Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have you asked for advice from your students union people? HB
    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

broke dave v LTSB ****WON!!!****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dave,

 

Have a look at the internet archive wayback machine. I have printed off T&C's in relation to charges from the old Lloyds TSB sites. It doesn't say that the charges are for breaking an agreement though, just that its a fee for providing a service.

 

I haven't got the link to it mate, sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry to everyone that I haven't been around for a bit to offer support.

Had what I thought to be some good news after the bad news referred to above.

Have now added a new contract which means I am now working 5 to 6 days per week. Told Business Manager and asked for unauthorised O/D of £2000 to be made an authorised one to avoid further charges.

After 2 hours on phine this was declined. May now lose the house this month :eek:

Have other info that he gave me about charges but am too tired and frustrated to share them now.

Will update in the morning.

Good night and God bless all of you facing the same challenges.

p.s. no holidays planned here just keeping a roof over my head :(

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.."Told Business Manager and asked for unauthorised O/D of £2000 to be made an authorised one to avoid further charges.

After 2 hours on phine this was declined".

 

Just compare & contrast the caring face that the banks put across in their tv ads (note how LTSB use cartoon characters to portray their customers now) with the actuallity as shown above; They never cease to amaze me.

 

All the very best Dave, go get YOUR money back & give those avaricious (edit) a good kicking whilst your at it.

 

Keep your chin up. Good night & God Bless

 

McIavelli (I'm not that devious really)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update. Nothing from **** following 2 nudge letters. So it looks like this is going all the way :( . Putting bundle together today, but still can't find T&Cs. However, I have found a couple of O/D letters which on the back have 'Our Guide to Banking Charges' explained. Does anyone know if this will be sufficient. It is after all indicative of the T&Cs which were in force at the time.

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and another thing! Why have I always got a guest viewing my thread? As the last post was 4 days ago I am well down the list. Getting paranoid;)

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are still settling and not turning up for hearings unless you are claiming CI or pre 6 years years charges.

 

I have searched around and cannot find T&C for the period you require.

 

I cannot find T&Cs on the Internet Archive Wayback link here (you have a try maybe I am missing something: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/82148-got-court-date-important.html#post732094

 

I would expect T&Cs to look like that in post 48 above.

 

I would use that in post 48 above if you can find nothing more suitable. If Lloyds then contend that the T&Cs are incorrect then it will be for them to adduce evidence in the form of the correct ones.

 

About the guest, someone has probably left their computer on open on your thread. Even the slowest reader would not take 4 days to read 55 posts.

 

If I stumble across any I will post you a link to them.

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support G. I couldn't find them on that link either - maybe we have both gone mad :p . Probably will use those on link 48, together with the wording on the back of the 2 letters I have found.

Hoped it wouldn't go this far but let battle commence. Hope the local judge is freindly!

Sorry, can't click on your scales as I need to spread my reputations around :D

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have decided to include this in my bundle

 

BBC NEWS | Business | Judge slams bank payout delays

 

Any thoughts anyone?

 

Also, having read on another thread (can't remember where) about courts not requiring full documents (as they see them every day!!), would the following be acceptable?

 

I, BD as the claimant will rely on the following documents as a state of fact as supporting my claim:

 

Then put in the headings of the basic court bundle; giving links to the documents in case **** can't find them.

 

You then only need to put in documents that are personal to you. This saves both the claiment and the court a lot of time.

 

Just a thought before I run out of money and ink :p

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Broke dave

 

Thank you for your message.. im sure it will , just sit tight - will watch your thread to see how your getting on .

 

Good Luck

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have decided to include this in my bundle

 

BBC NEWS | Business | Judge slams bank payout delays

 

Any thoughts anyone?

 

Also, having read on another thread (can't remember where) about courts not requiring full documents (as they see them every day!!), would the following be acceptable?

 

I, BD as the claimant will rely on the following documents as a state of fact as supporting my claim:

 

Then put in the headings of the basic court bundle; giving links to the documents in case **** can't find them.

 

You then only need to put in documents that are personal to you. This saves both the claimant and the court a lot of time.

 

Just a thought before I run out of money and ink :p

 

You must file your own bundle in full. If I have not done so already I can send you most of the core documents in one PDF (if you PM me your email address).

 

Where specifically did you see the thread saying no need to file your own complete bundle? This is a dangerous activity and I would only embark on such a course if a judge specifically directed it and even then I would be reluctant - I would not want to rely on a bundle prepared by someone else; I have seen some flakey claimant's lately (not referring to you of course BD).

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/98848-court-bundle-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Don't worry I think I have everything I need for Court?

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BD - have been reading through your whole thread. Thought you may be able to help me with regard to Notice of Transfer of Proceedings which I have received. It says that the claim has been transferred to my local County Court of Winchester. It also says that "the filing of an allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case unless the Districtrs otherwise Judge at the court of transfer order"; and

"Note: Any party affected by this Order may under Rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed. Such a party must apply under Rule 23.3 within 14 days of service of this order". What does this mean?

The defence was then a 9 pointer which I gather is standard. I've posted it on my thread.

I realise how busy you must be at the stage you're at, but as our claims seem to be going along a similar route, I just wanted to ask whether I should be doing anything now. A mediation leaflet arrived with the Notice of Transfer of Proceedings.

I would be so grateful if you could help me and I'm sorry you've been having such a time of it recently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, but have just read on someone else's thread (LisaM696969) that she sent a draft order for directions following her Notice of Transfer of Proceedings but before getting a court date. She copied this to SC&M as well as sending to local county court and Lloyds have now settled. Would it be worth sending this and if so, where do I find a template or information for the draft order for directions.

Would be very grateful for your help, will paste this onto my own thread too!!

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot find your thread.

 

The draft order and settling by Lloyds are likely to be co-incidence. Lloyds settle in their own time, unless they have judgement. However you should still send it.

 

Read the link in my post 65 above, it includes a link to the draft order. It would be helpful if you read the links in previous posts before posting up a question that has already been answered - it cuts down on all our typing.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found your thread now, I see BD started your thread. You should stick to it. I have copied post 67 to your thread too.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just read your whole thread - sorry to hear you have been having a difficult time of it . Try not to get to stressed with it all - they will settle eventually.

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks GuidoT and BfC. Haven't had time recently to help anyone. Tina, I hope that your questions have been answered. Nothing for you to worry about.

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court Bundle almost ready but I am waiting until the last minute. Have printed a lot of stuff out but not any T&Cs or Witness Statement (yet). I've seen today that CAG are preparing a new statement for those who have court dates imminent. Have PMed GaryH but if any other MODS see this please help. Ideally I need to print and photocopy everything over the weekend and lodge at court Monday. Then send to **** next day delivery. Court date is 10/07/07 :cool:

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any ideas on the new Witness Statement anyone?

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone has PM'd me over the last 24 hours please try again as my e-mail address has changed (couldn't pay for the other one!!!)

Gary H I really need your help with the new statement if it is ready. Monday is cut off time.

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PM me again if they haven't settled with 3 days to go. You almost certainly won't need it.

 

Referencing specific T&C's to the WS and tayloring each to particular accounts is labour intensive as you can imagine. I've got my hands full with the Birmingham cases at the moment.

 

In the Small claims track late amendments or additions to evidence are permitted so it won't be a problem to add it nearer the time if necessary.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have court date 23rd July ? I think this is for allocation, do I need to take any paperwork or money to pay any fees?

I thought they would have paid up by now. I have received 750 of my claim for 2025

Can anyone help me please?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...