Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

surfman v lloyds tsb £9000 claim


surfman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks for the posts surfman, I was getting a tiny bit interested as Barclays are a week late with their AQ for my case as of yesterday

 

I'm a bit less excited now after seeing how much time they were given in your case, but still, there's hope

 

and well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done surfman, it's a shame they don't forget to submit the AQ for everyone. But I am so glad they have for you.:)

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Surfman, hope this is the end for you. I should have won by default this week, but SC&M have sneakily put an 'ex party application' in (still outside deadlines!), for re-allocation to fast track as my case is also a larger sum. So I knew nothing about them doing this, and the judge awarded it, although I've been given time to object. This is after a first disclosure order that I had already, so not a happy bunny.

 

Glad you getting yours though - enjoy when you get it!

 

BW,

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i am not going to crack open the bubbly yet i know what these lot are like so i am hoping they just get it over with and pay up but as it is quite a large sum of money i am expecting them to not play ball .

 

i have not heard from the court yet and have never had any coraspondance from sc&m

 

but fingers crossed, i will keep you all informed and good luck to you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BW, poor you. they are a sneaky kettle of fish ain't they.

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have rang the court today and judgement has been issued and the relevant documents sent in post today, so tomorrow they should receive them.

as far as i know it will give them 14 days to pay up but i am not too sure so i will have to wait and read them when they arrive.

bloke I spoke to in the court said if i have trouble or further questions i can talk to the courts balifs.

 

think i will also sent them a little reminder letter when i receive my copy of the paperwork

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfman,

 

Just another sneaky thing of lloyds, Christinajanep went to collect her judgement from court last week (same time as I should have got mine), and Lloyds had managed to get a stay in somehow, so they wouldn't let her collect judgement. We are both appealing, my N244 went in yesterday with massive help from Gary, and I've just got to wait now, but the court were ace, no £35 charge and they say hopefully 5 day turnaround, so I'm gonna phone them friday.

 

All I say is keep phoning the court, and I wouldn't necessarily phone SC&M to remind them, in case they choose the other route and go back to the court!!

 

Pen - BW was Best wishes, I wondered who you were talking to, not sure if my signature thing working, sorry. It's fzrkitten anyway.

 

x

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

fzrkitten good luck with your appeal hope the court come up with the correct decission and chucks the stay out, surely by now the courts should know it is only a delaying tactic,

 

I have not received judgement today they prob sent it 2nd class, but the bloke said it would be in yesterday afternoons post ,so another day waiting, unless sc&m got a sneaky stay in yesterday afternoon but i doubt it.

 

i am surprised that they have been so lame with defending my case as it is near £9000 I can see them rolling over and paying out sums of a few hundred quid but i thought they would fight to the bitter end with this one.

 

maybe they know i have a watertight case, or they just got slack with there paperwork, maybe they just dont give a toss, who knows

 

but they are certainly getting a 110% fight from me untill i have my money and my account has been closed.

 

i will leave all contact with the sc&m until i have judgement then hit em with the 14 days to pay or the baliffs will be sent in letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Mine too is for over £8000, but I have seen some people be paid before even getting to court, for similar sums, so I don't know where they are coming from I'm sure!

 

My appeal is to set aside re-allocation to fast track, not a stay (not yet anyway) - Lloyds got their order granted for the allocation to fast track, even though they were out of time as usual. GaryH helped me to oppose it, but if they win the re-allocation, I guess then they'll put in for the stay. If I win, hopefully it will be an end to it. Longest 5 days ever this is!

 

I hope you get something good in the post soon.

 

BW, Fzrkitten.

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah i get ya, i thought you had a stay put against your case even after judgement made.

 

In my allocation questionare i have chosen fast track, i was not aware that i should choose small claims as the amount was over £5000.

I thought it was the norm to pick fast track for over this amount was i wrong?

 

but as the court has said i have been awarded judgement suppose it does not make a differance now to my claim.

I take it lloyds can do nothing now as judgement has been made as far as there oft case is concerned, i assume it is to late for them to apply for a stay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Well, Christinajanep got judgement, but then received a stay as well, but then got paid into her account on friday. Cuckoo springs to mind!

 

I did MCOL, a good few months ago now, and I didn't really know about splitting claims or keeping it under £5k, I hadn't found this site until around that time. I just put small claims and got it, and it had stayed like that right up until last week, when Lloyds applied with an 'ex party application', meaning not telling me - that they wanted it re-allocated, even though they had defaulted anyway. I was on hol so didn't get my judgement in, but it would have crossed with them anyway I think.

 

Plus the claim is only around £6k without the interest and charges etc, so it was only just over the small claims threshold.

 

I'd say just keep checking your account if it's still open, or go straight back to the court on the 14th day deadline afternoon if you don't get paid.

 

I might have said that last sentence before, sorry if I have, losing it now!

 

BW, Fzrkitten.

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

your right not to have split the claim, small claims is better as your not open to costs if you loose the claim,

there are some links earlier in my thread to the differance, i am not entirely sure i have just gone through it step by step in a bumbling daze, a lot of this stuff baffles me at first and it's not untill the stage has passed then I understand the process,

I will keep checking bank every day, hope this judgement letter turns up tomorrow.

ps, fzf, nice bike.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can both dream eh? Unfortunately I can't even afford my insurance at mo, well peeved. Mortgage and bills piling up, mainly down to bank charges, desperately need this to be over soon, and in a good way!

 

Guess I might make an allowance for some LED indicators, and an undertray...........

 

Sigh!

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

got my judgement letter today says,

 

you must pay the claimant a total of £8,842.16 forthwith

 

woo hoo happy days pay up pronto in other words,

nothing in bank yet but will keep checking and write then a reminder letter i have seen on garyt thread.

 

any moderators looking please add to my title **won defence struck out**

 

looking forward to a extra payday this month

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! thought id av a peek at ur story. Nice 1! nice shoppin spree in order for you then i hope!

 

Im gonna go the court 2moro and get in the application for judgement. Hope it doesnt take ages to get the money.

 

Let us no wen u hear n e thin.

 

Spk 2 ya soon!

 

Steph

NatWest - £3702.94 - Won.. Done and Dusted!!

Lloyds - £771.52 - Nearly there...

 

The Daily Mirror, GMTV, Granada Reports........

Hollywood Next!

 

Check out how I re-claimed my unlawfull bank charges:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/4797-stephanie-NatWest-i-i.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...