Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

In the Red v Abbey. ***WON!!!***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I have recently been charged a total of £415 by Abbey for making Direct debit payments, and paying Debit card transactions whilst I was over my overdraft limit, will I still be able to make a claim even though the bank has made the payments for me when the money wasn't in the account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry, I haven't explained myself very well there, I am not totally irresponsible with my debit cards, but I thought that if there wasn't enough funds in my account the card would be rejected at point of sale, so when I got my Jauary/February statement I was really shocked to see each transaction, eg, shopping and petrol was listed as being paid whilst being over my overdraft.

what really cheesed me off, is that when the charges were applied to my account, I was then short of funds for two more DD's so I expect another £60 in charges to come for those aswell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not alone to be a victims of this action.

Abbey have paid 5 or six of my d/debits and other payments (including one with instructions passed by telephone when I could have been told by the person at the end of the line that there were no funds !!) and charged me £30 for each transation.

What is irritating is that the transactions were mostly b/ween £6.00 or £12.00 each so the mark up is...huuuuuge for Abbey.

Why should they tell customers they have no clear funds in their account when they can make this sort of profit on the back of it !!

 

Can these fees be challenged ?

 

Regards

NINO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome both of you! Looks to me like a good rummage round the FAQs will benefit you both. I'd also recommend that, after reading the FAQs, any posts should be run as 2 separate threads as dealing with two people's concerns in one thread gets very confusing!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone, I am about to start preparing my case to reclaim my charges from the Abbey, I have been looking back over my statements(I still have them from March 2001, anorak or what), on some of them I have a small charge for 'interest whist overdrawn', I have an overdraft, do I include this in my total claim or do I ignore these?

 

Have to say I am very nervous about doing this but feel it has to be done, I am not the sharpest tool in the box and fear being tied in knots by all the legalities.

Thanks anyway. :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is standard overdraft interest and not related to charges then you ignore it. That is an agreed rate for borrowing their money. not a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis that some kind of charge might be reasonable, you probably shouldn't include that. merely interest on charges. consumer forums

consumerforums

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I'm finally going to take on Abbey to reclaim the charges that have been applied to my account over the years, but who do I ask for regarding a record of all my charges over the last five years, is it to my local branch manager or is it to the Abbey head office,if it is the head office is there an adress for them.

thanks ever so much in anticipation of your help,

 

I.T.R

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm finally going to take on Abbey to reclaim the charges that have been applied to my account over the years, but who do I ask for regarding a record of all my charges over the last five years, is it to my local branch manager or is it to the Abbey head office,if it is the head office is there an adress for them.

thanks ever so much in anticipation of your help,

 

I.T.R

 

There is nothing to lose by asking your branch but experience tells us thats not the best way with this bank.

Have a look in the bank forums and look at Abbey thread then go to contacts......this will give you the info.

 

Take some time to read the faqs too.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Red

 

Its up to you really. What is the value of your claim?

 

If its only a few quid over £5K you can still apply to the court and request its dealt with in the SCC.

 

If its significantly over £5K then it might be best to consider what options you have.

 

Perhaps post a precise of the claim so far and people can give you a view.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help mate, not recieved my details yet but i was seriously ill five years back and got into terrible financial difficulty after being off work for ten months and paid a hell of a lot of chages during this time and subsequently because of taking long periods off work since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone, sent my SAR off on the 4th October, recieved a reply on Friday(20th) stating that they are unable to supply a list of charges applied to my account for the past six years because 'we do not store this information seperately from other transaction data but we can supply a list of transactions which include any charges applied'.

It goes on to say that arrangements have been made to send me the past fourteen months of transactions in the form of duplicate statements however most transactional info between 2000 and 2005 has been archived to microfiche and is not available on our computer system.

 

I have however, found nearly all my bank statements after a major clean up of my cupboards at home so Ive two questions here....

 

1. Am I in a stronger position now if abbey say that they have no records of charges from 2000 to 2005 but I have got the info on the statements I have found?

ie. they cant really dispute the amount of charges applied to my account.

 

2 Should I still reply, and demand copies of my account statements as planned, or get straight to the nitty gtritty of working out the total of charges applied and get the premliminary letter sent out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Red,

It would also be a worthwhile exercise of progressing through obtaining the data from their magical `microfiche` system, and compare the data against what you have on your statements as a number of people are receiving their microfiche data and finding them free of charges (or sometimes a lot less charges than expected) so if there was evidence to this effect it would be quite powerful!

 

Comments made are only my opinin, but if you find them helpful Please click my scales.

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, sent off my SAR letter on 6th october, have recieved a reply stating that they will send me the past fourteen months worth of statements blah blah, and said it is not possible to provide me with a computer printout of transactions before that, but they can send me a list of 'archived transactions' between 2000 and 2005 under seperate cover.

Is this the info I need or do I send the letter about complaining to the data information commissioner.

Hope you can help, cheers, In the Red.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome ITR, yes this is the information that you require, the archive is the microfiched statements that we have so much fun getting LOL

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...