Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Schoolboy Error


Metalhead1975
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6119 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've done something really, really stupid. I don't think I'll be getting my charges back, and it's my own stupid fault.

 

I sent all my original documentation, including statements to Abbey, without remembering to take copies for myself. Now the court has ordered me to produce a list of the charges I'm claiming, and I simply can't.

 

I've written twice to Abbey asking them to return copies of all the documentation they hold, but so far they have not done so, and the court wants the info before 15th May. To make matters worse, I'm out of the country from 10th - 18th May :(

 

I copied the court in to my last letter to Abbey, but all I got back was a confirmation that I need the info by the 15th or my claim will be thrown out. So it looks like, through my own stupidity, I won't be getting my charges back.

 

Let this be a lesson to everyone - KEEP COPIES OF EVERYTHING. I know it's obvious, and I know it was a schoolboy error, but please, please take the lesson away with you and let my screw up count for something, even if it is only a warning to others not to be as dumb as me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

let the courts know of your error and ask for advice. as for Abbey, well now you've informed them the courts will throw it out if you don't send proof of your claim, then I think i would'nt return them either. Just an error likr you said, but like I said try to explain the problem to the courts and see if they will delay the date for a few weeks until you get sorted.

Regards

Chris

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

as for Abbey, well now you've informed them the courts will throw it out if you don't send proof of your claim, then I think i would'nt return them either.

 

Thing is, I haven't told Abbey that. But they're not silly, I guess they've worked it out by now.

 

Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure I get a letter off to the courts first thing Tuesday :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
ps Have a nice holiday

 

I did... and by way of a quick update, it was just as nice to come home and find a letter from the court ordering Abbey to return my statements by 1st June, or provide replacements free of charge, then allowing me a further 14 days from that day to submit my list of charges to the court.

 

Happy days! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

find a letter from the court ordering Abbey to return my statements by 1st June, or provide replacements free of charge, then allowing me a further 14 days from that day to submit my list of charges to the court.

 

Happy days! :-D

 

Happy Days indeed!

Is it a court order for return of statements or just a letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Days indeed!

Is it a court order for return of statements or just a letter?

 

Well, here's what the letter says in chapter and verse...

 

UPON READING a letter, dated 8th May 2007, from the Claimant (copy attached for the Defendant only):

 

THE COURT DIRECTS of its own initiative that:

 

(1) By 4:00pm on 1st June 2007, the Defendant, by way of disclosure, return to the Claimant the bank statements which he provided or, if they are no longer in the Defendant's custody or control, provide him with duplicates free of charge;

 

(2) The time available to the Claimant in which to comply with the order of 20th April 2007 to be extended until 14 days after the Defendant's compliance with paragraph one of this order

 

(3) This Court Order has been made of the courts own initiative. If you object to it you must make an application to have it varied, stayed or set aside within 14 days of receiving it.

 

Dated 10 May 2007

 

So yeah, its a court order.

 

But now I'm wondering what happens if Abbey don't comply with the court order? I guess I get back to the court and tell them so, but what's the likely outcome of that? Abbey have to pay up? They get told off by the court for not complying and get another few days to give my documents back?

 

Anyone? Bueller? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So yeah, its a court order.

 

But now I'm wondering what happens if Abbey don't comply with the court order? I guess I get back to the court and tell them so, but what's the likely outcome of that? Abbey have to pay up? They get told off by the court for not complying and get another few days to give my documents back?

 

Good question! I was wondering if you could win by default? I can't answer this question but maybe someone else can!

 

If you don't get an answer maybe you should pm someone like Michael Browne or Gary-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Big Lash
But now I'm wondering what happens if Abbey don't comply with the court order? I guess I get back to the court and tell them so, but what's the likely outcome of that? Abbey have to pay up? They get told off by the court for not complying and get another few days to give my documents back?

 

I don't believe this will mean you get a refund of your charges by default, as it is a different matter and does not make part of the courts directions.

 

If they fail to respond, then you go back to the court and seek their judgement, and then take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe this will mean you get a refund of your charges by default, as it is a different matter and does not make part of the courts directions.

 

If they fail to respond, then you go back to the court and seek their judgement, and then take it from there.

 

I had a feeling that might be the case - guess I'll just have to suck it and see :)

 

Thanks for your help and input, everyone :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update - foxtrot alpha from shAbbey so far. Looks like we might be finding out what the Court orders in cases like these after all!

 

In fact, this also seems like the perfect opportunity to bring the Abuse Order thing in to play... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might it be the case that Abbey haven't actually gotten all of your correspondence documents together (ie charges lists etc), as they have no intention of going to court and defending the case?

Quite often in these cases, the banks do not sent case summaries or bundles in and do not even turn up at court.

Makes you wonder what they actually do with our correspondence eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Potentially, I suppose it could be. We all know that banks (and Abbey in particular) have no intention of defending things in court, and are notorious for dragging their heels over this sort of thing, hoping people will just give up and go away. Which really amounts to them extracting the urine out of the courts system. Like I said before, I think it's the ideal time to play the Abuse Order card :)

 

As for what they do with our correspondence, my guess is that there is a huge pile of paper aeroplanes all around the outside of Abbey's head office building ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question, do you have a current account contract, or terms and conditions?, as my mum was never sent one, they just upgraded her from a savings type account.

 

Sadly, I don't - I've had my account with them for years, and I don't have a clue where any of my original documentation is!

 

Another quick update while I'm at it - nothing from Abbey in today's post. I know they have until 4pm today to return my documents to me, but forgive me if I don't hold my breath.

 

My letter to the court telling them that Abbey haven't responded, and requesting a defence strikeout on the strength of that - as well as all the other useful info, examples and documentation in the strikeout thread - will be in the post at 4:00.01 today! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, looks like Abbey have one last chance to do the necessary...

 

Got the following from the court this morning: -

 

UPON READING a letter, dated 2nd June 2007, from the Claimant (copy attached for the Defendant);

 

AND FURTHER to directions given on 20th April 2007 and 10th May 2007:

 

THE COURT DIRECTS of its own initiative that:

 

(1) UNLESS the Defendant complies by 4:00pm on 29th June 2007 with paragraphone of the order of 10th May 2007 (copy attached), its defence stand struck out and the Claimant be entitled to enter Judgement against the Defendant for the claim and costs;

 

(2) This Court Order has been made of the courts own initiative. If you object to it you must make an application to have it varied, stayed or set aside within 14 days of receiving it.

 

Dated 06 June 2007

 

So, can't really complain about that. I'd almost bet my left one that Abbey doing nothing once more and I get a strikeout win! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another update...

 

Abbey got their fingers out and have sent me a new copy of my statements etc.

 

So, I've sent the list of charges the Court wanted today, and I guess we'll see where it goes from here - my guess would be a court date, which will then be followed by Abbey settling right before the date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...