Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bryan Carter Help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bryan Carter has started legal proceedings against me (my fault really for ignoring their letters) and I have received court papers for a ccj regarding this. I then sent a cca letter with £1 PO to BC on 10/04/2007 requesting proof of signed agreement. BC received my letter next day 11/04/2007 but I didn't hear anything from them until yesturday 13/05/2007. They have only sent statements of my account for the debt but not the actual signed credit agreement. Can they still enforce this debt even though they have not sent the agreement to me? PLEASE HELP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanx for replying Curlyben. What do I do about the CCJ they have started against me. I let the court know I was waiting for BC to reply with the info I requested, but now they have only sent the statements, is there any way I can get the court to stop the CCJ proceedings?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm NOT a legal person and hopefully beter advice will arise shortly, but for the moment I'll have to do.

 

You need to make the court aware of what yoy have done concerning the "debt" especially the failure of BC to produce the CCA.

Also bring to the coutrts attention that BC have ceased trading as of Feb 28 and as such shouldn't be trying to enforce this debt.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for more information, are the "court" papers real, or just another attempt to scare you.

 

Can you post some of the detail on them, or even scann ?

I've put a call out for more help on this.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi both

 

my sister also has court papers from bryan carter they are real though they are from a bulk centre but she was taken to court on 9th march and already has a ccj what happens with that?

 

i have called the society of solcitors and they want copies of all the letters she has had but i am still none the wiser as to what to do about ths ccj

 

hopefully kill 2 birds with one stone here

 

good luck:)

 

ps..... i do have a scanner but i don,t know how to black out sensitive info:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court papers are real from Northampton CC Bulk Centre. I had to reply to the court to allow 28 days instead of 14 days to respond to the claim so it's all legit unfortunately. That's why I needed to know what to tell the court since BC haven't supplied the agreement. Should I ask BC again to supply the papers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone contacted Laiste? She's brilliant with info (she's a lawyer from what I understand). She was very helpful to my OH and dislikes DCAs with a passion.

 

She will be able to advise on what's the best way forward and doesn't mind people asking for help. She is very busy though so it might be a little while before she can get back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Symeon, have you asked the court about the legality of the paperwork.

 

If the claim documents are signed by Bryan Carter him after 27/02/07, maybe it's not lawful and the claim will have to be withdrawn until his position is sorted out.

 

If you have letters or whatever in your possession, signed by Bryan Carter on Bryan Carter letter-headed paper you need to send copies to the Solicitors Regulation Authority at Leamington Spa, they're very interested in what he's up to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

my thread below regarding BC&Co/NATWEST.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/42751-natwest-bank-ccj-bryan.html#linkbacks

 

READ THROUGH AND SEND THE LETTER ON THREAD 3 (FROM THUNDERPUSS).

 

I got teriffic advice from others on here and BC&Co did not get their CCJ and the case was discontinued,

 

HAPPY HUNTING,

 

SHERLOCK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Robdblynd,

 

The claim form from the court is dated 28 MAR 2007 and is signed Bryan Carter. After requesting the CCA from BC I received a letter back dated 11 May 2007 saying:

 

 

We refer to your recent letter or telephone conversation with this office.

 

Please find enclosed account documents, provided by our client, as requested.

 

We hope that this clarifies matters and look forward to hearing from you with your proposals for the discharge of this account.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

BRYAN CARTER & CO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the letters are on Bryan Carter letterheads then send copies to SRA with covering letter.

 

If the claim form says address for payment as Bryan Carter Solicitors at his office in De Havilland Drive, Weybridge then speak to someone like the court manager and get their advice. He shouldn't be asking for payment etc, nor signing County Court Summons if he's not trading.

 

That raises the issue of Fraud surely or is it false representation. Either way it's not good for him.

 

I'd also write to the original creditor and advice them that he ceased trading in that name in Feb and call into question the legality of them using a solicitor who is attempting to get money using a firm that's no longer operating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi rob

 

In my sisters case the court claim form is signed by him as "claimants solicitor" the address to send payment is his and she has 2 letters from them both in march she was taken to court in march

 

But the biggest kick in the teeth is that i cca,d them not knowing about the ccj(my sister works full time and she tends to throw letters in a draw) i got a letter back sayin....

 

"further to your recent correspondence regarding the above account

 

following your recent request for a copy of the opening agreement we can confirm your account is now closed and no fuerther mail will be sent by wescot

 

gutted :mad: seems she may be stuck with this ccj

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

i just rang the court......

 

they told me to ring bryan clark and co...........:confused:

 

i really can,t see them saying

 

oh yes sorry we are not trading no more we just thought we,d try our luck oh hum its a fair cop

 

tut phew...........

 

anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fraud act 2006, Full act here Fraud Act 2006

 

 

 

Fraud by false representation

(1) A person is in breach of this section if he-

    (a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and

    (b) intends, by making the representation-

      (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

      (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Participating in fraudulent business carried on by sole trader etc.

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he is knowingly a party to the carrying on of a business to which this section applies.

(2) This section applies to a business which is carried on-

    (a) by a person who is outside the reach of section 458 of the Companies Act 1985 (c. 6) or Article 451 of the Companies (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 (S.I. 1986/1032) (N.I. 6)) (offence of fraudulent trading), and

    (b) with intent to defraud creditors of any person or for any other fraudulent purpose.

(3) The following are within the reach of section 458 of the 1985 Act-

    (a) a company (within the meaning of that Act);

    (b) a person to whom that section applies (with or without adaptations or modifications) as if the person were a company;

    © a person exempted from the application of that section.

(4) The following are within the reach of Article 451 of the 1986 Order-

    (a) a company (within the meaning of that Order);

    (b) a person to whom that Article applies (with or without adaptations or modifications) as if the person were a company;

    © a person exempted from the application of that Article.

(5) "Fraudulent purpose" has the same meaning as in section 458 of the 1985 Act or Article 451 of the 1986 Order.

(6) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable-

    (a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);

    (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).

(7) Subsection (6)(a) applies in relation to Northern Ireland as if the reference to 12 months were a reference to 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the letters are on Bryan Carter letterheads then send copies to SRA with covering letter.

 

If the claim form says address for payment as Bryan Carter Solicitors at his office in De Havilland Drive, Weybridge then speak to someone like the court manager and get their advice. He shouldn't be asking for payment etc, nor signing County Court Summons if he's not trading.

 

 

Hi again Robdblynd, sorry new to this :) . Who is SRA? The letters are on BC letterheads and the claim form says exactly what you wrote so it looks like I'll have to get some advice. Thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Symeon, the SRA is

 

Solicitors Regulation Authority,

Victoria Court,

8 Dormer Place,

Leamington Spa,

Warwickshire.

CV32 5AE.

 

They're looking into the activity of Mr Carter and have received several lots of info from CAGgers about this chap.

 

Why not ring a solicitor, they often give free advice over the phone if it takes no more than a few minutes. Just outline what you have about him and that the forms etc are signed by him (with the dates) and you'll get the info you need to take you forward.

 

Good luck and keep us posted. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...