Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest in breach of CCA 1974 what now?


ripoffstopper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:confused: HELP PLEASE.......

 

NatWest are in breach of a CCA 1974 Section 77/78 request. They have written to me saying that they cannot provide a properly executed copy of my credit card agreement. However they have passed the debt to Triton Credit Services who have written to me about settlement.

 

Am I right in thinking that whilst they are in breach of a CCA request they cannot pass the debt to DCA? Coincidentally Capital One have just done the same - different DCA though - no copy of card agreement but pursuing the debt.

 

Any advice will be gratefully received, Cheers ROS :confused:

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

from what ive read on here,if they are in default they are not supposed to try to obtain payment on it or issue u a default while they themselves are in default,as it becomes nulled.id contact the credit agencies.also they arent supposed to get a DCA involved either.i asked mine to pass the debt back to the originator as they are now in default due to no CCA they are in default.most DCA's will oblige but some are really stubborn!

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ripoffstopper,

 

Don't panic yet!

Triton Credit Services are the in-house collection department for the RBS group. I would imagine that their intention was to scare you harass you, because the Blue Triton letterheaded paper does indeed look as though Triton is a an external DCA, which it is not.

 

Love AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: HELP PLEASE.......

 

NatWest are in breach of a CCA 1974 Section 77/78 request. They have written to me saying that they cannot provide a properly executed copy of my credit card agreement. However they have passed the debt to Triton Credit Services who have written to me about settlement.

 

Am I right in thinking that whilst they are in breach of a CCA request they cannot pass the debt to DCA? Coincidentally Capital One have just done the same - different DCA though - no copy of card agreement but pursuing the debt.

 

Any advice will be gratefully received, Cheers ROS :confused:

 

 

Hello ros,

 

 

It's also time to report them to OFT, Trading Standards and FOS!

 

NatWest have admitted in writing that they cannot give you a copy of your agreement. So that's them b*******!:-D

 

Have Cap 1 admitted the same?

 

 

Best wishes, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to angrycat, archer 66 and Jeff 2000. Things have moved on.....

Today I received a letter from NatWest stating that they hope I am pleased with their response as they have now supplied

  • a true certified copy of the original agreement
  • Terms and conditions applicable to this account
  • A statement

Well, I did not request or receive a statement neither did I receive a copy of the agreement - only letters stating they could not find the agreement and I did receive Ts & Cs but I'm not sure when they were printed and if they're relevant.

 

So they've committed a criminal act which I've drawn to their attention and now they're trying to cover up the error by lying about what they've supplied. Surely this is fraud?

 

Where do I go to complain now and what should be my next step? Help please. Cheers ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to angrycat, archer 66 and Jeff 2000. Things have moved on.....

Today I received a letter from NatWest stating that they hope I am pleased with their response as they have now supplied

  • a true certified copy of the original agreementTerms
  • and conditions applicable to this accountAAstatementWelllevant

.

 

So they've committed a criminal act which I've drawn to their attention and now they're trying to cover up the error by lying about what they've supplied. Surely this is fraud?

 

Where do I go to complain now and what should be my next step? Help please. Cheers ROS

 

 

Hello ripoffstopper,

 

 

You can start with your local Trading Standards. You can get their e-mail address from your local council. Then send them an e-mail briefly outlining what has happened. They should reply to you giving you a reference number. They will probably want you to send more info, copies of correspondence etc.

 

That should keep you busy for now!

 

 

Good luck, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So things have finally happened.

 

I wrote to Sir Fred Goodwin spelling out everything that had transpired, contacted TSO who were not interested - said they would pass it on to their London office as NatWest HO in London. Still waiting for a response from the OFT & FOS.

 

Now, nearly a month after my letter to the top man at RBS I received the reply below. It just goes to show that The Banks are in turmoil and haven't been following the letter of the law in the way that they have been processing our paperwork.

 

RBS

Gordon F.Pell

Chief Executive

The Royal Bank of Scotland Croup

Retail Markets

1 June 200712th Floor

280 Bishopsgate

 

 

Dear Mr RIPOFFSTOPPER

Thank you for your letter dated 9 May 2007 addressed to Sir Fred Goodwin. Sir Fred is away from the office at present and I am replying on his behalf as Card Services' operations fall within my area of responsibility.

I regret that Card Services has been unable to provide a true copy of the agreement relating to your NatWest Dual Credit Card account. They have tried to meet your requirements and I am sorry that you are unwilling to accept liability for the debt, particularly as you have clearly done so in the past. As we are, at this time, unable to retrieve from our records sufficient information to enable us to satisfy your request under section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA), we are treating the outstanding balance as discharged and the credit agreement as ended. Triton Credit Services have been advised of this decision.

The bank will not be refunding those monies you have already paid in reduction of the account balance. There is no requirement to do so under section 78(1) of the CCA. Our position is that the monies you owed under the agreement were properly due and payable.

The default notice was properly served and your failure to remedy the default within the prescribed period resulted in the bank reporting the position to credit reference agencies. While we are unable to provide a copy of the agreement, the default entry registered with credit reference agencies is considered as correct and the entry will therefore not be removed. However the entry will be updated to confirm that the default balance has been 'satisfied'.

The bank considers that our processing of your data has been fair, lawful and warranted in the circumstances. The registering of the default information was done in accordance with long established procedures and these are acknowledged within the Banking Code. We are satisfied that the default was properly notified to credit reference agencies, and you were sent the appropriate Data Protection Act notifications on the reporting of defaults. If you disagree you have the right to apply to court to have inaccurate personal data rectified, blocked, erased or destroyed. Further information in this is available from the information Commissioner's

website at Information Commissioners Office – Information Commissioner's Office.

Yours sincerely

 

Gordon F Pell. Chief Executive Retail Markets

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group pic Registered in Scotland No 45551 Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh. EH2 2YB

 

So, another victory for common sense and a great thank you to the members of the

" icon1.gif Consumer Credit Act Agreements" forum and the many, many opinions that have been voiced.

Thanks ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow - fantastic stuff! Royal Bank have failed to respond to my CCA request (12 +30 days now expired) so I think I may just be sending a letter to Mr Goodwin too!

 

Hopefully I'll be joining you in having the remaining £2.2K on my RBS credit card discharged.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...