monthly unauthorised overdraft fee of £28*. However, if your unauthorised overdraft is £30 or less the unauthorised overdraft charge will not be applied."

 

Note there's also a breach of section 5.5 of the banking Code in there, which states that:

 

"Before we take interest or charges for standard

account services from your current or savings

account, we will give you at least 14 days’ notice of

how much we will take."

 

This could well be part of the smoking gun.

 

Even at the most loose translation they appear to be admitting that their charge IS a penalty charge as it differs in application to their 'normal' charge.

 

I assume you have sent this to the MODS with a simular comment

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the relevant paragraph says:

 

"To cover our costs, we make a charge of £39 (maximum three charges per day) for any item we can't pay. (We will take this money from your account seven days from the date of this letter). If this causes you to have an unauthorised overdraft, we will also charge you interest, at the unauthorised rate, and a monthly unauthorised overdraft fee of £28*. However, if your unauthorised overdraft is £30 or less the unauthorised overdraft charge will not be applied."

 

Note there's also a breach of section 5.5 of the banking Code in there, which states that:

 

"Before we take interest or charges for standard

account services from your current or savings

account, we will give you at least 14 days’ notice of

how much we will take."[/quote]

 

So what is 7 days or 14 days before they take their charge out of an account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter Reference: JD/HCALET5

 

9th May 2007

 

007478/0059/0370XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXDear XXX XXXXXXX

We are writing to make you aware that a transaction you have made has been returned unpaid. As a result you have incurred charges on your account. Details of the charge you have incurred are shown in the table below. As we have been unable to pay an item, you may want to contact the payee to make alternative arrangements.Transaction[ XXXXX] Amount[£50.00] Charge[FAILED ITEM £39.00] Charge AmountDate[16TH MAY 2007] this will be taken from your accountXXXXX XXXXX .

We will also charge you debit interest on any overdraft. The monthly unauthorised interest rate will apply to the amount which is in excess of your agreed overdraft limit.We would like to help you avoid incurring charges in future. To help you we offer a free online banking service that allows you to view up to date statements and balances of your account, make transfers to other accounts and much more. For full details of this service, log on to www.halifax.co.uk.If you would like to discuss your account, you can make an appointment by visiting any branch. Alternatively you can call our telephone banking service 24 hours a day. You will find the number at the top of this letter.Yours sincerelySIG445.gifPeter JacksonManaging DirectorBanking and Savings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard, normal, expected account charges and debit interest will be prenotified to you, then 14 days later debited on your account.

 

Nonstandard, abnormal, adhoc cheque bouncing charges will be prenotified to you, then 7 days later debited on your account.

 

The chances of this being contrary to banking laws would be small.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything is automated by IT. Most banks would know by 11pm the previous night what D/Ds will be bounced in the morning.

 

That's why it shouldn't cost £39. The charge of £3 in Dublin for exactly the same thing is more realistic. Natural competition and market forces ought to bring this price down in the UK but doesn't, which is why I suggest there is a price-fixing cartel of UK banks. Proving it is a different matter.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard, normal, expected account charges and debit interest will be prenotified to you, then 14 days later debited on your account.

 

Nonstandard, abnormal, adhoc cheque bouncing charges will be prenotified to you, then 7 days later debited on your account.

 

The chances of this being contrary to banking laws would be small.

 

True but they do appear to be treating one event different to another.

 

Also remember the banks say that if you contact them BEFORE going overdrawn they might be able to arrange an overdraft in order to avoid charges.

 

Now if that manual intervention does NOT attract extra charges then why if you don't request THEIR manual intervention are you charged?

 

It can only be a form of punishment for NOT following their rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a run in with Abbey on this very point, they confirmed to me in writing that they send the DD's at a minute past midnight and any money coming on the account on the same day by way of BACS receipts and cheques clearing on that ay are not updated and processed until after 9am, therefore if they there are no cleared funds at the minute past midnight and they cannot send a DD out they will bounce it and charge for that priviledge.

 

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a run in with Abbey on this very point, they confirmed to me in writing that they send the DD's at a minute past midnight and any money coming on the account on the same day by way of BACS receipts and cheques clearing on that ay are not updated and processed until after 9am, therefore if they there are no cleared funds at the minute past midnight and they cannot send a DD out they will bounce it and charge for that priviledge.

 

Now that's interesting,Halifax sent me a letter last year stating that i could apply to have my loan taking out on the same date as my(BACS) wages went in, they also told me that all standing orders were either taking at 3am in the morning or at the end of the working.whils't direct debits may be different, it still leaves the question as to why one Bank clears BACS by 3am whilst yours states after 9am.

 

I think it could be worth you phoning the customers services at your Bank and asking them at what time someone's wages would show in an account. jst say you are thinking of opening an account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Also remember the banks say that if you contact them BEFORE going overdrawn they might be able to arrange an overdraft in order to avoid charges.

 

Now if that manual intervention does NOT attract extra charges then why if you don't request THEIR manual intervention are you charged?

 

It can only be a form of punishment for NOT following their rules

 

Manual intervention to agree an overdraft setup or increase before the event DOES incur a standard Facility Fee, as high as £100 or £50. It also involves a formal contract by post, signed and returned.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone know that a Bank knows the day BEFORE what transactions are going to occour the following day.

Anyway the case of taking 5 days to clear a cheque is a myth as I can remember in my first job at Barclays back in 1964 it was possible even then in the days of snails post to clear a cheque overnight, and this was not 'specaling' it.

So a cheque could be paid in on Monday and cleared on Tuesday and that was before computers

If You are on benefits you must read this

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that's interesting,Halifax sent me a letter last year stating that i could apply to have my loan taking out on the same date as my(BACS) wages went in, they also told me that all standing orders were either taking at 3am in the morning or at the end of the working.whils't direct debits may be different, it still leaves the question as to why one Bank clears BACS by 3am whilst yours states after 9am.

 

I think it could be worth you phoning the customers services at your Bank and asking them at what time someone's wages would show in an account. jst say you are thinking of opening an account.

 

I did phone them and that was the outcome of my conversation with them on this very point. I this very day I had cleared funds sufficient to pay any DD's and did not expect them not to go through. Abbey, did however pay me compensation for this as it caused me a great deal of embarrasment with the DD not going through and especially when I had sufficient funds on that day. What happened to the the time when you could pay cash in at the branch anytime up to closing to meet any DD or cheques being presented that day.

 

This was my experience and I caught them out, I would imagine if I looked back at my bank statements where I had been charged whether this has been happening for a long long time!

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

'What happened to the the time when you could pay cash in at the branch anytime up to closing to meet any DD or cheques being presented that day.'

Those times went away when Bankers stopped wearing bowler hats!

If You are on benefits you must read this

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

'What happened to the the time when you could pay cash in at the branch anytime up to closing to meet any DD or cheques being presented that day.'

Those times went away when Bankers stopped wearing bowler hats!

Very funny, just shows how old I am then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question about the fees being disproportionate

If the fees are for a service is there anyone who could assertain if the price for the said fees has increase inline with cpi? if it indeed is a fee for service like dentist fees, then i would have thought the increase would be yearly or bi annualy inline with cpi.

Thoughts anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, have been collecting information about this and i would like to say how i have done so far, i took copies of the tempelt letters off the internet,1st asking for my account statements, i then got these and in the mean time their had been more charges, i got my statements a couple of weeks later, i sat down and worked out what i was owed off Lloyds tsb, it was just over £630+ int why this as all been going on i opened a new account, which was a good job as i got a letter off Lloyds telling me they had closed my account, ok far enough, know i have got my statement and low and be hold its now gone up to just over £1,200 they have been charging me why my account as been closed, i got an offer from them last week offering me half, yea right i noticed what they had done doubled my account and offered me half so they get their money back, sent them a letter monday just gone and yesterday i got a cheque from Lloyds of £630 so now i am sending it back with the copy of my letter i sent on monday keep you all posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...