Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

12yrs Claimed.6yrs Paid.


sybil
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have issued Court Claim for 12 yrs charges,mortgage arrears fees only, acknowledged and defence filed.did not claim 8% interest as this would have taken it over £5000 small claims court limit.

Rec'd letter and cheque to cover 6 years charges.Shall i accept this as part payment and let it go to court, or settle for 6 years but ask for 8% as full and final settlement ?

Any ideas out there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Accept this as part payment and continue for the remainder. Inform the court you have recieved £XX from the Defendant, but the case will continue for the rest.

Send the accept as part payment letter to the Defendants.

I think you can tell the court you made a mistake when completing the N1 and that you did not apply for the statutory 8% interest, however I think the courts will see it for what it was, your way of keeping it in small claims, but its worth the try!

If it was me i would accept as part payment, continuing with the claim without the 8%.

Hope this helps

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sybil - well done on progress so far - may I ask who your mortgage was with?

 

Also - have a read round on the Limitations Act - there is lots of info about. (sorry if I'm teaching grandmother how to suck eggs:) ).

 

Best of Luck - keep going - Jackie

Abbey: Settled - now for no. 2

Dudley Building Society : claim dismissed - no costs

London Scottish: settled in full :oops:

Capital One - settled in full :p

 

"Energy and persistence conquer all things" Benjamin Franklin

 

Any advice, information and thoughts given by me are just my humble opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

mrs Foot,

Many thanks for your input, was kind of thinking along the lines you have suggested, got their cheque for 6 yrs charges so they are on the back foot anyway, although they do the blah blah about 'not regarded as an admission of liability' etc. Have banked the cheque, so nice to get something back, but i don't want to let them off the hook easy, its like they are buying us off on the cheap.There is another £1000 involved to go back 12 yrs total. So far i am letting them off by not claiming the interest.Hoped to do that later as a separate court action after i'd got back all charges,to keep it Small Claims Court.

Have spent days looking through forum/post etc and thought i gotta post this and get some advice about this particular situation.

Have only got this far thanks to CAG and a member who has pm'd me with help,over the last couple of months.

THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO REPLY, iT FEELS LONELY OUT HERE SOMETIMES DON'T IT !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jackie,

I have just learnt everything from this forum, from the posts, the stickys, the whole thing, i don't know a lot just still learning. Only got this far from swotting up and help from a member.Grateful for any advice. Have followed all advice and got this far. Want to post "WON" at sometime with all details !

Mortgage was with Alliance & Leicester,paid off last year after 30 yrs.( You will deduce from the time span that i am a grandmother but am still on a learning curve ) you never stop.

All charges were just late payments. Not ERC,Not bounced D/D's.Just late !! £50 per month for 2 letters per month, Over 12 yrs off and on.

Have read thread about limitations act but am still a bit confused, hence my request for advice.

THANK YOU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sybil - there is something different about mortgages (than bank charges) in that if the arrears payments etc were paid back as part of the capital of the mortgage - then you have 12 years anyway. Keep reading round (and so will I - I've read it somewhere on here) - I'm sure you'll get that "WON" bit next to your title very soon.

 

There are also a couple of threads in "GENERAL" about the limitations act re: concealment of facts. I'll look later and post again - I'm currently using this with my second claim against Abbey.

 

Best of Luck

Jackie

Abbey: Settled - now for no. 2

Dudley Building Society : claim dismissed - no costs

London Scottish: settled in full :oops:

Capital One - settled in full :p

 

"Energy and persistence conquer all things" Benjamin Franklin

 

Any advice, information and thoughts given by me are just my humble opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jackie,

I remember you, i followed you Dudley Building Soc. claim. Sorry you did'nt win.I really thought you would. It makes me wary of pushing on further with this, though i think the circumstances are a bit different.

I have also been following the A & L Bank Forum posts, they get the same letters, same defence, same tactics as with the Mortgage claims.

I have read somewhere about claiming 12 years, but i can't find it anymore. Have also looked for Limitation Act, but have not found anything re that yet.

This part is getting a bit complicated really need some help with it.

Thanks so much for your input.

Sybil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sybil,

 

If your charges were added to the amount owed on the mortgage you can go back 12 years under s.12 of the Limitation Act 1980.

 

If you paid the charges as they fell due then you are limited to the normal 6yrs and would need to raise s.32 of the Limitation Act either on the ground that they deliberately concealed a fact relevant to the cause of action or that you paid the charges under a mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See Sybil - I knew someone who knew just the right words would answer:D . The only reason that I lost with the dudley was because they charged £10 in 2000 - if they had provided their breakdown of costs earlier - I would not have pursued this. They listed £12.47 as the cost to them of my direct debit bouncing. This was assuming that someone put a letter in an envelope and took it down to the post office themselves and put a stamp on!!! I questioned this but they swore that they still did this. However, this would not, I don't believe, apply to a larger organisation - so if it costs the Dudley £12.47 - what does it costs a larger org. - much less I believe.

 

Jackie

Abbey: Settled - now for no. 2

Dudley Building Society : claim dismissed - no costs

London Scottish: settled in full :oops:

Capital One - settled in full :p

 

"Energy and persistence conquer all things" Benjamin Franklin

 

Any advice, information and thoughts given by me are just my humble opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Zoot for your help with this. The arrears fee charges were added to the sum outstanding, we never paid them extra when we sent the monthly payments. In their defence which they filed they quote "section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980, charges incurred by the Claimant prior to 2001 did not arise within six years before action was commenced and are statute barred." From your post i believe they are wrong and can claim back 12yrs under s 12 of the Same Act.

Am sending them a letter stating i will accept the 6 years payment that they sent as part payment but not as a full and final settlement and will continue with the court action until the balance payment of the claim is received.

Shall notify the County court tomorrow of payment and take a copy of their letter and my reply.

As its small claims court, ive paid the fee, got a part payment there is nothing to lose is there ???? COMMENTS PLEASE.

Are they hoping we will just cave in when we get something back ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...