Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would have thought so but I'm no lawyer. What did the one that you spoke to say? You could also google about how/when a will trust is set up to get more of an idea before you speak to the original lawyer. HB
    • While I am waiting for the original solicitor to ring back about the will can I ask. After my dad passed they were informed about this an released a copy of the will to me and my brother, should they have set the trust up then as they were informed of his passing?   Thanks again
    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind ..  for a little while ...
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

argos claim


fkelanne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya all, i sent the letter to get my charges back 2 weeks ago from argos for £145. Today i got a letter from them saying

"As stated in your letter, the OFT issued a statement following its review of eight credid card provider. The OFTs statement sets out its view of the principle credit card issuers not store cards issuers should follow in stting default charges. As a store card provider we have not been involved in the discussions between the credit card companies and the OFT.

 

In managing your account, you have failed to make payments, or the correct payment as they fell due on a number of occasions resulting to £145 in charges. As part of having an argos card, you are responsible for making the required payments on time and we have the right to recover from you the cost incurred by us dealing with you default if youfail to make a payment whenit falls due. Had we charged the £12 fee referred to in the OFTs report on credit cards the difference in your fees would be £41 in total.

 

We value our reationship with our customers and always endeavour to resolve queries and complaints as positively as possible. Having reviewed yuor account, for the reasons stated abvove, we are unable to offer you a refund of fees however as a goodwill gesture we are prepared to offer you £70 to be credited to you account(i owe £100) our offer is made without admission of liability and full settlement of all claims you may have against us in relation to the default fees on your account.

 

What should i do? i need it paying off as soon as pos as im on buying a house and dont what any debts when i move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT stuff is irrelevant since the OFT didn't give ayone the right to break the law. The certainly didn't give anyone the right to charge £12 - that was an absolute maximum that could be justified only in exceptional circumstances. generally they expected charges to be significantly less. The law is clear: these charges are unlawful.

 

Accept their offer as a partial settlement only and send them an LBA for the total amount.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up until recently I worked in Home Retail Group and when I found out about CAG I asked one of the financial services team whether we were getting requests for money back. I was told that yes we were but we were making people jump through hoops to get their refunds first. so just follow the given procedures from the rest of the site and you will get your money back.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there - do you have an email address for Argos card people? I've sent them letters but they won't reply to me... wanted to give them a little nudge in writing to see if that works...

 

Thanks in hope

 

GG

Capital One: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 14 Nov 06, Prelim 8 Dec 06, LBA 10 Jan 07, MCOL 1 Mar 07. Settled in full 2 Apr 07. :)

HSBC: Prelim 27 Feb 07, LBA 10 Apr 2007, Received offer 25 Apr 07. Rejected 2nd May 07. Received new offer 22 May 2007. Accepted 22 May 2007. Settled.

Barclaycard: SAR 2nd May 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there - do you have an email address for Argos card people? I've sent them letters but they won't reply to me... wanted to give them a little nudge in writing to see if that works...

 

Thanks in hope

 

GG

 

Which letters have you sent?

 

If they haven't replied to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - sent them the Data Protection Act non-compliance letter. If they don't reply to that - take them to court under the DPA.

 

If they haven't replied to Prelim letter, send LBA and then sue them in the County Court.

 

You set the timescale - sooner or later they will have to respond even if its when a court summons apears on the mat.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent the lba on tuesday, got a reply 2day offering me £92.05 to clear my account, what do i do now? should i accept?

 

What you originally requested was £145 but you owed them £100 so you were effectively asking for your debt to be wiped off and £45.

 

So, if they are offering your debt of £100 is written off and you get £92.05 - then that's more than you asked for and I think you should accept.

 

If they mean they will give you £92.05 against your debt of £100 then that's a long way short of what you requested and I think you should carry on for the rest.

 

This is my opinion but it's up to you.

 

Steven

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...