Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mr and Mrs JCJazzy Vs CB


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, Posted this on CB forum,but was advised to post here also.We are about to send off SAR to CB.We suspect charges will be in region of £5,000.We know multiple claims in Scotland for the same account are now risky,and we couldn't possibly afford any charges if we had to pay bank costs by using the summary cause route.Basically we are getting confused about the way to go with a large case vs CB.One kind poster in other section said its best to send initial letter asking for costs,and then report to FOS once 8 weeks are up.If we are then unsuccessful with the FOS route we can then go down the legal route.Is this the best way to tackle the CB in Scotland given the costs we are talking about?Any advice gratefully appreciated.JC jazzy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jc jazzy and yes claiming in Scotland especially from CB can prove difficult, continue with the prelim and the lba, as soon as the 8 weeks are up from when they received the prelim or you have an offer from them (whichever is quickest) then start your complaint to the FOS.

The FOS have a 100% track record with these complaints and as you know it avoids any risks associated with courts, you can also claim for interest and the bank are charged for the complaint.

The alternative you have is using MCOL if you can use an english address the only thing you need to consider about this action is in the event of a court appearance you would need to travel there.

If you were unhappy with the FOS findings then you could continue to court.

 

Hope this helps

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, Well finally posted our SAR request today.Feel a wee bit apprehensive about the consequences of such behaviour,but we're fed up with their behaviour and the costs this has had on us as a family the last few years.Let battle commence!! (That sounds braver than we actually feel !!)JCJazzy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Bigmac, Thanks for the interest.We've had absolutely no communication from CB bank as yet.We do know they've cashed the cheque,which is fortunate because we cannot seem to trace through the recorded delivery route! Good old Royal Mail eh?Intend to stick to the timescales though.Cannot wait to see how much it all adds up to,which is ironic given we used to throw statements out as soon as poss ,as it reminded us what a mess we were in.We suspect it will add up to a tidy wee sum! Thanks for the moral support,JCx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, No communication received as yet.Intend to send a further letter soon,and complain to Information Commisioner.Feeling quite frustrated about lack of progress as we do not want to claim until we know the figures we're dealing with .What does everyone else do to deal with this? JC Jazzy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bigmac is right. There is an interesting post on the Halifax forum by Dusary who is in a similar situation and has written to the information commissioner. I think help can be found there.

 

I'm still waiting for some myself and it is frustrating but everything will be fine.

 

Good Luck!!:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, Can anyone who has been successful with CB advise how long it took from SAR request to completion using the FOS? Many Thanks,JC x

PS the reason I ask is preliminary addition on statements we do still have (about half) add up to 7K without interest! Suspect they might be slightly concerned!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no quick route to get this money back and this is mainly due to CB. They are hanging on as long as they can and the only thing that you can do is to be one step ahead of the game so as to waste no time.

At the moment there isnt an amount of settled cases dealt through the FOS to give you an average timescale but i must also add that court isnt a speedy process either and as you know court action is not an option with the amount you are claiming back so the FOS is the route to follow.

My case is with the FOS and i am also claiming from the CB but it is a little more complicated than most and they have had it 4 months now.

We hope to provide more information on how claims are dealt with from start to finish when the FOS deal with them but to do this we need a few to be finished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, Have posted on CB links but never got a response.Finally got our statements, after too many days to remember.Have a couple of queries though,which I'd appreciate some help with:

Statements are from January 2001- can we claim from this date? (initial letter sent in May 2007)

Can we claim for SC charges?

and Arrangement fees?(Don't know what for I presume unauthorised overdraft)

Would appreciate some help before we write letter asking for charges so any advice would be helpful.

JCJazzy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. As I haven't had a response I've done a search and I think service charges are reclaimable.Can anyone answer my query re timescales and arrangement fees? I would be very grateful as want to have correct info before I request refunds.Could anyone please advise?????????????????????? JC Jazzy

Has the site gone a bit quiet or is it just me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jcjazzy

 

I think if it is an arrangement fee for organising an overdraft for you, you cannot claim as it is seen as a service charge ie they are charging for a service they are providing. As regards unauthorised overdraft charges, bounced dds, so's etc., Yes you can claim.

 

You will find all the information you need in the templates library as regards timescales etc., The first one gives 14 days, as does the second and then its off to court or is it the FOS you are using. If it is the latter then I am sorry I cannot help you there as I have never used them. I think somebody said before that there is no definite timescales as it is a rather lengthy process. I would just get things ready for now and send the first letter. If they send you a "go away" letter then send them the second which is a letter before action. If you hear nothing its off down the route of the FOS if thats the way you are choosing to go.

 

Good luck

Please keep us posted on your progress.

 

Kind regards

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi jcjazzy been away for a 2/3 weeks there as gemspan says above arrangement fees cant be reclaimed, i remember your route through the FOS was due to the amount you were to claim but are you aware of the small claims amount being lifted from 750 to 3000 Jan 08.

Keep me updated of your progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Bigmac, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.We've been on holiday,and lots of other stuff has been going on.We did hear about the small claims amount being increased but our claim is for a lot more than that.Our claim has been acknowledged by the CB,but nothing else has been happening.Keep us posted on your progress too.JCJazzy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI Bigmac, Sorry for the delay again.Haven't been on the site so much these days.The bank did say it would be dealt with after the case,and we also contacted the FOS several times.The CBs took their time to respond despite this and we only received 6 years info.JCJazzy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, Can anyone advise what the up-to-date picture is?Some points in main forum suggest people may need to contact the banks again or their claims are dropped.Our claim is currently lodged with bank and the FOS.We're not sure if we should be doing anything else in the interim.Any advice would be much appreciated.JC Jazzy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...