Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Justice66 vs First Direct


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

claim for default charges for unauthorised

overdrafts/direct debits over past 6

years.I do not believe these charges

reflect the true cost to first direct.i

have been unlawfully deprived of this money

and request to be repaid in full.The

charges applied each month were more than

my overdraft

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

This sounds like an abreviated POC.

 

Please post what your trying to say, as this doesn't really make any sense

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the

Claim no.

Warrant no.

Claimant

Defendant(s)

(If applicable)

(including ref.)

N244 Application Notice (4.00)

The court office at

is open from 10am to 4pm Monday to Friday. When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number.

(including ref.)

Application Notice

Note You must complete Parts A and B, and Part C if applicable. Send any relevant fee and the completed application

to the court with any draft order, witness statement or other evidence; and sufficient copies for service on each

respondent.

You should provide this information for listing the application

Part A

I (We)(1) (on behalf of)(the claimant)(the defendant)

intend to apply for an order ( a draft of which is attached) that(2)

because(3)

Part B

I (We) wish to rely on: tick one box

the attached (witness statement)(affidavit) my statement of case

1. Enter your

full name, or

name of

solicitor

2. State clearly

what order you

are seeking and

if possible

attach a draft

3. Briefly set

out why you

are seeking the

order. Include

the material

facts on which

you rely,

identifying

any rule or

statutory

provision

Address to which documents about this claim should be sent (including reference if appropriate)(4)

if applicable

fax no.

DX no.

Postcode e-mail

4. If you are

not already a

party to the

proceedings,

you must

provide an

address for

service of

documents

Signed Position or

office held

(Applicant)(’s Solicitor)(’s litigation friend)

Date

(if signing on

behalf of firm or company)

evidence in Part C in support of my application

Tel. no.

Printed on behalf of The Court Service

1. How do you wish to have your application dealt with

a) at a hearing?

b) at a telephone conference?

c) without a hearing?

} complete all questions below

complete Qs 5 and 6 below

2. Give a time estimate for the hearing/conference

(hours) (mins)

3. Is this agreed by all parties? Yes No

4. Give dates of any trial period or fixed trial date

5. Level of judge

6. Parties to be served

Darren Doughty

Click here to clear all fields

Part C

I (We) wish to rely on the following evidence in support of this application:

Signed Position or

office held

(Applicant)(’s Solicitor)(’s litigation friend)

Date

(if signing on behalf

of firm or company)

Statement of Truth

*(I believe) *(The applicant believes) that the facts stated in Part C are true

Claim No.

*delete as appropriate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...