Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Laptop Misrepresentation?


Glyn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I bought this Comet - Computing - Laptops - FUJITSU SIEMENS - 15" wide brightscreen laptop from Comet, on the basis that it has an 80Gb hard drive.

 

Only to find, when I got it home, that I can only access 64Gb of the drive. 12Gb has been partitioned (something to do with being 'reserved for recovery') and made inaccessible to me, without any pre-warning that this was the case. Comet refuse to refund me as "that's how they come" and "it's got an 80Gb drive in it", no answer to the question of why, if the manufacturers and they as the retailers know this is the case, they don't feel the need to inform the customer..?

 

Had I known that I would only be able to access this smaller proportion of the hard drive, I would not have bought the damn thing. I deliberately ignored 60Gb laptops when looking for one to buy because I knew it wouldn't be big ehough for what i want to use the laptop for.

 

I believe (and Consumer Direct think I may have a case, but they were a bit non-committal over the phone) that this contravenes SOGA in that I do not have full use to the goods as described AND I was not given the full facts to base an informed purchase decision as if had known what the situation was beforehand I WOULD NOT have bought the laptop, I would have bought one without an OS and installed one myself.

 

I've put my case in writing to Comet today, asking for a response within seven working days.

 

I'd be grateful for any views anybody out there might have on this and about what chance you think I have..?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have often wondered about this in terms of MP3 players. You know they state 30gb or whatever of memory, yet you don't get all of it.

 

Hmmm. Would be interesting to see something come from a case like this. Maybe they should have "Gross" and "Net" capacities stated on them a la weights and measures law.

 

Don't know if it is one of those things, like "Well how do you think it would work if there were no programs on it to run" or if it is a misleading description. Let us know what Comet say about it. Should be interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To begin with the definition of a GB displayed on the Harddrive and what windows displays it as, is different.

Harddrives are measured as 1GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes

Windows measures data using the method of 1024 bytes = 1KiB, 1024kb = 1MiB 1024MiB= 1GiB (1GiB = 1,073,741,824 bytes)

This causes a difference in in what the manufacture display and what the operating system display. Whilst this is confusing, it has been going on for years. A 80GB HDD therfore in windows = 74.5GiB HDD.

Ok that solves the difference for the OP for mp3 differences etc.

With regards to reserved space on the harddrive. Some of that will be taken up by the operating system, this should be understandable.

If you were going to install an OS yourself, they should be nothing stopping you from formatting the harddrive and reinstalling using the licence key.

Or a way to remove the partion to make it accessible for common use.

  • Haha 1

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. With regards to reserved space on the harddrive. Some of that will be taken up by the operating system, this should be understandable.

 

2. If you were going to install an OS yourself, they should be nothing stopping you from formatting the harddrive and reinstalling using the licence key.

 

3. Or a way to remove the partion to make it accessible for common use.

 

(Sorry about inserting numbers but it makes replying easier)

 

1. The OS is in the 64Gb of hard drive I can access, reducing the actual available space to about 55Gb. I expected the OS to take up that space and I've no problem with that - I certainly didn't expect another 12-13Gb of hard drive to be denied to me on top of that without any warning whatsoever.

 

2. That would involved purchasing another OS disc and key over and above the price I've already paid. Had I known before I bought the laptop that I would have to do this to get the full use of my hard drive, then fair enough I could have budgeted for that. What I object to is finding this out AFTER I got the laptop home, turned it on, and then tried to work out why the HD wasn't showing up as 80Gb in File Manager, but as 64Gb.

 

3. I've had conflicting opinions from Comet staff about this. The Deputy Manager rang Fujitsu, and then told me the hidden partition was a back-up in case someone lost their Recovery Disc, and that the partition could be deleted by instigating the recovery procedure. It can't - I could delete the pre-set partitions (something else that I didn't want and was not informed about before purchase that ****ed me off) but I still could not access the hidden part of the HD during this either.

 

Another of their staff, when I went back after trying the above, said that the OS won't run without the partitioned stuff. So you pays your money and takes your choice as to who believe. Personally, I don't trust any of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the basis that it has an 80Gb hard drive.

 

Does it have an 80Gb hard Drive ? Yes, then it's as described!

 

However, :D if you asked if that was the available hard drive space then you should have been told the full situation.

 

This is just another situation that shows why PC's are not really a 'consumer item' !

Radical comment I know, but it's something I've always believed.

Most (?) of the general public, do not know one end of a pc from another, and on the whole they don't need too. But, the old saying "a little bit of knowledge is dangerous" is so true in these cases.

 

Had you brought it from a proper PC dealer, not a branch of 'we only sell them, do you want a warranty?" brigade, then I'd agree that if you asked the questions and got the wrong answers then the shop is at fault.

But my guess is, you didn't ask the right questions, for one of two reasons, a) you knew the salesman wouldn't know, or b) you didn't know in the first place.

 

Having said that, there are ways to solve the problem, if you really need 65Gb of space. Which to be honest, on a laptop, very few people actually do!

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

2. That would involved purchasing another OS disc and key over and above the price I've already paid. Had I known before I bought the laptop that I would have to do this to get the full use of my hard drive, then fair enough I could have budgeted for that. What I object to is finding this out AFTER I got the laptop home, turned it on, and then tried to work out why the HD wasn't showing up as 80Gb in File Manager, but as 64Gb.

 

 

you can get your license number off the computer with utilities such as magicjellybean and then use any os disk as long as it is the same version and type ie xp pro and oem etc. You seem to be looing for problems rather than soloutions here tbh, this is something easily sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant always use any disc with OEM preinstall like in this case some companies like Dell have their own type of product keys although this is relatively rare.

 

I can assure the OP that you can DEFINITELY delete that hidden partition using the windows disc and then reinstall Windows XP onto the new 80GB partition although it wont be 80GB it'll be something like 76GB for the reasons already listed ie manufacturers use 1MB = 1000Kb whereas in reality 1024K = 1Mb, 1GB = 1024MB etc so lose all thouse 24's and thats where a lot of it goes hence the other way of using metric MiB and GiB which kinda helps get round this side of things

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't possible on the newer version of Windows to reformat a partition from Admin Tools -> Computer Management?

 

It will still be a separate partition but it can be reformatted for storage?

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got to say I would regard the recovery partition as a sensible precaution; I keep mine, and when I got a computer without one I made one.

 

I'd also agree that there isn't any dispute about that what you have is exactly what you were sold; a laptop with an 80GB drive inside it.

 

Will the tech support bods for the manufacturer not help you get rid of the partition if you don't want it?

 

(PS, I think you got yourself a nice machine there for a good price. Must keep saving....)

Number of times I've asked 1st Credit for information that I stil haven't recieved... 55 as at 02/05/07 :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can get your license number off the computer with utilities such as magicjellybean and then use any os disk as long as it is the same version and type ie xp pro and oem etc. You seem to be looing for problems rather than soloutions here tbh, this is something easily sorted.

 

I haven't been provided with an OS disc - certainly not a Microsoft disc - unless the one called 'Recovery Disc' can reinstall from scratch - it didn't ask for a licence number when I used it to try and delete the partition before.

 

And this is NOT about what I need to do after purchase (I shouldn't need to have to look for solutions IMO), but about what I should have been told before purchase to enable to me to make an informed decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the methods some manufacturers use to reduce costs (everyone wants it cheap!) is to make use of thier option to use a 'back-up' partition on the hard drive coupled with a recovery cd. This saves having to provide a separate windows CD, a selection of drivers cd's and a great pile of instructions and/or support for end (ab)users who screw up thier machines. By putting an image file on the hard drive the CD recovery disk can restore the machine to 'as new' configuration in one go.

 

Experienced PC people know this, most inexperienced people (including many shed sales assistants) don't !

 

Unfortunatly, many people do not appreciate the simple fact, that you gety what you pay for!

 

p.s. before anyone comments on the lack of microsoft disk, Manufacturers do not have to provide one, there are provisions in the Microsoft OEM licenseing schemes to avoid it. Although, I do not think that its right, not too !!

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glyn, just a quick question.

 

Did you ask about the partition system on the machine, before you brought it?

 

You have said you wouldn't have brought it had you known about the partitioning, etc. And yet you appear to have forgotten to check!

 

So, I'm trying to decide if you are what I would class as an 'average ' user, most of whom would not know or care about partitions, etc, indeed there is no reason why 'average' users should.

or,

If your a 'advanced' user, who would not have foegotten to ask about partitions, recovery, shared memory ( did you notice the shared memory on that machine? you don't have 1 Gb to use) sand such stuff, even if they don't know or understand the full reasoning behind the options and choices.

 

I'm pretty sure your not a 'techie' user, 'cause you brought from Comet !:D

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fairly well up on home PCs as I've set them up from scratch (built, installed OS, etc.) but I have to admit I don't have much experience of laptop set-ups. That's why I was expecting the OS to take up x amount of space on the HD and have no problem with that. It's the extra 12Gb over and above that denied me without any warning of this being the case that annoys me. If I've bought an 80Gb HD, fine, GIVE me 80Gb (less the space Windows takes up), not 12Gb less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a side note, I had one of these, it died 3 times before they finally gave me a replacement Toshiba. Dixons manager told me he was amazed they had started to stock Fujitsu Siemens again because they are so amazingly unreliable.

 

If there is any way you can return this laptop I would definately advise you to do so!

Jane

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I can assure the OP that you can DEFINITELY delete that hidden partition using the windows disc and then reinstall Windows XP onto the new 80GB partition although it wont be 80GB it'll be something like 76GB

 

I wouldnt count on it, mate of find discovered the same thing when he bought a laptop from pc world, so I repartitioned it to one big partition and it refused to boot. A call to the tech line (cant remember now if it was pc worlds or the manufactures) and I was advised that it wont work with out there partition, seems they put somet special on it, had to send it back to them to reset there hidden partition :mad: luckily my laptop never had one or I would not have been impressed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i've NEVER seen that happen in 12 years odd of fixing this kinda stuff, yes you can get BIOS locked software that will only install on certain machines for example Dell with a free bundled copy of PowerDVD5 which wont install anywhere else.

 

I think you will find that the disc your friend used wasnt a Windows XP disc it was a recovery disc, these are commonly used with restore partitions and they simply access the data from the hidden partition they dont have Windows XP on the CD at all, had he used a full copy of XP then I will wager it would have worked fine in this case if you wipe the partition then you cant restore Windows which is what appears to have been the problem, the simple solution to that is to borrow a CD from a friend and use the licence key already stuck to the laptop and before anyone says anything this is perfectly legal as long as the laptop has a COA sticker on it with the Key

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i've NEVER seen that happen in 12 years odd of fixing this kinda stuff

Same here ! :) Except it may need a change in the BIOS it's rare but sometimes needs it)

 

before anyone says anything this is perfectly legal as long as the laptop has a COA sticker on it with the Key

 

As long as it's the same product and version, i.e. XP home OEM, etc

And if the key don't work, it's prob the wrong version!:p

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is not misrepresented. It is fitted with a 80 gig drive, like it says it is. Otherwise, where do you draw the line? Taking off the space it needs to install the OS? What about the RAM used by the onboard graphics?

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it's an 80Gb drive. Create your recovery disks and re-format and re-install to get the full 80Gb if you wish but it's certainly not mis-represented. Even then, you will probably only get about 72Gb due to the way that HD quantity is represented but I'm sure this has been detailed further up.

 

Not wishing to sound like I'm flaming but if you did know about PC's you would understand this also. It's not exclusive to laptops. First thing I did with my laptop was make the recovery disks then reformat it into a single drive and remove the recovery stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it wouldnt, the product was advertised with an 80GB hard drive and that is what is fitted should the shop advertise it as 80GB hard drive but xxGB reserved for system restore and its not actually 80GB because manufacturers claim 1MB = 1000KB but its actually 1024KB.

 

where do you draw the line?

 

As far as I can see if you went to TS with it and it was sold as 80GB and theres an 80GB fitted then thats it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it's an 80Gb drive. Create your recovery disks and re-format and re-install to get the full 80Gb if you wish but it's certainly not mis-represented. Even then, you will probably only get about 72Gb due to the way that HD quantity is represented but I'm sure this has been detailed further up.

 

Not wishing to sound like I'm flaming but if you did know about PC's you would understand this also. It's not exclusive to laptops. First thing I did with my laptop was make the recovery disks then reformat it into a single drive and remove the recovery stuff.

 

Re-install Windows how? A Windows disc didn't come with it - only a recovery disk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-install Windows how? A Windows disc didn't come with it - only a recovery disk.

The recovery disk contains Windows plus all the drivers needed for your laptop (in theory anyway). Your actual Windows reg key is probably stickered underneath the laptop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...